THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

Volume: 16 Number: 2 December 3, 2016
  • Betül Öğütmen
  • Mehmet Koç
  • Serhan Tuğlular
  • Emel Akoğlu
  • Çetin Özener
EN

THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin versus pravastatin, in dyslipidémie patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
Material and methods: Fifty-five hyperlipidémie CAPD patients were randomized to either atorvastatin (n=27) or pravastatin (n=28) treatment and prospectively followed for nine months. Hyperlipidemia was defined as TC >200mg/dl (5.2 mmol/L) and LDL-C >135 mg/dl (3.5 mmol/L). Both drugs were initiated at a dose of 10 mg/day and the doses were increased if LDL-C was >135 mg/dl at visits done every three months. The blood glucose, serum albumin total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), triglyceride (TG), AST, ALT, GGT, uric acid, CPK, HbA1C were measured in the fasting blood samples taken at baseline, and at 3rd, 6th and 9th months of the treatment.
Results: Both agents resulted in a marked reduction in the TC, LDL-C and TG levels; but no change was observed for VLDL-C and HDL- C in either of the treatment arms. The proportional decrease of TC and LDL-C was more marked in the atorvastatin group,
compared to pravastatin group. No major side effects were observed with either of the statins in these patient groups.
Conclusion: The results of our study
demonstrated that although both statins improved the lipid profiles and both are safe for use in dyslipidémie CAPD patients, and higher starting doses (20 mg) may be required for pravastatin in patients on CAPD treatment.
Key Words: Dyslipidemia, Atorvastatin, Pravastatin, Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

References

  1. /. Foley RH, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998:32:112-119.
  2. Keane WF, Brenner BN, Nazzu A, Agro A. The Chorus (Cerivastatin in Heart Outcomes in
  3. Renal Disease: Understading Survival)
  4. protocol: A double blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:48-53.
  5. Bertram L. Kasiske. Hyperlipidemia in patients with chronic renal disease. Am. J. Kidney Dis 1998;32:142-156.
  6. Keane WF, Nulcahy IVS, Kasiske BL, Kim Y, O Donnell NP. Hyperlipidemia and progressive renal disease. Kidney Int 1991;31:41-48.
  7. Rader DJ, Rosas S. Hypertriglycemia, low HDL Cholestrol, lipoprotein (a), in tyroid and renal diseases. Post-Transplantation 2000:84:52- 54.
  8. Attman P, Alaupovic P, Samuelsson O. Lipoprotein abnormalities as a risk factor for progressive nondiabetic renal disease. Kidney Int 1999:56:14-18.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Betül Öğütmen This is me

Mehmet Koç This is me

Serhan Tuğlular This is me

Emel Akoğlu This is me

Çetin Özener This is me

Publication Date

December 3, 2016

Submission Date

February 17, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2003 Volume: 16 Number: 2

APA
Öğütmen, B., Koç, M., Tuğlular, S., Akoğlu, E., & Özener, Ç. (2016). THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS. Marmara Medical Journal, 16(2), 90-96. https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB
AMA
1.Öğütmen B, Koç M, Tuğlular S, Akoğlu E, Özener Ç. THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS. Marmara Med J. 2016;16(2):90-96. https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB
Chicago
Öğütmen, Betül, Mehmet Koç, Serhan Tuğlular, Emel Akoğlu, and Çetin Özener. 2016. “THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS”. Marmara Medical Journal 16 (2): 90-96. https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB.
EndNote
Öğütmen B, Koç M, Tuğlular S, Akoğlu E, Özener Ç (March 15, 2016) THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS. Marmara Medical Journal 16 2 90–96.
IEEE
[1]B. Öğütmen, M. Koç, S. Tuğlular, E. Akoğlu, and Ç. Özener, “THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS”, Marmara Med J, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 90–96, Mar. 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB
ISNAD
Öğütmen, Betül - Koç, Mehmet - Tuğlular, Serhan - Akoğlu, Emel - Özener, Çetin. “THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS”. Marmara Medical Journal 16/2 (March 15, 2016): 90-96. https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB.
JAMA
1.Öğütmen B, Koç M, Tuğlular S, Akoğlu E, Özener Ç. THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS. Marmara Med J. 2016;16:90–96.
MLA
Öğütmen, Betül, et al. “THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 16, no. 2, Mar. 2016, pp. 90-96, https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB.
Vancouver
1.Betül Öğütmen, Mehmet Koç, Serhan Tuğlular, Emel Akoğlu, Çetin Özener. THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ATORVASTATIN VERSUS PRAVASTATIN IN DYSLIPIDEMIC PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS. Marmara Med J [Internet]. 2016 Mar. 15;16(2):90-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA62PW77JB