Research Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair

Volume: 34 Number: 1 January 29, 2021
EN

Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the open and arthroscopic rotator cuff tear treatment methods in terms of cost-effectiveness. Patients and Methods: TThis study includes a prospective method of a total of 104 patients, 52 with open surgery and 52 with arthroscopic surgery, in the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Cost calculations of the treatment methods were obtained from patient invoices. Oxford Shoulder Score and Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire were used for effectiveness calculations. The costeffectiveness comparison was conducted using the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) assessment. The difference between costs of open and arthroscopic surgery was analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 package program. with Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The average cost per patient was 4,838.7 Turkish Liras (TL) (866.22 USD) in open surgery and 5,770.33 TL (1,033.00 USD) according to the exchange rate at the time of writing, in arthroscopic surgery. Oxford Shoulder Score was 21.15 in open surgery and 20.83 in arthroscopic surgery. Short Form-36 Health Survey Questionnaire score was 61.92 in open surgery and 63.17 in arthroscopic surgery. The ICER calculated according to the Oxford Shoulder Score was – 2,912.37 TL (521,37 USD), while the ICER calculated according to the General Health Perception sub-scale of Short Form-36 was 745.57 TL (133,47 USD). In addition, statistical significant difference was found between the surgery, medication, medical and surgical materials, hospitalization and average cost of those treated with open surgery and those treated with arthroscopic surgery (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the efficacy scores of the treatment groups. However, there was statistically significant difference between costs of the treatment groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Karapınar S, Uruç V, Özden R, Duman İ, Doğramacı Y, Kalacı A. Clinical radiological outcomes of rotator cuff repair by single-row suture-anchor technique with mini – open approach. Dicle Med J 2014; 41: 347-51. doi: 10.5798/ diclemedj.0921.2014.02.0429
  2. Mahiroğulları M, İşyar M, Çakmak S. Rotator cuff tears. TOTBID Journal 2013;12: 353 – 59. doi: 10.14292/totbid. dergisi.2013.43
  3. Aminzadeh B, Najafi S, Moradi A, Abbasi B, Farrokh D, Emadzadeh M. Evaluation of diagnostic precision of ultrasound for rotator cuff disorders in patients with shoulder pain. Arch Bone Jt Surg 2020;8:689-95. doi:10.22038/ abjs.2020.42894.2166
  4. Kjima H, Minagawa H, Nishi T, Kikuchi K, Shimada Y. Long-term follow-up of cases of Rotator cuff tear treated conservatively. J Shoulder Elb Surg 2012; 2: 491-94. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.012
  5. Bunker T. Rotator cuff disease. Current Orthopaedics 2002; 16: 223-33. doi: 10.1054/cuor.2002.0257
  6. Yaradılmış Y, Okkaoğlu M, Şeşen H, Tarğal A, Ateş A, Altay M. There is no difference in between clinical results of fast transosseos repair and double row suture anchor technique for repair of rotator cuff rupture. Bozok Med J 2019; 9 : 1-8. doi: 10.16919/bozoktip.427558
  7. Castagna A, Garofalo R, Maman E, Gray A, Brooks E. Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the subacromial spacer for irreparable and massive rotator cuff tears. Int Orthop 2019; 43: 395-403. doi:10.1007/s00264.018.4065-x
  8. First 100 Hospitals in Each Branch 2017 January-October Policlinic, Hospitalization, Intensive Care and Emergency Service Statistics. https://dosyahastane.saglik.gov.tr/ Eklenti/9300,2017-ocak-ekim-donemi-poliklinik-yatis- ve-yogun-bakim-ve-acil-servis-verileri-baglaminda-herbransta- ilk-100-hastanepdf.pdf?0 (Access date: 01.11.2019)

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 29, 2021

Submission Date

September 16, 2020

Acceptance Date

November 23, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 34 Number: 1

APA
Akcal, M. A., Ozturk, N., Isıkcelık, F., & Agırbas, I. (2021). Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Medical Journal, 34(1), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.869051
AMA
1.Akcal MA, Ozturk N, Isıkcelık F, Agırbas I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Med J. 2021;34(1):66-71. doi:10.5472/marumj.869051
Chicago
Akcal, Mehmet Akif, Nazife Ozturk, Ferda Isıkcelık, and Ismail Agırbas. 2021. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Arthroscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery in Rotator Cuff Repair”. Marmara Medical Journal 34 (1): 66-71. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.869051.
EndNote
Akcal MA, Ozturk N, Isıkcelık F, Agırbas I (January 1, 2021) Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Medical Journal 34 1 66–71.
IEEE
[1]M. A. Akcal, N. Ozturk, F. Isıkcelık, and I. Agırbas, “Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair”, Marmara Med J, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 66–71, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.5472/marumj.869051.
ISNAD
Akcal, Mehmet Akif - Ozturk, Nazife - Isıkcelık, Ferda - Agırbas, Ismail. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Arthroscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery in Rotator Cuff Repair”. Marmara Medical Journal 34/1 (January 1, 2021): 66-71. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.869051.
JAMA
1.Akcal MA, Ozturk N, Isıkcelık F, Agırbas I. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Med J. 2021;34:66–71.
MLA
Akcal, Mehmet Akif, et al. “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Arthroscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery in Rotator Cuff Repair”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 66-71, doi:10.5472/marumj.869051.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Akif Akcal, Nazife Ozturk, Ferda Isıkcelık, Ismail Agırbas. Cost-effectiveness analysis of arthroscopic surgery versus open surgery in rotator cuff repair. Marmara Med J. 2021 Jan. 1;34(1):66-71. doi:10.5472/marumj.869051

Cited By