Research Article

Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Volume: 34 Number: 2 May 31, 2021
  • Selin Sahın
  • Ahmet Besir *
  • Ali Akdogan
  • Ersagun Tugcugıl
  • Sedat Saylan
EN

Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery

Abstract

Objective: We compared the air or saline insufflated endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures and their effects on postoperative respiratory complications in gynecological laparoscopic surgeries in the Trendelenburg position (TP). Patients and Methods: This prospective study was carried out on a total of 60 patients, whose ages ranged from 18 to 65 years and who were classified by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as I-III. They were scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery in TP. Patients included in the study were randomly divided into two groups as the saline (Group S, n=30) and air (Group A, n=30) groups. ETT cuff pressures and peak airway pressures were recorded immediately after intubation and at 10-minute intervals during the intraoperative period. Results: The cuff pressure and maximum cuff pressure values in the saline group were significantly lower than in the air group in the 50-minute (p<0.05). The sore throat and analgesic consumption were significantly lower in Group S in postoperative 24 hours (p<0.001, for all). Conclusion: The intraoperative cuff pressures, postoperative sore throat, and analgesic consumption were lower in the salineinsufflated group than in the air-insufflated group in gynecological laparoscopic surgery in TP.

Keywords

References

  1. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, editors. Clinical Anesthesiology 5th ed.International Edition: New York: Lange Medical Books, 2015:309-41.
  2. Atlas GM. A mathematical model of differential tracheal tube cuff pressure: effects of diffusion and temperature. J Clin Monit Comput 2005;19:415-25. doi: 10.1007/s10877.005.1626-5.
  3. Girling KJ, Bedforth NM, Spendlove JL, Mahajan RP. Assessing neuromuscular block at the larynx: the effect of change in resting cuff pressure and a comparison with video imaging in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg 1999;88:426- 31. doi: 10.1097/00000.539.199902000-00038.
  4. Godoy AC, Vieira RJ, Capitani EM. Endotracheal tube cuff pressure alteration after changes in position in patients under mechanical ventilation. J Bras Pneumol 2008;34:294-97. doi: 10.1590/s1806.371.3200800.050.0008.
  5. Hameed AA, Mohamed H, Al-Mansoori M. Acquired tracheoesophageal fistula due to high intracuff pressure. Ann Thorac Med 2008;3:23-5. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.37950.
  6. Harris R, Joseph A. Acute tracheal rupture related to endotracheal intubation: case report. J Emerg Med 2000;18:35- 9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(99)00159-6.
  7. Pookamala S, Thakar A, Puri K, Singh P, Kumar R, Sharma SC. Acquired subglottic stenosis: aetiological profile and treatment results. J Laryngol Otol 2014;128:641-8. doi: 10.1017/S002.221.5114000966.
  8. Touat L, Fournier C, Ramon P, Salleron J, Durocher A, Nseir S. Intubation-related tracheal ischemic lesions: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:575-82. doi: 10.1007/s00134.012.2750-6.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Ahmet Besir * This is me
0000-0001-6059-4347
Türkiye

Ersagun Tugcugıl This is me
0000-0002-1963-2206
Türkiye

Publication Date

May 31, 2021

Submission Date

November 25, 2020

Acceptance Date

February 13, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 34 Number: 2

APA
Sahın, S., Besir, A., Akdogan, A., Tugcugıl, E., & Saylan, S. (2021). Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Marmara Medical Journal, 34(2), 140-146. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.942649
AMA
1.Sahın S, Besir A, Akdogan A, Tugcugıl E, Saylan S. Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Marmara Med J. 2021;34(2):140-146. doi:10.5472/marumj.942649
Chicago
Sahın, Selin, Ahmet Besir, Ali Akdogan, Ersagun Tugcugıl, and Sedat Saylan. 2021. “Comparison of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures Inflated With Saline or Air in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal 34 (2): 140-46. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.942649.
EndNote
Sahın S, Besir A, Akdogan A, Tugcugıl E, Saylan S (May 1, 2021) Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Marmara Medical Journal 34 2 140–146.
IEEE
[1]S. Sahın, A. Besir, A. Akdogan, E. Tugcugıl, and S. Saylan, “Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery”, Marmara Med J, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 140–146, May 2021, doi: 10.5472/marumj.942649.
ISNAD
Sahın, Selin - Besir, Ahmet - Akdogan, Ali - Tugcugıl, Ersagun - Saylan, Sedat. “Comparison of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures Inflated With Saline or Air in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal 34/2 (May 1, 2021): 140-146. https://doi.org/10.5472/marumj.942649.
JAMA
1.Sahın S, Besir A, Akdogan A, Tugcugıl E, Saylan S. Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Marmara Med J. 2021;34:140–146.
MLA
Sahın, Selin, et al. “Comparison of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures Inflated With Saline or Air in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, May 2021, pp. 140-6, doi:10.5472/marumj.942649.
Vancouver
1.Selin Sahın, Ahmet Besir, Ali Akdogan, Ersagun Tugcugıl, Sedat Saylan. Comparison of endotracheal tube cuff pressures inflated with saline or air in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Marmara Med J. 2021 May 1;34(2):140-6. doi:10.5472/marumj.942649

Cited By