Öz
Objective: The aim of this descriptive study is to evaluate the knowledge of diabetic and nondiabetic patients of "diabetes mellitus".
Methods: Eighty-one diabetic and 89 nondiabetic patients who attended different clinics at Marmara University Hospital were included in the study. A questionnaire was used for the evaluation.
Results: The mean knowledge score was 78.0 in diabetic patients and 63.0 in the other group; the difference between the scores was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between knowledge and age, sex, marital status, occupation in both groups. However a statistically significant association was found between knowledge and the educational level in the non-diabetic group. 16% of the diabetic patients reported that they had attended a structured educational session or course about diabetes mellitus (DM) in the past. The two main sources of knowledge of the diabetic patients were their physicians and the media, while friends were the main source for the group. There was no association between the knowledge score and duration of the disease in the diabetic group.
Conclusion: The results of this study may indicate that health care provider-patient interaction is one of the most important opportunities for patients to obtain knowledge concerning their illness.
Key Words: Patient education, patient
empowerment, autonomy, diabetes mellitus.
Kaynakça
- Rakel E. Essentials of family medicine. In: McFarland RE, Updike JC, eds, Diabetes Mellitus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Inc. 1993: 365-369.
- Rubin RU, l/oss C, Derksen DJ, Qateley A,
- Quenzer RW. Medicine: a primary care approach. In: Carter JS. ed. Common
- endocrine problems: Diabetes Mellitus.
- Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1996: 287-290.
- Taylor RB. Manual of family practice. In: Smith
- CR, Sheehan JP, Ulchaker MM, eds. Diabetes Mellitus. Flew York: Little, Brown and
- Company, 1997:604-615.
- Anderson WM, Eunnell MM. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Care 1995; 18:943- 949.
- Miller LV, Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county hospital setting. H Engl J Med 1972; 286: 1388-1390.
- Turkish Demographic and health Survey 1998. hacettepe University of Population Studies Ankara-Turkey, MEASURE DhS+ Macro International Inc. Catverton, Maryland USA. October 1999, 17-19.
- Fitzgerald JT, Eunnell MM, Mess GE, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care 1998; 21,706- 710.
- Beeney LJ, Bakry AA, Dunn SM. Rnowledge improvement and metabolic control of diabetes: approaching the limits? Patient Education Couns 1990; 16:21 7-229.
- Clark CM Jr. Reducing the burden of diabetes. The national Diabetes Education Program. Diabetes Care 1998 21 Suppl 3: C30-31.
Öz
Objective: The aim of this descriptive study is to evaluate the knowledge of diabetic and nondiabetic patients of "diabetes mellitus".
Methods: Eighty-one diabetic and 89 nondiabetic patients who attended different clinics at Marmara University Hospital were included in the study. A questionnaire was used for the evaluation.
Results: The mean knowledge score was 78.0 in diabetic patients and 63.0 in the other group; the difference between the scores was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference between knowledge and age, sex, marital status, occupation in both groups. However a statistically significant association was found between knowledge and the educational level in the non-diabetic group. 16% of the diabetic patients reported that they had attended a structured educational session or course about diabetes mellitus (DM) in the past. The two main sources of knowledge of the diabetic patients were their physicians and the media, while friends were the main source for the group. There was no association between the knowledge score and duration of the disease in the diabetic group.
Conclusion: The results of this study may indicate that health care provider-patient interaction is one of the most important opportunities for patients to obtain knowledge concerning their illness.
Key Words: Patient education, patient
empowerment, autonomy, diabetes mellitus.
Kaynakça
- Rakel E. Essentials of family medicine. In: McFarland RE, Updike JC, eds, Diabetes Mellitus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Inc. 1993: 365-369.
- Rubin RU, l/oss C, Derksen DJ, Qateley A,
- Quenzer RW. Medicine: a primary care approach. In: Carter JS. ed. Common
- endocrine problems: Diabetes Mellitus.
- Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company, 1996: 287-290.
- Taylor RB. Manual of family practice. In: Smith
- CR, Sheehan JP, Ulchaker MM, eds. Diabetes Mellitus. Flew York: Little, Brown and
- Company, 1997:604-615.
- Anderson WM, Eunnell MM. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomised controlled trial. Diabetes Care 1995; 18:943- 949.
- Miller LV, Goldstein J. More efficient care of diabetic patients in a county hospital setting. H Engl J Med 1972; 286: 1388-1390.
- Turkish Demographic and health Survey 1998. hacettepe University of Population Studies Ankara-Turkey, MEASURE DhS+ Macro International Inc. Catverton, Maryland USA. October 1999, 17-19.
- Fitzgerald JT, Eunnell MM, Mess GE, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabetes Care 1998; 21,706- 710.
- Beeney LJ, Bakry AA, Dunn SM. Rnowledge improvement and metabolic control of diabetes: approaching the limits? Patient Education Couns 1990; 16:21 7-229.
- Clark CM Jr. Reducing the burden of diabetes. The national Diabetes Education Program. Diabetes Care 1998 21 Suppl 3: C30-31.
Ayrıntılar
| Bölüm | Original Research |
|---|---|
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 3 Aralık 2016 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2000 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 |