BibTex RIS Cite

NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES

Year 2002, Volume: 15 Issue: 4, 267 - 272, 03.12.2016

Abstract

Three dimensional electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) angiography is a useful technique for the depiction of renal artery lesions and for vascular variants. Generic advantages of ultrafast tomography and thin slice imaging, are registered volume data set with overlapping reconstructions to reduce partial volume effect and effective contrast medium utilization. Ultrafast EBCT with its axial images and several three dimensional techniques, is easy to apply, functional and accurate for renal vascular anatomy and renal artery stenosis (RAS) and useful for detection of extension of the trauma and intravascular tumor in partial nephrectomy.
Key Words: EBCT, Three dimension, Angiography, UPJ (ureteropelvic junction) stenoses, Trauma.

References

  • Gould RG. Principles of ultra fast computed
  • tomography: Historical aspects, mechanism of action, and scanner characteristics. In: Stanford W, Rumberger J, eds. UFCT in Cardiac Imaging. Principles and Practice. Hew York: Futura Publishing Company Inc.,
  • :4-12.
  • linuma TA, Tateno Y, Umegaki Y, et al. Proposed system for ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977:1,-494-499.
  • Boyd DP. Future technologies, transmission CT. In: Hewton TH, Potts DG, eds. Radiology of the Skull and Brain. Volume 5. Technical Aspects of CT. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co., 1981.
  • Barnes GT, Lakshminarayanan AV. Conventional and spiral CT. Physical principles and image quality considerations. In: Lee JR T, SageI SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, eds. Computed Body Tomography with MR! Correlation. Volume I. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott-Raven , 1998:6-7.
  • Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during CT: Effective doses at multidetector row CT and electron beam CT. Radiology 2003; 226:145-152.
  • Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Ruszyk BS, et al.
  • Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography-
  • comparison of real-time volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorhythms. Radiology 1999;21 / :337-343.
  • Ruszyk BS, Heath DG, Hey DR, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: imaging findings. AJR 1995; 165:445-448.
  • Smith PA, Fishman ER. CT angiography: renal applications. In: Ferris EJ, Waltman AC, Fishman ER, Polak JF, Potchen EJ, eds. Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology-Vascular Imaging. Oak Brook, III:
  • Radioloqical Society of Horth America, 1998; 35-45.
  • Ruszyk BS, Fishman ER. Technical aspects of CT angiography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:383-393.
  • Smith PA, Fishman ER. Three dimensional CT angiography: renal applications. Semin
  • Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:413-424.
  • I I. Rattee R, Beek F,de Lange E, et al. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography and optimized digital substraction angiography. Radiology 1997,205: 121-127.
  • Platt J, Ellis J, Rorobkin M, et al. Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: findings in 154 subjects. AJR 1997; 169:1325-1330.
  • Rubin GD. Spiral (helical) CT of the renal vasculature. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996; I 7:374-1397.
  • Smith PA, Rainer LE, Lynch FC, et al. Role of CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Radiographies 1998; 18:589-601.
  • Herts BR, Coll DM, Lieber ML, et al. Triphasic helical CT of the kidneys: contribution of vascular phase scanning in patients before urologie surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;
  • I 73:1273-1277.
  • Hoffman LV, Smith PA, Ruszyk BS, et al. Three dimensional helical CT angiography in renal transplant recipients: a new problem solving tool. AJR 1999; 173:1085-1089.
  • Lehmann RJ, W&isser G, Heff RW, et al. First results of computerised tomographic angiography using electron beam tomography. Europ Radiol 1999:9:625-629.
  • Johnson PT, Heath DG, Ruszyk BS, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. Radiology 1996; 200:564- 568.
  • Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DB, et al. Three- dimensional CT:real time interactive volume rendering. AJR 1996; 167:581 -583.
  • Coll DM, Herts BR, Davros WJ, et al. Preoperative use of 3D volume rendering to demonstrate renal tumors and renal anatomy. Radiographies 2000:20:43 I -438.
  • Rawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, et al. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radigraphics 2000:20:1321 -1340.
  • Urban BA, Ratner LE, Fishman ER. Three- dimensional volume rendered CT angiography
  • Sava§ M. Tepe, el al
  • oí the renal arteries and veins:riormal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographies 2001;21:373-386.
  • ílalpern EJ, Mitchell DO, Wechler RJ, et al. Preoperative evaluation of CT angiography and MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 216:434-439.
  • Frager DM. Invited commentary. Radiographies 2000;20:1353-1354.
  • Radir S. Angiography of the kidneys. ImRadir S, ed. Diagnostic angiography. Philadelphia: Pa-.Saunders, 1986:445-495.
  • Spring DB, Salvatierra O Jr, Palubinskas AJ, et at. Results and significance of angiography in potential kidney donors. Radiology 1979; 133:45-47.
  • Rubin QD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995; 195:457-462.
  • Pickering TO. Renovascular hypertension: etiology and pathophysiology. Semin Muc! Med 1989; 19:79-88.
  • Bookstein JJ, Maxwell MM, Abram ns ML, et al. Cooperative study of radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. JAMA 1977; 237:1706-1709.
  • Soullez G, Oliva VL, Turpin S, et al. Imaging of renovascular hypertension: Respective values of renal scintigraphy, renal doppler US, and MR angiography. Radiographies 2000;20: 1355-1368.
  • Mann SJ, Pickering TO. Detection of renovascular hypertension: state of the art- 1992. Ann Inter Med 1992; 117:845-853.
  • Youngberg JP, Sheps SG, Strong CG. Fibromuscular disease or the renal arteries. Med Clin Morth Am 1977; 61:623-641.
  • Marrison EG Jr, Munt JC, Bernatz PE. Morphology of fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal artery in renovascular hypertension. Am J Med 1967;43:97-1 12.
  • Qanadli SD, Mesurolle B, Coggia M, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pretheraphy assessment with dual -slice helical CT angiography. AJR 2000; 1 74:181 -187.
  • Campbell SC, Fichtner J, Movick AC, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of the role of ultrasonography and hystopathological frozen sections. J Urol 1996; 155:1 191-1195.
  • Bazeed MA, Scharfe T, Becht E, et al. Conservative surgery of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1986; 12:238-243.
  • Thomsen HS, Sos TA, Mielsen S. Renovascular hypertension: diagnosis and intervention. Acta Radiol 1990; 30:1 13-120.
  • Bluemke DA, Chambers TP. Spiral CT angiography: an alternative to conventional angiography. Radiology 1995; 195: 317-319.
  • Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, et al. Renal
  • artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography.
  • Radiology 1993,189: 185-192.
Year 2002, Volume: 15 Issue: 4, 267 - 272, 03.12.2016

Abstract

References

  • Gould RG. Principles of ultra fast computed
  • tomography: Historical aspects, mechanism of action, and scanner characteristics. In: Stanford W, Rumberger J, eds. UFCT in Cardiac Imaging. Principles and Practice. Hew York: Futura Publishing Company Inc.,
  • :4-12.
  • linuma TA, Tateno Y, Umegaki Y, et al. Proposed system for ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1977:1,-494-499.
  • Boyd DP. Future technologies, transmission CT. In: Hewton TH, Potts DG, eds. Radiology of the Skull and Brain. Volume 5. Technical Aspects of CT. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co., 1981.
  • Barnes GT, Lakshminarayanan AV. Conventional and spiral CT. Physical principles and image quality considerations. In: Lee JR T, SageI SS, Stanley RJ, Heiken JP, eds. Computed Body Tomography with MR! Correlation. Volume I. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott-Raven , 1998:6-7.
  • Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A, et al. Radiation exposure during CT: Effective doses at multidetector row CT and electron beam CT. Radiology 2003; 226:145-152.
  • Johnson PT, Halpern EJ, Ruszyk BS, et al.
  • Renal artery stenosis: CT angiography-
  • comparison of real-time volume rendering and maximum intensity projection algorhythms. Radiology 1999;21 / :337-343.
  • Ruszyk BS, Heath DG, Hey DR, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: imaging findings. AJR 1995; 165:445-448.
  • Smith PA, Fishman ER. CT angiography: renal applications. In: Ferris EJ, Waltman AC, Fishman ER, Polak JF, Potchen EJ, eds. Syllabus: A Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology-Vascular Imaging. Oak Brook, III:
  • Radioloqical Society of Horth America, 1998; 35-45.
  • Ruszyk BS, Fishman ER. Technical aspects of CT angiography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:383-393.
  • Smith PA, Fishman ER. Three dimensional CT angiography: renal applications. Semin
  • Ultrasound CT MR 1998; 19:413-424.
  • I I. Rattee R, Beek F,de Lange E, et al. Renal artery stenosis: detection and quantification with spiral CT angiography and optimized digital substraction angiography. Radiology 1997,205: 121-127.
  • Platt J, Ellis J, Rorobkin M, et al. Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: findings in 154 subjects. AJR 1997; 169:1325-1330.
  • Rubin GD. Spiral (helical) CT of the renal vasculature. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1996; I 7:374-1397.
  • Smith PA, Rainer LE, Lynch FC, et al. Role of CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Radiographies 1998; 18:589-601.
  • Herts BR, Coll DM, Lieber ML, et al. Triphasic helical CT of the kidneys: contribution of vascular phase scanning in patients before urologie surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;
  • I 73:1273-1277.
  • Hoffman LV, Smith PA, Ruszyk BS, et al. Three dimensional helical CT angiography in renal transplant recipients: a new problem solving tool. AJR 1999; 173:1085-1089.
  • Lehmann RJ, W&isser G, Heff RW, et al. First results of computerised tomographic angiography using electron beam tomography. Europ Radiol 1999:9:625-629.
  • Johnson PT, Heath DG, Ruszyk BS, et al. CT angiography with volume rendering: advantages and applications in splanchnic vascular imaging. Radiology 1996; 200:564- 568.
  • Johnson PT, Heath DG, Bliss DB, et al. Three- dimensional CT:real time interactive volume rendering. AJR 1996; 167:581 -583.
  • Coll DM, Herts BR, Davros WJ, et al. Preoperative use of 3D volume rendering to demonstrate renal tumors and renal anatomy. Radiographies 2000:20:43 I -438.
  • Rawashima A, Sandler CM, Ernst RD, et al. CT evaluation of renovascular disease. Radigraphics 2000:20:1321 -1340.
  • Urban BA, Ratner LE, Fishman ER. Three- dimensional volume rendered CT angiography
  • Sava§ M. Tepe, el al
  • oí the renal arteries and veins:riormal anatomy, variants, and clinical applications. Radiographies 2001;21:373-386.
  • ílalpern EJ, Mitchell DO, Wechler RJ, et al. Preoperative evaluation of CT angiography and MR angiography. Radiology 2000; 216:434-439.
  • Frager DM. Invited commentary. Radiographies 2000;20:1353-1354.
  • Radir S. Angiography of the kidneys. ImRadir S, ed. Diagnostic angiography. Philadelphia: Pa-.Saunders, 1986:445-495.
  • Spring DB, Salvatierra O Jr, Palubinskas AJ, et at. Results and significance of angiography in potential kidney donors. Radiology 1979; 133:45-47.
  • Rubin QD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995; 195:457-462.
  • Pickering TO. Renovascular hypertension: etiology and pathophysiology. Semin Muc! Med 1989; 19:79-88.
  • Bookstein JJ, Maxwell MM, Abram ns ML, et al. Cooperative study of radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. JAMA 1977; 237:1706-1709.
  • Soullez G, Oliva VL, Turpin S, et al. Imaging of renovascular hypertension: Respective values of renal scintigraphy, renal doppler US, and MR angiography. Radiographies 2000;20: 1355-1368.
  • Mann SJ, Pickering TO. Detection of renovascular hypertension: state of the art- 1992. Ann Inter Med 1992; 117:845-853.
  • Youngberg JP, Sheps SG, Strong CG. Fibromuscular disease or the renal arteries. Med Clin Morth Am 1977; 61:623-641.
  • Marrison EG Jr, Munt JC, Bernatz PE. Morphology of fibromuscular dysplasia of the renal artery in renovascular hypertension. Am J Med 1967;43:97-1 12.
  • Qanadli SD, Mesurolle B, Coggia M, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm: pretheraphy assessment with dual -slice helical CT angiography. AJR 2000; 1 74:181 -187.
  • Campbell SC, Fichtner J, Movick AC, et al. Intraoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: a prospective study of the role of ultrasonography and hystopathological frozen sections. J Urol 1996; 155:1 191-1195.
  • Bazeed MA, Scharfe T, Becht E, et al. Conservative surgery of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 1986; 12:238-243.
  • Thomsen HS, Sos TA, Mielsen S. Renovascular hypertension: diagnosis and intervention. Acta Radiol 1990; 30:1 13-120.
  • Bluemke DA, Chambers TP. Spiral CT angiography: an alternative to conventional angiography. Radiology 1995; 195: 317-319.
  • Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, et al. Renal
  • artery stenoses: spiral CT angiography.
  • Radiology 1993,189: 185-192.
There are 50 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Savaş Tepe This is me

Esat Memişoğlu This is me

Ali Rıza Kural This is me

Publication Date December 3, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2002 Volume: 15 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Tepe, S., Memişoğlu, E., & Kural, A. R. (2016). NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES. Marmara Medical Journal, 15(4), 267-272.
AMA Tepe S, Memişoğlu E, Kural AR. NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES. Marmara Med J. March 2016;15(4):267-272.
Chicago Tepe, Savaş, Esat Memişoğlu, and Ali Rıza Kural. “NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES”. Marmara Medical Journal 15, no. 4 (March 2016): 267-72.
EndNote Tepe S, Memişoğlu E, Kural AR (March 1, 2016) NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES. Marmara Medical Journal 15 4 267–272.
IEEE S. Tepe, E. Memişoğlu, and A. R. Kural, “NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES”, Marmara Med J, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 267–272, 2016.
ISNAD Tepe, Savaş et al. “NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES”. Marmara Medical Journal 15/4 (March 2016), 267-272.
JAMA Tepe S, Memişoğlu E, Kural AR. NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES. Marmara Med J. 2016;15:267–272.
MLA Tepe, Savaş et al. “NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES”. Marmara Medical Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, 2016, pp. 267-72.
Vancouver Tepe S, Memişoğlu E, Kural AR. NONINVASIVE 3-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY RENAL ARTERIES. Marmara Med J. 2016;15(4):267-72.