MEDICAL AUDIT OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING EXAMINATIONS

Yıl 2002, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 27 - 32, 03.12.2016

Ali Türk Erkin Arıbal

Öz

Objective: To audit our mammography
screening practice and evaluate the usefulness of BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon in the classification of mammography findings.
Method: In this study we performed a medical audit of our mammography screening practice between 1 st December 1999- 1st December
2000.
Results: The number of baseline screening examinations were 2007 (67.2%) while the remaining 1041 (32.8%) were performed on women already screened at least once. Recall rate is 3.5%, PPV1 9.9%, PPV2 20%, and PPV3 25%. Overall cancer detection rate is 0.69% for 21 diagnosed cancers. Minimal cancer ratio is 14.3% and axillary lymph node involvement ratio is 33.3%.
Conclusion: Standardisation of mammographie reporting and auditing the data are important in assessing an optimal screening facility. Every mammography screening center should audit its data to improve the outcome and to monitor the effectiveness.
Key Words: Medical audit, BI-RADS
categorisation, Mammography

Kaynakça

• Sickles EA. Quality assurance : how to audit your own mammography practice. Radiol Clin north Am 1992; 30:265-275.
• Nonticciolo DL, Sickles EA. Computerized follow-up of abnormalities detected at
• mammography screening. AJR 1990; 155:751-753
• flaug FJ, Tocino IM, Clayton FD. Automated management of screening and diagnostic mammography. Radiology 1987; 164:747- 752
• Sickles EA, Ominsky Sfl, Sollitto RA. Medical audit of a rapid-throughput mammography screening practice: methotology and results of 27114 examinations. Radiology 1990; 175: 323-327
• Brown M, floun E. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices. AJR 1994; 163:825-829
• Murphy WA Jr, Destouet JM, Monsees BS. Professional quality assurance for mammography screening programs. Radiology 1990; 175:319-323
• Spring DB, Rimbrell-Wilcot R. Evaluating the success of mammography at the local level: how to conduct an audit of your practice. Radiol Clin north Am 1987; 25:983-992
• Ropans DB, D Orsi CJ. Breast imaging reporting and data system. 2 nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 1993;25- 50.
• Robertson CL. A private breast imaging practice: medical audit of 25788 screening and 1077 diagnostic exams. Radiology 1993; 30:265-275
• Linver M, Osuch J, Brenner J. The
• mammography 'audit: a primer for the
• mammography quality standards act (MQSA). AJR 1995; ¡65:19-25
• Moseson D. Audit of mammography in a community setting. Am J Surg 1992; 163:544-546
• Burhenne LJW, I ¡¡slop TG, Burhenne MJ. The British Columbia mammography screening program: evaluation of the first 15 months. AJR 1992; 158:45-49
• Bird RE. Low-cost screening mammography : report on finances and review of 21716 cases. Radiology 1989; 171: 87-90
• Linver MIT, Pater SB, Rosenberg RD. Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teacning courses: 2-year medical audit of 38633 cases. Radiology 1992; 184:39-43
• Tabar L, Fegenberg G. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin ITorth Am 1992; 30:187-210
• A H T u r k , e t a l
• Kinne DW. Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients. Cancer 1991; 67:1196-1198
• Schimidt T, tlartwagner li. Medical audit after 26711 breast imaging studies. Cancer 1998; 83:2516-2520.
• Ropans DB, DOrsi CJ. Breast imaging
• reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 2 nd ed. Reston, VA: American College of
• Radiology, 1995:27-38.
• Bird RE, Wallace TW. Analysis of cancers misses at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617
• Burhenne tIJ, Burhenne LW, Golberg E. Interval breast cancers in the screening mammography programs of British Colombia: analysis and classification. AJR 1994; 162:1072-1075
• Carter CL, Allen C. Relation of tumor size,