Developing a wearable device for upper extremity tremors

Abstract

Objective: This project aims to develop a wearable device to suppress both the essential and resting tremor and investigate its effectiveness. Materials and Methods: This study details the development and assessment of a wearable device for upper extremity tremors. The wearable device underwent a comprehensive design and a prototype was produced with a 3D-printer. To refine the functionality of the prototype, a motor that mimics tremor was attached to a 3D-printed prototype. Then, the printed prototype was applied to the hand model, and tested its effectiveness for tremor suppressing. The wearable device was further investigated on patients with essential tremor and Parkinson`s disease seeking treatment at Neurology Clinics. We recorded the tremor data and processed and visualized the recorded data by using the MatLab (version R2021a, MathWorks Inc., USA) software. Results: The wearable device effectively decreased the tremors both during the simulation phase and the patient testing phase. The data from the wearable device revealed a notable decrease in the amplitude of the tremor. This decrease signifies an achievement of tremor suppression. Conclusion: The prototype of the wearable device signifies a remarkable efficacy in tremor supression. It holds promise for being a potential solution to alleviate the tremor symptoms of essential tremor and Parkinson`s disease patients.

Keywords

• Wearable device
• Essential Tremor
• Parkinson`s Disease

References

1. Lenka A, Jankovic J. Tremor syndromes: An updated review. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 684835. doi: 10.3389/ fneur.2021.684835
2. Louis ED. Diagnosis and management of tremor. Continuum 2016; 22: 1143-58. doi: 10.1212/CON.000.000.0000000346
3. Louis ED. Essential tremor: a nuanced approach to the clinical features. Pract Neurol 2019; 19: 389-98. doi: 10.1136/ practneurol-2018-002183
4. Chen JJ, Swope DM. Essential tremor: diagnosis and treatment. Pharmacotherapy 2003; 23: 1105-22. doi: 10.1592/ phco.23.10.1105.32750
5. Bhatia KP, Bain P, Bajaj N, et al. Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Mov Disord 2018; 33: 75-87. doi: 10.1002/mds.27121
6. Saifee TA. Tremor. Br Med Bull 2019; 130: 51-63. doi: 10.1093/ bmb/ldz017
7. Louis ED, Broussolle E, Goetz CG, Krack P, Kaufmann P, Mazzoni P. Historical underpinnings of the term essential tremor in the late 19th century. Neurology 2008; 71: 856-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.000.032.5564.38165.d1
8. Zesiewicz TA, Kuo SH. Essential tremor. BMJ Clin Evid 2015; 12: 1206-1247.

9. Louis ED, Ottman R. How many people in the USA have essential tremor? Deriving a population estimate based on epidemiological data. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014; 4: 259-9. doi: 10.7916/D8TT4P4B
10. Lorenz D, Schwieger D, Moises H, Deuschl G. Quality of life and personality in essential tremor patients. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 1114-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.20884
11. Louis ED. Etiology of essential tremor: Should we be searching for environmental causes? Mov Disord 2001; 16: 822-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.1183
12. George MS, Lydiard RB. Social phobia secondary to physical disability. A review of benign essential tremor (BET) and stuttering. Psychosomatics 1994; 35: 520-3. doi: 10.1016/ s0033-3182(94)71720-5
13. Traub RE, Gerbin M, Mullaney MM, Louis ED. Development of an essential tremor embarrassment assessment. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2010; 16: 661-665. doi: 10.1016/j. parkreldis.2010.08.017
14. Lonneke ML, Breteler MM. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 525-35. doi: 10.1016/S1474- 4422(06)70471-9
15. Gulcher JR, Jónsson P, Kong A, et al. Mapping of a familial essential tremor gene to chromosome 3q13. Nat Genet 1998; 6: 150-1. doi: 10.1038/ng0997-84
16. Higgins JJ, Pho LT, Nee LE. A gene (ETM) for essential tremor maps to chromosome 2p22-p25. Mov Disord 1997; 12: 859-64. doi: 10.1002/mds.870120605
17. Shatunov A, Sambuughin N, Jankovic J, et al. Genomewide scans in North American families reveal genetic linkage of essential tremor to a region on chromosome 6p23. Brain 2006; 129: 2318-31. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl120
18. Rajput AH, Rajput A. Medical treatment of essential tremor. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis 2014; 6: 29-39. doi: 10.4137/JCNSD. S13570
19. Stefansson H, Steinberg S, Petursson H, et al. Variant in the sequence of the LINGO1 gene confers risk of essential tremor. Nat Genet 2009; 41: 277-9. doi: 10.1038/ng.299
20. Deuschl G, Raethjen J, Hellriegel H, Rodger E. Treatment of patients with essential tremor. Lancet Neurol 2011; 10: 148-61. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70322-7
21. Sharma S, Pandey S. Treatment of essential tremor: current status. Postgrad Med J 2020; 96: 84-93. doi: 10.1136/ postgradmedj-2019-136647
22. Mohammed N, Patra D, Nanda A. A meta-analysis of outcomes and complications of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound in the treatment of essential tremor. Neurosurg Focus 2018; 44: E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.11.FOCUS17628
23. Fromme NP, Camenzind M, Riener R, Rossi MR. Need for mechanically and ergonomically enhanced tremorsuppression orthoses for the upper limb: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2019; 16: 93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12984.019.0543-7
24. Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord 2010; 25: 534-41. doi: 10.1002/ mds.22838
25. Verhoeff MC, Koutris M, Vries R, Berendse HW, Dijk KD, Lobbezoo F. Salivation in Parkinson’s disease: A scoping review. Gerodontology 2023; 40: 26-38. doi: 10.1111/ger.12628
26. Chen LK. Urbanization and population aging: Converging trends of demographic transitions in modern world. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2022; 101: 104709. doi: 10.1016/j. archger.2022.104709
27. Louis ED, Ottman R, Hauser W A. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Estimates of the prevalence of essential tremor throughout the world. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 5-10. doi: 10.1002/mds.870130105
28. Rajput AH, Offord KP, Beard CM, Kurland LT. Essential tremor in Rochester, Minnesota: a 45-year study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47: 466-70. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.5.466
29. Cleeves L, Findley LJ, Koller W. Lack of association between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1988; 24: 23-26. doi: 10.1002/ana.410240106
30. Koller WC, Busenbark K, Miner K. The relationship of essential tremor to other movement disorders: report on 678 patients. Ann Neurol 1994; 35: 717-23. doi: https://doi. org/10.1002/ana.410350613
31. Geraghty JJ, Jankovic J, Zetusky WJ. Association between Essential Tremor and Parkinsons-Disease. Ann Neurol 1985; 17: 329-33. doi: 10.1002/ana.410170404
32. Shahed J, Jankovic J. Exploring the relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2007; 13: 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j. parkreldis.2006.05.033
33. Guler S, Caylan A, Turan FN, Dağdeviren N. The prevalence of essential tremor in Edirne and its counties accompanied comorbid conditions. Neurological Research 2019; 41: 847- 56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616.412.2019.1628409
34. Sur H, İlhan S, Erdoğan H, Öztürk E, Taşdemir M, Börü TU. Prevalence of essential tremor: a door-to-door survey in Sile, Istanbul, Turkey. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009; 15: 101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.03.009
35. Louis ED, Wendt KJ, Pullman SL. Is essential tremor symmetric? Observational data from a community-based study of essential tremor. Arch Neurol 1998; 55: 1553-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.55.12.1553
36. Hewer RL, Cooper R, Morgan MH. An investigation into the value of treating intention tremor by weighting the affected limb. Brain 1972; 95: 579-90. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.3.579
37. Heroux ME, Pari G, Norman KE. The effect of inertial loading on wrist postural tremor in essential tremor. Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 120: 1020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.012
38. Bhidayasiri R, Maytharakcheep S, Phumphid S, Maetzler W. Improving functional disability in patients with tremor: A clinical perspective of the efficacies, considerations, and challenges of assistive technology. J Neurol Sci 2022; 435: 120197. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120197
39. Herrnstadt G, Menon C. Voluntary-driven elbow orthosis with speed-controlled tremor suppression. Front Bioeng and Biotechnol 2016; 4: 29. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/ fbioe.2016.00029
40. Taheri B, Case D, Richer E. Adaptive suppression of severe pathological tremor by Torque Estimation Method. Ieee-Asme Transactions on Mechatronics 2015; 20: 717-27. doi: 10.1109/ TMECH.2014.231.7948
41. Rudraraju S, Nguyen T. Wearable tremor reduction device (TRD) for human hands and arms. Design of Medical Devices Conference 2018; doi: 10.1115/DMD2018-6918
42. Fromme NP, Camenzind M, Riener R, Rossi MR. Design of a lightweight passive orthosis for tremor suppression. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2020; 17: 47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984.020.00673-7
43. Skaramagkas V, Andrikopoulos G, Manesis S. An Experimental Investigation of Essential Hand Tremor Suppression via a Soft Exoskeletal Glove. European Control Conference 2020; 1: 889-94. doi: 10.23919/ECC51009.2020.914.3932
44. Pathak A, Redmond AJ, Allen M, Chou KL. A noninvasive handheld assistive device to accommodate essential tremor: a pilot study. Mov Disord 2014; 29: 838-42. doi: 10.1002/ mds.25796
45. Ryden LE, Matar E, Szeto JYY, Hammond DA, Clouston P, Lewis SJG. Shaken not Stirred: A pilot study testing a gyroscopic spoon stabilization device in Parkinson’s disease and tremor. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020; 23: 409-11. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_251_19