LNG Bunkering Dynamics: An Exploratory Study for Türkiye

Abstract

United Nations’ decarbonization and greenhouse gas reduction targets are to be achieved through the utilization of alternative fuels globally. LNG is a viable alternative for mitigating maritime transport-related greenhouse gas emissions. This study investigates LNG bunkering supply chain development in Türkiye. Semi-structured interviews with bunkering supply chain representatives were conducted to explore phenomena. The results of the research provided a pathway to establish a new supply chain for alternative marine fuels. The research findings indicate that collaboration and setting a regulatory framework are vital for supply chain development.

Keywords

• LNG Bunkering
• LNG as Marine Fuel
• Small-Scale LNG
• Supply Chain

References

1. Aritas. (2021). Company Profile | Arıtaş. Retrieved on March 14, 2021, from https://aritas.com.tr/about
2. Arkas. (2021). News Detail - Arkas Holding S.A. Retrieved on February 22, 2021, from http://www.arkas.com.tr/ennews_detail.html?newsId=1454
3. Aymelek, M., Boulougouris, E. K., Turan, O., & Konovessis, D. (2014) Challenges and opportunities for LNG as a ship fuel source and an application to bunkering network optimisation. In Soares, C. G., & Santos, T. A. (Eds.) Maritime technology and engineering (pp. 767–776). CRC Press/Balkema. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17494
4. Bunkerspot. (2021). EUROPE: LNG bunkering activity soars 272% in Spain - Bunkerspot - Independent Intelligence for the Global Bunker Industry. Retrieved on February 20, 2021, from https://www.bunkerspot.com/europe/52268-europe-lng-bunkering-activity-soars-272-in-spain
5. Calderón, M., Illing, D., & Veiga, J. (2016) Facilities for bunkering of liquefied natural gas in ports. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2431–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.288
6. Cemre. (2021). Cemre Shipyard. Retrieved on February 20, 2021, from https://www.cemreshipyard.com/en
7. Choi, J., & Park, E.-Y. (2019) Comparative study on fuel gas supply systems for LNG bunkering using carbon dioxide and glycol water. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(6), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7060184
8. Cogea. (2017). Study on differentiated port infrastructure charges to promote environmentally friendly maritime transport activities and sustainable transportation. Final Report. Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://www.cogea.it/sites/default/files/2017-06-differentiated-port-infrastructure-charges-report.pdf

9. Doymus, M., & Denktas Sakar, G. (2020). An exploratory study on the perceptions of stakeholders in LNG bunkering supply chain. Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 8(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2020.43255
10. Doymus, M., Denktas Sakar, G., Topaloglu Yildiz, S., & Acik, A. (2022). Small-scale LNG supply chain optimization for LNG bunkering in Turkey. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 162, 107789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107789
11. Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2015). Management and business research. 5th Ed. SAGE Publications Ltd.
12. Eise Fokkema, J., Buijs, P., & Vis, I. F. A. (2017). An investment appraisal method to compare LNG-fueled and conventional vessels. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.021
13. EMRA. (2020). 2019 yılı doğal gaz sektör raporu. Republic of Türkiye, Energy Market Regulatory Authority. Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-0-94/dogal-gazyillik-sektor-raporu Erkmen, T. (2018). The model of pricing of small scale LNG bunker terminal in Turkey. Journal of Naval Sciences and Engineering, 14(2), 71–90.
14. Ge, J., & Wang, X. (2017). Techno-economic study of LNG diesel power (dual fuel) ship. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0120-x
15. Gucma, M., Bąk, A., & Chłopińska, E. (2019). Concept of LNG transfer and bunkering model of vessels at South Baltic Sea area. Annual of Navigation, 25(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/aon-2018-0006
16. IMO. (2015). Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. International Maritime Organization (IMO). Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/Greenhouse-Gas-Studies-2014.aspx
17. IMO. (2020). Fourth IMO Greenhouse Gas Study: Executive Summary. International Maritime Organization (IMO). Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Environment/Documents/Fourth%20IMO%20GHG%20Study%202020%20Executive-Summary.pdf
18. Jafarzadeh, S., Paltrinieri, N., Utne, I. B., & Ellingsen, H. (2017). LNG-fuelled fishing vessels: A systems engineering approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 50, 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.032
19. Jeong, B., Suk Lee, B., & Zhou, P. (2017). Quantitative risk assessment of fuel preparation room having high-pressure fuel gas supply system for LNG fuelled ship. Ocean Engineering, 137, 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.002
20. Kim, K., Park, K., Roh, G., & Chun, K. (2019a). Case study on boil-off gas (BOG) minimization for LNG bunkering vessel using energy storage system (ESS). Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7050130
21. Kim, A.-R., Kwak, D.-W., & Seo, Y.-J. (2019b). Evaluation of liquefied natural gas bunkering port selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 24(3), 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2019.1642311
22. Kim, Y. H., Jung, D. W., Cho, S. K., & Sung, H. G. (2018). Experimental study on hydrodynamic characteristics and operational feasibility of floating LNG bunkering terminal moored side-by-side with LNG Carrier and two LNG bunkering shuttles. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(5), 504–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2018.1430099
23. Kırlı, M. S., & Fahrioğlu, M. (2019). Sustainable development of Turkey: Deployment of geothermal resources for carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 41(14), 1739–1751. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1549149
24. Lam, J. S. L., Chen, D., Cheng, F., & Wong, K. (2011). Assessment of the competitiveness of ports as bunkering hubs: empirical studies on Singapore and Shanghai. Transportation Journal, 50(2), 176-203. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.50.2.0176
25. MOTI. (2020). Deniz Ticareti Genel Müdürlüğü İstatistik Bilgi Sistemi. Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure. Retrieved on June 17, 2020, from https://atlantis.udhb.gov.tr/istatistik/gemi_gecis.aspx
26. MOTI. (2021). Filo İstatistikleri, Filo - Denizcilik İstatistikleri. Ministry of Transport and Infrastructure. Retrieved on March 14, 2021, from https://denizcilikistatistikleri.uab.gov.tr/filo-istatistikleri
27. Öge, K. (2021). Understanding pipeline politics in Eurasia: Turkey’s transit security in natural gas. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1510-1532. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1687447
28. Park, S., Jeong, B., Yoon, J. Y., & Paik, J. K. (2018). A study on factors affecting the safety zone in ship-to-ship LNG bunkering. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(sup1), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2018.1461055
29. Portnews. (2020). Russia’s first LNG-powered RO-RO ferry launched in Turkey. Available at: https://en.portnews.ru/news/300549/ (Accessed: 2 June 2021).
30. Sefine. (2021). Project Detail | Sefine Shipyard, NB52 - NB53 | 5700 m3 Live Fish Carrier. Retrieved on June 2, 2021, from https://sefine.com.tr/Project/Project_Detail/40
31. Sanmar. (2021a). Are you looking for a proven design and quality tug boats for sale. Retrieved on June 2, 2021, from http://sanmartugboat.com/tugboats/
32. Sanmar. (2021b). Sanmar to Build Five Technologically Advanced Tugs to Serve LNG Canada - Sanmar Shipyards. Retrieved on June 2, 2021, from https://www.sanmar.com.tr/sanmar-to-build-five-technologically-advanced-tugs-to-serve-lng-canada/
33. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019) Research methods for business students. 8th Ed. Pearson.
34. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2010) Research methods for business students. 5th Ed. Pearson.
35. Schinas, O., & Butler, M. (2016). Feasibility and commercial considerations of LNG-fueled ships. Ocean Engineering, 122, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.031
36. Sharples, J. (2019). LNG supply chains and the development of LNG as a shipping fuel in northern Europe. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671266
37. Shipandbunker. (2020). LNG bunkering coming to Turkey in 2021 - Ship & Bunker. Retrieved on February 1, 2021, from https://shipandbunker.com/news/emea/694360-lng-bunkering-coming-to-turkey-in-2021
38. Sigma. (2020). Turkey’s energy outlook – A snapshot - Sigma Turkey. Retrieved on June 28, 2020, from https://www.sigmaturkey.com/turkeys-energy-outlook-a-snapshot/
39. Tersan. (2021). Tersan Shipyard. Retrieved on June 2, 2021, from https://www.tersanshipyard.com/projeler
40. Topuz, K. (2019). The missing piece in the Turkey’s gas hub ambitions. IICEC Energy and Climate Research Paper, Sabancı University İstanbul International Center for Energy and Climate. Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/iicec.sabanciuniv.edu/files/2020-11/iicec_energy_and_climate_research paper_the_missing_piece_in_the_turkeys_gas_hub_ambitions_2.pdf
41. UNCTAD. (2019). UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics 2019. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations Publication. Retrieved on July 20, 2022, from https://unctad.org/webflyer/handbook-statistics-2019
42. Wallendorf, M., & Belk, R. W. (1989). Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research. In Hirschman, E. C. (Eds.), SV - Interpretive Consumer Research (pp. 69-84). Association for Consumer Research.
43. Wan, Z., el Makhloufi, A., Chen, Y., & Tang, J. (2018). Decarbonizing the international shipping industry: Solutions and policy recommendations. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 126, 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.064
44. Wang, S., & Notteboom, T. (2014). The adoption of liquefied natural gas as a ship fuel: A systematic review of perspectives and challenges. Transport Reviews, 34(6), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.981884
45. Wang, S., & Notteboom, T. (2015). The role of port authorities in the development of LNG bunkering facilities in North European ports. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 14(1), 61–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-014-0074-9
46. Xu, J., Testa, D., & Mukherjee, P. K. (2015). The use of LNG as a marine fuel: The international regulatory framework. Ocean Development & International Law, 46(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2015.1054744
47. Yoo, B. -Y. (2017). Economic assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a marine fuel for CO2 carriers compared to marine gas oil (MGO). Energy, 121, 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.061