Two Numerical Schemes for the Solution of the Generalized Rosenau Equation with the help of Operator Splitting Techniques
Abstract
Keywords
Generalized Rosenau equation, quintik and cubic B-splines, collocation and Galerkin methods, Splitting techniques
References
- [1] Rosenau, P.: Dynamics of dense discrete systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics. 79 (5), 1028-1042 (1988).
- [2] Chung, S. K.: Finite difference approximate solutions for the Rosenau equation. Applicable Analysis. 69 (1-2), 149-156 (1998).
- [3] Rosenau, P.: A quasi-continuous description of a non -linear transmissionline.Physica Scripta. 34, 827-829 (1986).
- [4] Park, M. A.: On the Rosenau equation. Math. Appl. Comput. 9, 145-152 (1990).
- [5] Chung,S. K., Ha, S. N.: Finite element Galerkin solutions for the Rosenau equation. Applicable Analysis.54, 30-56 (1994).
- [6] Manickam, S. A., Pani, A. K., Chung, S. K.: A second-order splitting combined with orthogonal cubik spline collocation method for the Rosenau equation. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations: An International Journal. 14, 695-716 (1998).
- [7] Lee, H. Y., Ohm, M. R., Shin, J. Y.: The convergence of fully discrete Galerkin approximations of the Rosenau equation. The Korean Journal of Computational & Applied Mathematics. 6 (1), 1-13 (1999).
- [8] Sportisse, B.: An analysis of operator splitting techniques in the Stiff case. Journal of Computational Physics. 161, 140-168 (2000). https://doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6495.
- [9] Chung, S. K., Pani, A. K.: Numerical methods for the Rosenau equation. Applicable Analysis. 77, 351-369 (2001).
- [10] Chung, S. K., Pani, A. K.: A second order splitting lumped mass finite element method for the Rosenau equation. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. 15, 331-351 (2004).