Functional Outcomes of Patients Treated with Fibula Strut Graft and Double Plate in the Treatment of Recalcitrant Humerus Nonunions
Abstract
Objective: Recalcitrant humerus nonunion is challenging to treat, and plate fixation is a common treatment choice. This study aimed to determine the efficiency of double plating combined with nonvascularized autologous fibular strut allograft in the treatment of atrophic and defective humerus nonunions.
Methods: Fourteen patients were surgically treated for recalcitrant humerus malunions. Demographic data (age, gender, dominant side), clinical features, and previous surgical records of the patients were recorded preoperatively. Preoperative Visual Analogous Scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley scores of the patients were recorded before the surgery.
Results: 10 (71.4%) of the patients were female, and 4 (28.5%) were male. The mean age was 53.07±9.69 (range, 39-67). 9 (64.3%) of the patients had nonunions on the dominant side. The mean follow-up was 11.14±1.9 months. The complete union was observed in all patients, and the mean union time was 5.1±0.63 months (range, 4.2-6.0). The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.29 ± 0.91 (range, 6-9), and the mean postoperative VAS score was 0.93 ± 0.92 (range, 0-3). VAS scores improved after the surgery (p<0.001). The mean preoperative Constant-Murley score was 53.57 ± 12.17 (range 34-72), and the mean postoperative Constant-Murley score was 86.00 ± 9.21. Constant-Murley scores improved after the surgery (p<0.001). Gender (p=0.635), dominant side involvement (p=0.112), and age (p=0.925) did not correlate with union time.
Conclusion: Double plating with autologous nonvascularized fibular grafts is a successful treatment option for recalcitrant humerus atrophic nonunions, especially with bony defects.
Methods: Fourteen patients were surgically treated for recalcitrant humerus malunions. Demographic data (age, gender, dominant side), clinical features, and previous surgical records of the patients were recorded preoperatively. Preoperative Visual Analogous Scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley scores of the patients were recorded before the surgery.
Results: 10 (71.4%) of the patients were female, and 4 (28.5%) were male. The mean age was 53.07±9.69 (range, 39-67). 9 (64.3%) of the patients had nonunions on the dominant side. The mean follow-up was 11.14±1.9 months. The complete union was observed in all patients, and the mean union time was 5.1±0.63 months (range, 4.2-6.0). The mean preoperative VAS score was 7.29 ± 0.91 (range, 6-9), and the mean postoperative VAS score was 0.93 ± 0.92 (range, 0-3). VAS scores improved after the surgery (p<0.001). The mean preoperative Constant-Murley score was 53.57 ± 12.17 (range 34-72), and the mean postoperative Constant-Murley score was 86.00 ± 9.21. Constant-Murley scores improved after the surgery (p<0.001). Gender (p=0.635), dominant side involvement (p=0.112), and age (p=0.925) did not correlate with union time.
Conclusion: Double plating with autologous nonvascularized fibular grafts is a successful treatment option for recalcitrant humerus atrophic nonunions, especially with bony defects.
Keywords
recalcitrant humerus nonunion, double plating, nonvaskularized fibula grafts
References
- 1. Borus TA, Yian EH, Karunakar MA. A case series and review of salvage surgery for refractory humeral shaft nonunion following two or more prior surgical procedures. The IOWA Orthopaedic journal. 2005;25:194.
- 2. Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Nonunions of the humerus. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007). 2004;419:46-50.
- 3. Rupp M, Biehl C, Budak M, Thormann U, Heiss C, Alt V. Diaphyseal long bone nonunions—types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations. International orthopaedics. 2018;42(2):247-58.
- 4. Mast JW, Spiegel PG, Harvey Jr JP, Harrison C. Fractures of the humeral shaft: a retrospective study of 240 adult fractures. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1975(112):254-62.
- 5. Babhulkar S, Babhulkar S, Vasudev A. Recalcitrant aseptic atrophic non-union of the shaft of the humerus after failure of surgical treatment: management by excision of non-union, bone grafting and stabilization by LCP in different modes. Injury. 2017;48:S33-S43.
- 6. Rubel IF, Kloen P, Campbell D, Schwartz M, Liew A, Myers E, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral nonunions: a biomechanical and clinical study. JBJS. 2002;84(8):1315-22.
- 7. Muramatsu K, Doi K, Ihara K, Shigetomi M, Kawai S. Recalcitrant posttraumatic nonunion of the humerus: 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft: 23 patients reconstructed with vascularized bone graft. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 2003;74(1):95-7.
- 8. Badman BL, Mighell M, Kalandiak SP, Prasarn M. Proximal humeral nonunions treated with fixed-angle locked plating and an intramedullary strut allograft. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2009;23(3):173-9.
- 9. Wright TW, Miller GJ, Vander Griend RA, Wheeler D, Dell PC. Reconstruction of the humerus with an intramedullary fibular graft. A clinical and biomechanical study. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British volume. 1993;75(5):804-7.
- 10. Celik D. Turkish version of the modified Constant-Murley score and standardized test protocol: reliability and validity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(1):69-75.