Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2024, , 109 - 118, 31.08.2024

Pınar Yıldız , Esra Talay Çevlik , Goknil Alkan Demetoğlu

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1529356

Abstract

Ethical Statement

‘Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Denture Liner Material on Denture Base Resins’ isimli çalışmamın çalışmanın özgün bir çalışma olduğunu, çalışmamızın hazırlık veri toplama, Analiz ve bilgilerin sunumu olmak üzere tüm aşamalarında bilimsel etik ilk eve kurallarına uygun davranıldığımı; bu çalışma kapsamında elde edilmeyen tüm veri ve bilgiler için kaynak gösterdiğimi ve bu kaynaklara referanslar kısmında yer verdiğimi;kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir değişiklik yapmadığımı, çalışmanın Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)’in tüm şartlarini ve koşullarini kabulederek etik görev ve sorumluluklara riayet ettiğimi beyan ederim. Bu çalışma kapsamında herhangi bir anket, mülakat, odak grup çalışması, gözlem, deney, ya da başka görüşme teknikleri kullanılarak katılımcılardan veri toplamadığımı, insan ve hayvanlar üzerinde deney, vb. yapmadığımı, kişisel verilerin korunması kanununu ihlal etmediğimi, sorumlu yazar olarak bu belgenin doldurulması noktasında diğer yazarları bilgilendirdiğimi bildirir; bu çalışmanın etik kurul izni gerektirmeyen çalışmalardan olduğunu sorumlu yazar olarak beyan ederim. Herhangi bir zamanda, çalışmayla ilgili yaptığım bu beyana ayrkırı bir durumun saptanması durumunda, ortaya çıkacak tüm ahlaki ve hukuki sonuçlara razı olduğumu bildiririm. Sorumlu Yazar Dr Pınar YILDIZ

References

  • 1. Aguirre BC, Chen J-H, Kontogiorgos ED, Murchison DF, Nagy WW. Flexural strength of DB acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123: 641-6.
  • 2. Choi JJE, Uy CE, Plaksina P, Ramani RS, Ganjigatti R, Waddell JN. Bond strength of denture teeth to heat‐cured, CAD/CAM and 3D printed denture acrylics. J Prosthodont 2020; 29: 415-21.
  • 3. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012: 477-8.
  • 4. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of DB adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 249-56.
  • 5. Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 40-6.
  • 6. Kim B-J, Yang H-S, Chun M-G, Park Y-J. Shore hardness and tensile bond strength of long-term soft denture lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1289-97.
  • 7. Hashem MI. Advances in soft denture liners: An update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16: 314-8.
  • 8. Şeker H, Okutan Y, Demetoğlu GA. Effect Of Air-Abrasion And Er: Yag Laser On The Bond Strength Between The Metal Housing Of An Overdenture Attachment System And The Hard Relining Material. Meandros Med Dent J 2024; 25: 51-6.
  • 9. Khanna A, Bhatnagar VM, Karani JT, Madria K, Mistry S. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between two commercially available heat cured resilient liners and DB resin with different surface treatments. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 30.
  • 10. Pisani MX, Malheiros‐Segundo AdL, Balbino KL, Souza RdF, Paranhos HdFO, Lovato da Silva CH. Oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients after denture relining with a silicone‐based soft liner. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 474-80.
  • 11. Sônego MV, Neto CLMM, Dos Santos DM, de Melo Moreno AL, de Magalhães Bertoz AP, Goiato MC. Quality of life, satisfaction, occlusal force, and halitosis after direct and indirect relining of inferior complete dentures. Eur J Dent 2022; 16: 215-222.
  • 12. Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different DB resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 259-66.
  • 13. Jagger RG, al-Athel MS, Jagger DC, Vowles RW. Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 55-8.
  • 14. Li P, Kraemer-Fernandez P, Klink A, Xu Y, Spintzyk S. Repairability of a 3D printed DB polymer: Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 114: 104227.
  • 15. Awad AN, Cho S-H, Kesterke MJ, Chen J-H. Comparison of tensile bond strength of denture reline materials on DBs fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 129: 616-22.
  • 16. Vuksic J, Pilipovic A, Poklepovic Pericic T, Kranjcic J. Tensile bond strength between different DB materials and soft denture liners. Materials 2023; 16: 4615.
  • 17. Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CK, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin DBs. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 699-705.
  • 18. Aydın A, Terzioğlu H, Akınay A, Ulubayram K, Hasırcı N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 211-8.
  • 19. Wemken G, Burkhardt F, Spies BC, et al. Bond strength of conventional, subtractive, and additive manufactured DBs to soft and hard relining materials. Dent Mater 2021; 37: 928-38.
  • 20. Azpiazu-Flores FX, Schricker SR, Seghi RR, Johnston WM, Del Rio DL. Adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM DB polymers and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate with thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131: 494-9.
  • 21. Pinto JRR, Mesquita MF, de Arruda Nóbilo MA, Henriques GEP. Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 288-293.
  • 22. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran III A, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to DB resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 368-71.
  • 23. Bayati OH, Yunus N, Ahmad SF. Tensile bond strengths of silicone soft liners to two chemically different DB resins. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012; 34: 32-7.
  • 24. Gibreel M, Perea-Lowery L, Garoushi S, Wada J, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of autopolymerizing repair resin to DB materials processed with different technologies. J Prosthodont Res 2024; 23: 00149.
  • 25. Kimoto S, Kimoto K, Gunji A et al. Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of an acrylic based resilient liner on perceived chewing ability in edentulous patients wearing mandibular complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 110–116

Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Denture Liner Material on Denture Base Resins

Year 2024, , 109 - 118, 31.08.2024

Pınar Yıldız , Esra Talay Çevlik , Goknil Alkan Demetoğlu

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1529356

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the tensile bond strength (TBS) of a silicone-based soft denture liner material on denture bases produced via conventional, subtractive, and additive manufacturing techniques and examine the effect of aluminum oxide particle abrasion (APA) on TBS.
Material and Methods: A total of 48 cylindrical denture base resin samples were manufactured using three different techniques: conventional, subtractive, and additive manufacturing. The samples were divided into two groups: control and APA. All samples were separated at the center, and the soft liner was applied to the corresponding surfaces. The specimens then underwent TBS testing. Data were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc tests.
Results: Two-way ANOVA results indicated a significant difference among the denture base resins, while no significant difference was found between the control and APA groups. The highest TBS was observed in the subtractive-manufactured APA group, while the lowest TBS was in the additive-manufactured APA group. Significant differences were found between the subtractive and additive-manufactured groups (p=0.022).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that TBS varies with the DB's manufacturing technique. While APA increased TBS in subtractive manufacturing, it had no statistically significant effect. Further research should explore different soft lining materials and consider in vivo conditions for more comprehensive insights.

Keywords

Denture base resins Denture liners Tensile bond strength

References

  • 1. Aguirre BC, Chen J-H, Kontogiorgos ED, Murchison DF, Nagy WW. Flexural strength of DB acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods. J Prosthet Dent 2020; 123: 641-6.
  • 2. Choi JJE, Uy CE, Plaksina P, Ramani RS, Ganjigatti R, Waddell JN. Bond strength of denture teeth to heat‐cured, CAD/CAM and 3D printed denture acrylics. J Prosthodont 2020; 29: 415-21.
  • 3. Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012: 477-8.
  • 4. Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of DB adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 116: 249-56.
  • 5. Inokoshi M, Kanazawa M, Minakuchi S. Evaluation of a complete denture trial method applying rapid prototyping. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 40-6.
  • 6. Kim B-J, Yang H-S, Chun M-G, Park Y-J. Shore hardness and tensile bond strength of long-term soft denture lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1289-97.
  • 7. Hashem MI. Advances in soft denture liners: An update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16: 314-8.
  • 8. Şeker H, Okutan Y, Demetoğlu GA. Effect Of Air-Abrasion And Er: Yag Laser On The Bond Strength Between The Metal Housing Of An Overdenture Attachment System And The Hard Relining Material. Meandros Med Dent J 2024; 25: 51-6.
  • 9. Khanna A, Bhatnagar VM, Karani JT, Madria K, Mistry S. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between two commercially available heat cured resilient liners and DB resin with different surface treatments. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 30.
  • 10. Pisani MX, Malheiros‐Segundo AdL, Balbino KL, Souza RdF, Paranhos HdFO, Lovato da Silva CH. Oral health related quality of life of edentulous patients after denture relining with a silicone‐based soft liner. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 474-80.
  • 11. Sônego MV, Neto CLMM, Dos Santos DM, de Melo Moreno AL, de Magalhães Bertoz AP, Goiato MC. Quality of life, satisfaction, occlusal force, and halitosis after direct and indirect relining of inferior complete dentures. Eur J Dent 2022; 16: 215-222.
  • 12. Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different DB resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 259-66.
  • 13. Jagger RG, al-Athel MS, Jagger DC, Vowles RW. Some variables influencing the bond strength between PMMA and a silicone denture lining material. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 55-8.
  • 14. Li P, Kraemer-Fernandez P, Klink A, Xu Y, Spintzyk S. Repairability of a 3D printed DB polymer: Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 114: 104227.
  • 15. Awad AN, Cho S-H, Kesterke MJ, Chen J-H. Comparison of tensile bond strength of denture reline materials on DBs fabricated with CAD-CAM technology. J Prosthet Dent 2023; 129: 616-22.
  • 16. Vuksic J, Pilipovic A, Poklepovic Pericic T, Kranjcic J. Tensile bond strength between different DB materials and soft denture liners. Materials 2023; 16: 4615.
  • 17. Choi JE, Ng TE, Leong CK, Kim H, Li P, Waddell JN. Adhesive evaluation of three types of resilient denture liners bonded to heat-polymerized, autopolymerized, or CAD-CAM acrylic resin DBs. J Prosthet Dent 2018; 120: 699-705.
  • 18. Aydın A, Terzioğlu H, Akınay A, Ulubayram K, Hasırcı N. Bond strength and failure analysis of lining materials to denture resin. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 211-8.
  • 19. Wemken G, Burkhardt F, Spies BC, et al. Bond strength of conventional, subtractive, and additive manufactured DBs to soft and hard relining materials. Dent Mater 2021; 37: 928-38.
  • 20. Azpiazu-Flores FX, Schricker SR, Seghi RR, Johnston WM, Del Rio DL. Adhesive strength of 3 long-term resilient liners to CAD-CAM DB polymers and heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate with thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131: 494-9.
  • 21. Pinto JRR, Mesquita MF, de Arruda Nóbilo MA, Henriques GEP. Evaluation of varying amounts of thermal cycling on bond strength and permanent deformation of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 288-293.
  • 22. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran III A, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to DB resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 368-71.
  • 23. Bayati OH, Yunus N, Ahmad SF. Tensile bond strengths of silicone soft liners to two chemically different DB resins. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2012; 34: 32-7.
  • 24. Gibreel M, Perea-Lowery L, Garoushi S, Wada J, Lassila L, Vallittu P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of autopolymerizing repair resin to DB materials processed with different technologies. J Prosthodont Res 2024; 23: 00149.
  • 25. Kimoto S, Kimoto K, Gunji A et al. Randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of an acrylic based resilient liner on perceived chewing ability in edentulous patients wearing mandibular complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 110–116
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Pınar Yıldız 0000-0002-8090-2885

Esra Talay Çevlik 0000-0002-8898-6710

Goknil Alkan Demetoğlu 0000-0002-8280-8577

Early Pub Date August 28, 2024
Publication Date August 31, 2024
Submission Date August 7, 2024
Acceptance Date August 21, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

EndNote Yıldız P, Talay Çevlik E, Alkan Demetoğlu G (August 1, 2024) Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Soft Denture Liner Material on Denture Base Resins. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 25 2 109–118.