KOMPOZİT VE KOMPOMERİN FARKLI KALSİYUM SİLİKAT BAZLI SİMANLARA MAKASLAMA BAĞLANMA KUVVETİ

Year 2024, Volume: 25 Issue: 4, 337 - 350, 22.12.2024

Fatih Öznurhan , Fatıma Kübra Altınay Karaca

https://doi.org/10.69601/meandrosmdj.1562662

Abstract

Amaç: Farklı adeziv sistemlerin ve restoratiflerin farklı kalsiyum silikat bazlı simanlara olan makaslama bağlanma kuvvetinin değerlendirilmesidir.
Materyal ve metot: NeoMTA2, NeoPutty and TheraCalPT kalsiyum silikat bazlı siman olarak kullanılmıştır. Ortasında delik bulunan 120 akrilik blok hazırlanmış ve 3 gruba (n=40) ayrılmıştır. Kalsiyum silikat simanlar kavitelere yerleştirilmiş, her grup iki alt gruba bölünmüş ve adezivler (Prime &BondNT ve üniversal adeziv (Scotchbond) uygulanmıştır. Her bir gruba kompozit (n=10) ve kompomer (n=10) uygulanmış ve polimerize edilmiştir. Her örnek 37oC’de 100% nemli ortamda 24 saat bekletilmiş ve üniversal test cihazında makaslama bağlanma kuvvetleri ölçülmüştür. Kırılma tipleri SEM ve stereo mikroskopta değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: TheraCal PT diğer materyaller ile karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak yüksek makaslama bağlanma kuvveti göstermiştir(p<0.05). NeoMTA ve NeoPutty’nin makaslama bağlanma kuvveti istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark göstermemiştir(p>0.05). Adeziv sistemler ve restoratif materyaller arasındaki anlamlı bir fark görülmemiştir(p>0.05).
Sonuçlar: Theracal PT’nin kullanım kolaylığı ve rezin restoratif materyallere olan yüksek bağlanma kuvveti pulpa tedavilerinde uygun olduğu fikrine destek sağlamaktadır. Bununla birlikte invitro şartlar gerçek ağzı ortamını tam olarak yansıtmayacağı için materyalin gerçek performansı ve klinik kullanılabilirliğini desteklemek için klinik çalışmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

Keywords

NeoMTA, NeoPutty, TheraCal PT, kompozit, kompomer, makaslama bağlanma kuvveti

Ethical Statement

Cumhuriyet University Clinical Research Ethic Committee (2021-11/10)

Supporting Institution

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund Cumhuriyet University (Grant number DİŞ-2022-286).

Project Number

Grant number DİŞ-2022-286

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF DIFFERENT CALCIUM SILICATE BASED CEMENTS TO COMPOSITE AND COMPOMER

Abstract

Aim:To evaluate shear bond strength(SBS)of three different calcium silicate cements(CSC)with different adhesive systems and restoratives. Materials and methods:NeoMTA2, NeoPutty and TheraCalPT were used as CSC.120 acrylic blocks with a hole in the middle were prepared and divided into three groups(n=40) depending on the CSC used.CSCs were placed in the prepared cavities. Each group was divided into two subgroups and adhesives(Prime&BondNT) and Universal adhesive (Scotchbond)were applied.Then, composite(n=10) and compomer(n=10)were applied and polymerized.The prepared samples were kept at 37oC in a 100% humid environment for 24 hours and shear bond strength test(SBS) was performed with an universal testing device. Fracture types were evaluated using stereomicroscope and SEM.Results: TheraCalPT had statistically significant increased SBS values when compared to other materials(p<0.05). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant difference between the SBS values of NeoMTA and NeoPutty(p>0.05).The difference between the adhesive systems and the restorative materials themselves was not significant (p>0.05).Conclusion:The ease of use of TheraCalPT and its strong bonding ability with resin restorative materials may provide support for the idea that it is suitable for pulp interventions.However, since in vitro environmental conditions do not reflect intraoral conditions,it must be supported by clinical studies to understand the actual performance and clinical usability.

Keywords

NeoMTA, NeoPutty, TheraCal PT, composite, compomer, shear bond

Ethical Statement

17.11.2021 - 2021-11/10

Supporting Institution

Sivas Cumhuriyet University

Project Number

Grant number DİŞ-2022-286

References

• 1. Tziafas D, Smith A, Lesot H. Designing new treatment strategies in vital pulp therapy. Journal of dentistry 28 (2000) 77-92.
• 2. da Rosa WL, Cocco AR, Silva TMd, Mesquita LC, Galarca AD, Silva AFd, et al. C urrent trends and future perspectives of dental pulp capping materials: A systematic review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 106 (2018) 1358-68.
• 3. Ba-Hattab R, Al-Jamie M, Aldreib H, Alessa L, Alonazi M. Calcium hydroxide in endodontics: An overview. Open Journal of Stomatology 6 (2016) 274-89.
• 4. Luo Z, Li D, Kohli MR, Yu Q, Kim S, He W-x. Effect of biodentine™ on the proliferation, migration and adhesion of human dental pulp stem cells. Journal of Dentistry 42 (2014) 490-97.
• 5. Rodríguez-Lozano F, Lozano A, López-García S, García-Bernal D, Sanz J, Guerrero-Gironés J, et al. Biomineralization potential and biological properties of a new tantalum oxide (ta 2 o 5)–containing calcium silicate cement. Clinical Oral Investigations 26(2022)1-15.
• 6. Sun Q, Meng M, Steed JN, Sidow SJ, Bergeron BE, Niu L-n, et al. Manoeuvrability and biocompatibility of endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putties. Journal of dentistry 104 (2021) 103530.
• 7. Primus C, Gutmann JL, Tay FR, Fuks AB. Calcium silicate and calcium aluminate cements for dentistry reviewed. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 105 (2022) 1841-63.
• 8. Küden C, Karakaş SN, Batmaz SG. Comparative chemical properties, bioactivity, and cytotoxicity of resin-modified calcium silicate–based pulp capping materials on human dental pulp stem cells. Clinical Oral Investigations 26 (2022) 6839-53.
• 9. Çapan BŞ, Akyüz S. Current fluoride-releasing restorative materials used in pediatric dentistry. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences 6 (2016) 129-34.
• 10. Oskoee SS, Bahari M, Kimyai S, Motahhari P, Eghbal MJ, Asgary S. Shear bond strength of calcium enriched mixture cement and mineral trioxide aggregate to composite resin with two different adhesive systems. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran) 11 (2014) 665-71.
• 11. Nie E, Yu J, Jiang R, Liu X, Li X, Islam R, et al. Effectiveness of direct pulp capping bioactive materials in dentin regeneration: A systematic review. Materials 14 (2021) 6811.
• 12. Biçer H, Bayrak Ş. Vital pulpa tedavisinde kullanılan kalsiyum silikat içerikli biyomateryallerin restoratif materyallere bağlanma dayanımının değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dental Journal 6 (2019) 271-79.
• 13. NuSmile. Available from: Https://tp-dc.Com.Au/products/nusmile-neomta-2-starter-kit-1-0gm. Accessed on 29 January 2023.
• 14. Persson C, Engqvist H. Premixed calcium silicate cement for endodontic applications: Injectability, setting time and radiopacity. Biomatter 1 (2011) 76-80.
• 15. Yeniçeri Özata M, Falakaloğlu S, Plotino G, Adıgüzel Ö. The micro-shear bond strength of new endodontic tricalcium silicate-based putty: An in vitro study. Aust Endod J 49 (2022) 124-129.
• 16. NuSmile. Available from: Https://nusmile.Com/pages/nusmile-neoputty2. 2020 Accessed on 29 January 2023.
• 17. Yavuz Y. Biomateryallerin üniversal adeziv sistemlere bağlanma dayanımının karşılaştırılması: İn vitro çalışma. Selcuk Dental Journal 9 (2022) 513-19.
• 18. İpek İ, Ünal M, Güner A, Candan M. Push-out bond strength of biodentine, mta repair hp, and a new pre-mixed neoputty bioactive cement: Scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy analysis. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society 58 (2022) 1-9.
• 19. İpek İ, BK E, Yıldız Ş, Ataş O, Ünal M. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of biodentine, pre-mixed neoputty and new resin modified calcium silica cement with bulk fill composites; scanning electron microscopy-energy distributed x-ray spectroscopy analysis. (2023).
• 20. Alqahtani AS, Sulimany AM, Alayad AS, Alqahtani AS, Bawazir OA. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of four bioceramic materials with different restorative materials and timings. Materials 15 (2022) 4668.
• 21. Sismanoglu S, Yildirim-Bilmez Z, Gurcan A, Gumustas B. Influence of application mode of universal adhesive on the surface morphology, elemental composition and bond strength of calcium silicate-based cements to composite resin: A sem-edx microanalysis study. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 36 (2022) 1833-46.
• 22. Akbiyik SY, Bakir EP, Bakir Se. Evaluation of the bond strength of different pulp capping materials to dental adhesive systems: An in vitro study. Journal of Advanced Oral Research 12 (2021) 286-95.
• 23. Bayrak S, Tunc ES, Saroglu I, Egilmez T. Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to white mineral trioxide aggregate. Dental materials journal 28 (2009) 62-67.
• 24. Atabek D, Sillelioğlu H, Ölmez A. Bond strength of adhesive systems to mineral trioxide aggregate with different time intervals. Journal of endodontics 38 (2012) 1288-92.
• 25. Tunç EŞ, Bayrak Ş, Eğilmez T. The evaluation of bond strength of a composite and a compomer to white mineral trioxide aggregate with two different bonding systems. Journal of Endodontics 34 (2008) 603-05.
• 26. Kayahan M, Nekoofar MH, Kazandağ M, Canpolat C, Malkondu O, Kaptan F, et al. Effect of acid‐etching procedure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. International endodontic journal 42 (2009) 1004-14.
• 27. Namazikhah M, Nekoofar MH, Sheykhrezae M, Salariyeh S, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, et al. The effect of ph on surface hardness and microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. International Endodontic Journal 41 (2008) 108-16.
• 28. Lee Y-L, Lee B-S, Lin F-H, Lin AY, Lan W-H, Lin C-P. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 787-93.
• 29. Keleş S, Derelioğlu SŞ. Shear bond strength of composite and compomer to biodentine® applied with various bonding agents: An in-vitro study. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 (2019) 49-54.
• 30. Tulumbaci F, Almaz ME, Arikan V, Mutluay MS. Shear bond strength of different restorative materials to mineral trioxide aggregate and biodentine. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD 20 (2017) 292.
• 31. Al-Sarheed MA. Evaluation of shear bond strength and sem observation of all-in-one self-etching primer used for bonding of fissure sealants. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 7 (2007) 9-16.
• 32. Davidson C, De Gee A, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. Journal of dental research 63 (1984) 1396-99.