Comparison of Cameriere and Demirjian Methods for Estimating Adulthood in Turkish Population

Year 2022, Volume: 23 Issue: 3, 275 - 281, 30.09.2022

Belde Arsan , Merve Şakır , Cansu Büyük , Erdoğan Fişekçioğlu , Gözde Kurt

Abstract

Objective: The current study compares diagnostic performances of Demirjian’s mineralization stage (DS) and Cameriere’s third molar maturity index (I3M) on estimating adulthood in Turkish individuals and to investigate a more suitable cutoff value in a sample Turkish population.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a sample of digital panoramic images of 512 healthy individuals aged between 14 and 23 years old. The diagnostic capabilities were tested with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensivities, specificity were evaluated and post-test probabilities were calculated with Bayes’s theorem.
Results: The areas under the ROC were 0.88 for DS and 0.89 for I3M. The sensitivity and the specifities of H stage were 41.4%, 97.9% for females and 64.3%, 93.4% for males, and I3M<0.08 were 46.8%, 97.4% for females and 71.4%, 92.6% for males. The cut-off of the dataset I3M<0.2 performed better for females, increasing sensitivity to 73.9%, post-test probability to 80.9% while decreasing specificity to 87.2%.
Conclusion: I3M<0.2 performed better for females with higher sensitivity values while lowering the highest specificity values. Concerning legal rights and ethics, I 3M<0.08 or H stage provide the most accurate and consistent results in adulthood determination in males, whereas in females I3M<0.08 and I3M<0.2 provide sufficient results when a test with the highest specificity is sought.

Keywords

Age estimation , Turkey , dental age , third molar index , forensic dentistry

References

• 1. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, et al. Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 2008; 122: 457-60.
• 2. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, De Angelis D, Scarpino F, Galli F. The comparison between measurement of open apices of third molars and Demirjian stages to test chronological age of over 18 year olds in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 2008; 122: 493-7.
• 3. Karataş OH, Öztürk F, Dedeoğlu N, Çolak C, Altun O. Radiographic evaluation of third-molar development in relation to the chronological age of Turkish children in the southwest Eastern Anatolia region. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 232: 238.e1-5.
• 4. Zandi M, Shokri A, Malekzadeh H, Amini P, Shafiey P. Evaluation of third molar development and its relation to chronological age: a panoramic radiographic study. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 19: 183-9.
• 5. Cavrić J, Galić I, Vodanović M, Brkić H, Gregov J, Viva S, et al. Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority in a black African population in Botswana. Int J Legal Med 2016; 130: 1109-20.
• 6. De Luca S, Biagi R, Begnoni G, Farronato G, Cingolani M, Merelli V, et al. Accuracy of Cameriere’s cut-off value for third molar in assessing 18 years of age. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 235: 102.e1-6.
• 7. Galić I, Lauc T, Brkić H, Vodanović M, Galić E, Biazevic MG, et al. Cameriere’s third molar maturity index in assessing age of majority. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 252: 191.e1-5.
• 8. Population by years, age group and sex 1935-2018. Turkish Statistical Institute (accessed on 07.08.2019).
• 9. Turkish Criminal Code Law number: 5237 Article: 31. Accepted date: 26.09.2004, Official Gazette 12.10.2004 (25611).
• 10. Turkish Criminal Code, Law number: 5237, Article: 103, 104. Accepted date: 26.09.2004, Official Gazette 12.10.2004 (25611).
• 11. Hunter J, Roberts C, Martin A. Forensic Anthropology. In: Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology. 1st Edition. Routledge; 1995: 111.
• 12. Costa J, Montero J, Serrano S, Albaladejo A, López-Valverde A, Bica. Accuracy in the legal age estimation according to the third molars mineralization among Mexicans and Columbians. Aten Primaria 2014; 46: 165-75.
• 13. Quispe Lizarbe RJ, Solís Adrianzén C, Quezada-Márquez MM, Galić I, Cameriere R. Demirjian's stages and Cameriere's third molar maturity index to estimate legal adult age in Peruvian population. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2017; 25: 59-65.
• 14. Gulsahi A, De Luca S, Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Cameriere R. Accuracy of the third molar index for assessing the legal majority of 18 years in Turkish population. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 266: 584.e1-6.
• 15. Thevissen PW, Fieuws S, Willems G. Human third molars development: Comparison of 9 country specific populations. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 201: 102-5.
• 16. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973; 45: 211-27.
• 17. Olze A, Schmeling A, Taniguchi M, Maeda H, van Niekerk P, Wernecke KD, et al. Forensic age estimation in living subjects: the ethnic factor in wisdom tooth mineralization. Int J Legal Med 2004; 118: 170-3.
• 18. Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE. The A.B.F.O. study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38: 379-90.
• 19. Kelmendi J, Cameriere R, Ko ani F, Galić I, Mehmeti B, Vodanović M. The third molar maturity index in indicating the legal adult age in Kosovar population. Int J Legal Med 2018; 132: 1151-9.
• 20. Balla SB, Galic I, Karunakar P, Vanin S, De Luca S, Cameriere R. Validation of third molar maturity index (I3M) for discrimination of juvenile/adult status in South Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2017; 49: 2-7.
• 21. Ribier L, Saint-Martin P, Seignier M, Paré A, Brunereau L, Rérolle C. Cameriere's third molar maturity index in assessing age of majority: a study of a French sample. Int J Legal Med 2020; 134: 783-92.
• 22. Akkaya N, Yilanci HÖ. Assessment of third molar maturity index for legal age threshold of 18 in a sample of Turkish individuals. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 2021; 53: 314-24.