Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2018, Volume: 19 Issue: 4, 302 - 309, 31.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.70299

Abstract

References

  • 1. Brueckner C, Schneider H, Haak R. Shear Bond Strength and Tooth-Composite Interaction With Self-Adhering Flowable Composites. Oper Dent 2017; 42: 90-100.
  • 2. Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M, et al. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage of Class I Flowable Resin Composite Restorations. Oper Dent 2017; 42: E16-E23.
  • 3. Kawai T, Maseki T, Nara Y. Bonding of flowable resin composite restorations to class 1 occlusal cavities with and without cyclic load stress. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 408-17.
  • 4. Karadas M. The effect of different beverages on the color and translucency of flowable composites. Scanning 2016; 38: 701-9.
  • 5. Tarcin B, Gumru B, Peker S, Ovecoglu HS. Evaluation of Radiopacity of Bulk-fill Flowable Composites Using Digital Radiography. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 424-31.
  • 6. Sumino N, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Shiratsuchi K, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 820-7.
  • 7. Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Van Meerbeek B. Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1201-12.
  • 8. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 348-55.
  • 9. Moslemi M, Fotouhi Ardakani F, Javadi F, Khalili Sadrabad Z, Shadkar Z, Shadkar MS. Evaluation of Er,Cr\:YSGG Laser Effect on Microshear Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in the Dentin of Permanent Molar: An In Vitro Study. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016; 2016: 4856285.
  • 10. Franz A, Spinell T, Graf A, Wutzel H, Liska R, Watts DC, et al. Cytotoxicity of post and core composites as a function of environmental conditions. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 1179-86.
  • 11. Tadin A, Marovic D, Galic N, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Composite-induced toxicity in human gingival and pulp fibroblast cells. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 304-11.
  • 12. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, Pant AB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicol Int 2012; 19: 225-34.
  • 13. Lee DH, Lim BS, Lee YK, Ahn SJ, Yang HC. Involvement of oxidative stress in mutagenicity and apoptosis caused by dental resin monomers in cell cultures. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1086-92.
  • 14. Krifka S, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. A review of adaptive mechanisms in cell responses towards oxidative stress caused by dental resin monomers. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 4555-63.
  • 15. Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 870-7.
  • 16. Demirci M, Hiller KA, Bosl C, Galler K, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. The induction of oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity by dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 362-71.
  • 17. Katakwar P, Metgud R, Naik S, Mittal R. Oxidative stress marker in oral cancer: A review. J Cancer Res Ther 2016; 12: 438-46.
  • 18. Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Noort RV. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials. Materials 2009; 2: 514-48.
  • 19. Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 203-9.
  • 20. Putnam KP, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ. Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 2002; 16: 599-607.
  • 21. Lonnroth EC, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of liquids and powders of chemically different dental materials evaluated using dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium and neutral red tests. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61: 52-6.
  • 22. Fotakis G, Timbrell JA. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett 2006; 160: 171-7.
  • 23. Cao T, Saw TY, Heng BC, Liu H, Yap AU, Ng ML. Comparison of different test models for the assessment of cytotoxicity of composite resins. J Appl Toxicol 2005; 25: 101-8.
  • 24. Saw TY, Cao T, Yap AU, Lee Ng MM. Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Toxicol In Vitro 2005; 19: 145-54.
  • 25. Ulker HE, Erkan AI, Gunaydin N, Kahvecioglu F, Ulker M. Comparison of the mechanical and biological properties of self-adhering materials. J Adhes Sci Technol 2016; 30: 1119-30.
  • 26. Barbosa MO, de Carvalho RV, Demarco FF, Ogliari FA, Zanchi CH, Piva E, et al. Experimental self-etching HEMA-free adhesive systems: cytotoxicity and degree of conversion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26: 5370.
  • 27. Urcan E, Scherthan H, Styllou M, Haertel U, Hickel R, Reichl FX. Induction of DNA double-strand breaks in primary gingival fibroblasts by exposure to dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2010-4.
  • 28. Engelmann J, Janke V, Volk J, Leyhausen G, von Neuhoff N, Schlegelberger B, et al. Effects of BisGMA on glutathione metabolism and apoptosis in human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4573-80.
  • 29. Krifka S, Seidenader C, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity generated by dental composites in human pulp cells. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 215-24.
  • 30. Pauly K, Fritz K, Furey A, Lobner D. Insulin-like growth factor 1 and transforming growth factor-beta stimulate cystine/glutamate exchange activity in dental pulp cells. J Endod 2011; 37: 943-7.
  • 31. Schweikl H, Hiller KA, Eckhardt A, Bolay C, Spagnuolo G, Stempfl T, et al. Differential gene expression involved in oxidative stress response caused by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1377-87.
  • 32. Gallorini M, Petzel C, Bolay C, Hiller KA, Cataldi A, Buchalla W, et al. Activation of the Nrf2-regulated antioxidant cell response inhibits HEMA-induced oxidative stress and supports cell viability. Biomaterials 2015; 56: 114-28.
  • 33. Chang MC, Chen LI, Chan CP, Lee JJ, Wang TM, Yang TT, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species and hemeoxygenase-1 expression in the cytotoxicity, cell cycle alteration and apoptosis of dental pulp cells induced by BisGMA. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 8164-71.

Oxidative Alteration in Gingival Fibroblast Cells Induced By Bulk-Fill and Conventional Flowable Composites

Year 2018, Volume: 19 Issue: 4, 302 - 309, 31.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.4274/meandros.70299

Abstract

Objective: The release of components from dental materials may cause oxidative stress which is crucial factor for tissue damage and cell apoptosis or death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of different flowable composites and this materials effect on total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total oxidant status (TOS) level in human gingival fibroblast cell culture.
Materials and Methods: Gingival fibroblast cells obtained from healthy persons were used for evaluation the cytotoxicity and oxidant status. Six flowable composites used were: two bulk-fill flowable composites (SureFil SDR, X-tra base), a self-adhering flowable composite (Vertise Flow), a highly filled flowable composite (GrandioSO Flow), two conventional flowable composites (Filtek Ultimate, Clearfil Majesty). Specimens in 3 mm diameter, 2 mm height were prepared from each composite (n=6) and were transferred to 24 well plates. Wells without composite material were used as the control group. After 24 h incubation period, cytotoxicity was determined by using the 3-(4,5 dimetylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenlytetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Oxidative alterations were assessed using TAC and TOS assay kits. Data were analyzed using the ANOVA and least significant differences posthoc test.
Results: Cytotoxicity of six materials was significantly different from the control group (p<0.05). Vertise flow was the most cytotoxic material. TAC levels of Vertise flow were significantly different from X-tra base and GrandioSO. TOS levels increased in SureFil SDR and Vertise flow groups but it was not statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: All of the materials used in this study showed cytotoxic effect in human gingival fibroblast cell culture. These materials did not have a significant effect on TOS level. However, TAC level could not prevent the rise of TOS level in Vertise and sureFil SDR

References

  • 1. Brueckner C, Schneider H, Haak R. Shear Bond Strength and Tooth-Composite Interaction With Self-Adhering Flowable Composites. Oper Dent 2017; 42: 90-100.
  • 2. Sampaio CS, Chiu KJ, Farrokhmanesh E, Janal M, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M, et al. Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation of Polymerization Shrinkage of Class I Flowable Resin Composite Restorations. Oper Dent 2017; 42: E16-E23.
  • 3. Kawai T, Maseki T, Nara Y. Bonding of flowable resin composite restorations to class 1 occlusal cavities with and without cyclic load stress. Dent Mater J 2016; 35: 408-17.
  • 4. Karadas M. The effect of different beverages on the color and translucency of flowable composites. Scanning 2016; 38: 701-9.
  • 5. Tarcin B, Gumru B, Peker S, Ovecoglu HS. Evaluation of Radiopacity of Bulk-fill Flowable Composites Using Digital Radiography. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 424-31.
  • 6. Sumino N, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Shiratsuchi K, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions. Acta Odontol Scand 2013; 71: 820-7.
  • 7. Miletic V, Pongprueksa P, De Munck J, Brooks NR, Van Meerbeek B. Curing characteristics of flowable and sculptable bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21: 1201-12.
  • 8. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 348-55.
  • 9. Moslemi M, Fotouhi Ardakani F, Javadi F, Khalili Sadrabad Z, Shadkar Z, Shadkar MS. Evaluation of Er,Cr\:YSGG Laser Effect on Microshear Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in the Dentin of Permanent Molar: An In Vitro Study. Scientifica (Cairo) 2016; 2016: 4856285.
  • 10. Franz A, Spinell T, Graf A, Wutzel H, Liska R, Watts DC, et al. Cytotoxicity of post and core composites as a function of environmental conditions. Dent Mater 2014; 30: 1179-86.
  • 11. Tadin A, Marovic D, Galic N, Kovacic I, Zeljezic D. Composite-induced toxicity in human gingival and pulp fibroblast cells. Acta Odontol Scand 2014; 72: 304-11.
  • 12. Gupta SK, Saxena P, Pant VA, Pant AB. Release and toxicity of dental resin composite. Toxicol Int 2012; 19: 225-34.
  • 13. Lee DH, Lim BS, Lee YK, Ahn SJ, Yang HC. Involvement of oxidative stress in mutagenicity and apoptosis caused by dental resin monomers in cell cultures. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 1086-92.
  • 14. Krifka S, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. A review of adaptive mechanisms in cell responses towards oxidative stress caused by dental resin monomers. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 4555-63.
  • 15. Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 870-7.
  • 16. Demirci M, Hiller KA, Bosl C, Galler K, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. The induction of oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity by dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 362-71.
  • 17. Katakwar P, Metgud R, Naik S, Mittal R. Oxidative stress marker in oral cancer: A review. J Cancer Res Ther 2016; 12: 438-46.
  • 18. Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Noort RV. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials. Materials 2009; 2: 514-48.
  • 19. Wataha JC. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 203-9.
  • 20. Putnam KP, Bombick DW, Doolittle DJ. Evaluation of eight in vitro assays for assessing the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. Toxicol In Vitro 2002; 16: 599-607.
  • 21. Lonnroth EC, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of liquids and powders of chemically different dental materials evaluated using dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium and neutral red tests. Acta Odontol Scand 2003; 61: 52-6.
  • 22. Fotakis G, Timbrell JA. In vitro cytotoxicity assays: comparison of LDH, neutral red, MTT and protein assay in hepatoma cell lines following exposure to cadmium chloride. Toxicol Lett 2006; 160: 171-7.
  • 23. Cao T, Saw TY, Heng BC, Liu H, Yap AU, Ng ML. Comparison of different test models for the assessment of cytotoxicity of composite resins. J Appl Toxicol 2005; 25: 101-8.
  • 24. Saw TY, Cao T, Yap AU, Lee Ng MM. Tooth slice organ culture and established cell line culture models for cytotoxicity assessment of dental materials. Toxicol In Vitro 2005; 19: 145-54.
  • 25. Ulker HE, Erkan AI, Gunaydin N, Kahvecioglu F, Ulker M. Comparison of the mechanical and biological properties of self-adhering materials. J Adhes Sci Technol 2016; 30: 1119-30.
  • 26. Barbosa MO, de Carvalho RV, Demarco FF, Ogliari FA, Zanchi CH, Piva E, et al. Experimental self-etching HEMA-free adhesive systems: cytotoxicity and degree of conversion. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015; 26: 5370.
  • 27. Urcan E, Scherthan H, Styllou M, Haertel U, Hickel R, Reichl FX. Induction of DNA double-strand breaks in primary gingival fibroblasts by exposure to dental resin composites. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2010-4.
  • 28. Engelmann J, Janke V, Volk J, Leyhausen G, von Neuhoff N, Schlegelberger B, et al. Effects of BisGMA on glutathione metabolism and apoptosis in human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 4573-80.
  • 29. Krifka S, Seidenader C, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. Oxidative stress and cytotoxicity generated by dental composites in human pulp cells. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 16: 215-24.
  • 30. Pauly K, Fritz K, Furey A, Lobner D. Insulin-like growth factor 1 and transforming growth factor-beta stimulate cystine/glutamate exchange activity in dental pulp cells. J Endod 2011; 37: 943-7.
  • 31. Schweikl H, Hiller KA, Eckhardt A, Bolay C, Spagnuolo G, Stempfl T, et al. Differential gene expression involved in oxidative stress response caused by triethylene glycol dimethacrylate. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1377-87.
  • 32. Gallorini M, Petzel C, Bolay C, Hiller KA, Cataldi A, Buchalla W, et al. Activation of the Nrf2-regulated antioxidant cell response inhibits HEMA-induced oxidative stress and supports cell viability. Biomaterials 2015; 56: 114-28.
  • 33. Chang MC, Chen LI, Chan CP, Lee JJ, Wang TM, Yang TT, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species and hemeoxygenase-1 expression in the cytotoxicity, cell cycle alteration and apoptosis of dental pulp cells induced by BisGMA. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 8164-71.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Dentistry (Other), Toxicology
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Neslihan Çelik

Merve İşcan Yapar

Ali Taghizadehghalehjoughi

Publication Date December 31, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 19 Issue: 4

Cite

EndNote Çelik N, İşcan Yapar M, Taghizadehghalehjoughi A (December 1, 2018) Oxidative Alteration in Gingival Fibroblast Cells Induced By Bulk-Fill and Conventional Flowable Composites. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal 19 4 302–309.