Determination of feed value of chemically treated sun-dried grape pomace

Yıl 2024, , 270 - 276, 31.08.2024

Kadir Emre Buğdaycı , Derya Merve Karagöz , Fatma Karakaş Oğuz , Mustafa Numan Oğuz , Esra Çağan Ulusan , Aykut Nacak

https://doi.org/10.24880/meditvetj.1541140

Öz

This study aimed to elucidate the effects of various chemical treatments on the in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and concomitant feed value of dried grape pomace (DGP). Sun-dried grape pomace, derived from grapes processed in Denizli, Türkiye province was used in the experiment. One control group and three treatment groups were established, each with eight replicates. The first, second and third experimental groups were treated with 1.5% ammonia (NH3), 3% urea (CH4N2O) and 3% sodium hydroxide (3%) (NaOH), respectively. The dry matter content was set at 50% for all groups. The control group received no additional chemicals. All groups were kept in airtight, closed plastic bags at room temperature for one week. Adding NH3 and CH4N2O significantly improved crude protein levels (24.45 and 19.84%, respectively) and in vitro protein degradability (59.84 and 65.69%, respectively) in the experimental groups (p<0.001). Treatment with CH4N2O did not exert the same deleterious effect on the ether extract concentration of desiccated grape pomace (p<0.004) as treatment with NaOH. Moreover, relative feed value declined significantly more after NaOH treatment compared to treatments containing nitrogen (p<0.001). Additionally, NaOH treatment yielded the lowest in vitro protein degradability of DGP at 40.32% (p<0.001). With an in vitro dry matter degradability of 47.18%, the findings indicate that among the chemical treatments investigated, application of NH3 resulted in the lowest degradability value (p<0.001). Consequently, it can be inferred that the feed value and digestibility of desiccated grape pomace are highly influenced by the nitrogen concentration or basic nature of the supplemental chemical compounds.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ammonia digestibility, grape pomace, sodium hydroxide, urea

Etik Beyan

The research is not an animal experiment, ethics committee authorisation is not required.

Kaynakça

• Aghsaghali, A. M., Maheri-Sis, N., Mansouri, H., Razeghi, M. E., Telli, A. S., & Golshani, A. A. (2011). Estimation of the nutritive value of grape pomace for ruminants using gas production techniques. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(33), 6246-6250.
• Ahsan, U. (2023). Effect of single or combined homo- and heterofermentative silage additives on the quality, nutritive value, and in vitro digestibility of ensiled wheat harvested at early dough stage of maturity. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Health Sciences Institute, 11(2), 267-274. https://doi.org/10.24998/maeusabed.1345229
• AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
• Atalay, A. I. (2020). Determination of nutritive value and anti-methanogenic potential of Turkish grape pomace using in vitro gas production technique. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 30(4), 944-949. https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2020.4.0110
• Bahrami, Y., Foroozzandeh, A. D., Zamani, F., Modarresi, M., Eghbal-Saeid, S., & Chekani-Azar, S. (2010). Effect of diet with varying levels of dried grape pomace on dry matter digestibility and growth performance of male lamb. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 6(1), 605-610.
• Basalan, M., Güngör, T., Owens, F. N., & Yalçınkaya, I. (2011). Nutrient content and in vitro digestibility of Turkish grape pomaces. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 169, 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.07.005.
• Baumgartel, T., Kluth, H., Epperlein, K., & Rodehutscord,M. (2007). A note on digestibility and energy value for sheep of different grape pomace. Small Ruminant Research, 67, 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.11.002.
• Besharati, M., & Taghizade, A. (2010). Effect of adding polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone on organic matter digestibility, metaboliz.able energy and net energy for lactation of grape pomace using in vitro gas production technique. Proceeding of the British Society of Animal Science, 1(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470010003948
• Çakmakçı, S., & Barut, N. (1997). The methods of increasing nutritional value and digestibility of low quality forages. Akdeniz University Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 10, 345-357.
• Dawson, B., & Trapp, R.G. (2001). Basic and clinical biostatistics, 3rd ed. Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill Medical Publishing Division, New York, 994, 180.
• Deng, Q., Penner, M. H., & Zhao, Y. (2011). Chemical composition of dietary fiber and polyphenols of five different varieties of wine grape pomace skins. Food Research International, 44(9), 2712-2720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.05.026
• EC (2003). Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition. Official Journal L 268:29, 2003. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2003/1831/oj
• EC (2012). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 839/2012 of September 2012 concerning the authorisation of urea as feed additive for ruminants. Official Journal of the European Union L252:11, 2012. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex-UriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:252:0011:0013:EN:PDF
• Faostat (2023). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare) Erişim: 29.09.2023.
• Hanusovsky, O., Galik, B., Biro, D., Simko, M., Juracek, M., Rolinec, M., Zabransky, L., Philipp, C., Puntigam, R., Slama, J. A., & Gierus, M. (2020) The nutritional potential of grape by-products from the area of Slovakia and Austria. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 32(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i1.2051
• Horrocks, V., Valentine, J. F. (1999). Harvested forages. Academic Press.
• Kılıç, U., & Abdiwali, A. A. (2016). Determination of in vitro true digestibilities and relative feed values of wine industry grape residues as alternative feed source. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 22(6), 895- 901. https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2016.15617
• Linn J. G., Martin N. P. (2024, April 8). Forage Quality Tests and Interpretations. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/207442/MN2500_AGFO_2637_revised1989.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Maduro Dias, C. S. A. M., Madruga, J. S., Vouzela, C. F. M., Borba, A. E. S. (2021). Effect of sodium hydroxide treatment in ginger lily forage (Hedychium gardnerianum, Sheppard ex Ker-Gawl) as forage for animal feeding. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(2), 268-272. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2020.15332.
• Martens, S. D., Wildner, V., Schulze, J., Richardt, W., Greef, J. M., Zeyner, A., & Steinhöfel, O. (2022). Chemical treatment of straw for ruminant feeding with NaOH or urea – investigative steps via practical application under current European Union conditions. Agricultural and Food Science, 31, 260–281. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.115262
• Nerantzis, E. T., & Tataridis, P. (2006). Integrated enology utilization of winery by products into high added value products. Journal of Science and Technology, 1(3), 79-89.
• Özcan, M. M., Al Juhaimi, F., Gülcü, M., Uslu, N. & Geçgel, Ü. (2017). Determination of bioactive compounds and mineral contents of seedless parts and seeds of grapes. South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 38(2), 212-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.21548/38-2-1605
• Özdüven, M. L., Coşkuntuna, L. & Koç, F. (2005). Determination of fermentation and feed value characteristics of grape pomace silage. Trakya University Journal of Natural Sciences, 6(1), 45-50.
• Pop, I. M., Pascariu, S. M., Simeanu, D., Radu-Rusu, C., & Albu, A. (2015). Determination of the chemical composition of the grape pomace of different varieties of grapes. University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Iasi. Scientific Papers-Animal Science Series: Lucrări Ştiinţifice - Seria Zootehnie, 63, 76-80.
• Rezaii, F., Bayatkouhsar, J., Ghanbari, F., & Arab, F. (2023). The effect of water, urea, sodium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide processing on the cumin residues animal digestibility. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture, 12(4), 525- 537. https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2022.1953020.1418
• Sarıçiçek, B. Z., & Kılıç, Ü. (2002). A study on determining in situ degradability of grape pomace. Atatürk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty, 33(3), 289-292.
• Sümbül, A., & Yıldız, E. (2022). Present situation and production projection of table, dry and wine grapes grown in Turkey. Erciyes Agriculture and Animal Science, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.55257/ethabd.1095080
• Teixeira, S. M. P., Maduro Dias, C. S. A. M., Vouzela, C. F. M., Madruga, J. S., & Borba, A. E. S. (2021). Nutritional valorisation of cane (Arundo donax) by treatment with sodium hydroxide. South African Journal of Animal Science, 51 (4), 437-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v51i4.3
• TÜİK, (2023) İstatistik veri portalı. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Search/Search?text=%C3%BCz%C3%BCm Erişim: 29.09.2023
• Uzatıcı, A., Canbolat, O., & Kamalak, A. (2022). Effect ofsodium hydroxide treatment on chemical composition and feed value of common reed (phragmites australis) straw. Fermentation. 8, 749, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation8120749
• Varış, S., Altıntaş, S., & Butt, S.J. (2000). Cibre ve cibre torba kültürü. Hasad Dergisi, 186, 40-43.
• Voicu, D., Habeanu, M., Uta, R. A., Voicu, I., & Gras, M. A. (2014). Effect of the dietary dry grape pomace on the performance and health state of fattening steers. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, 57, 118-124.
• Winkler, A., Weber, F., Robert, R., & Dusel, G. (2015). Determination of polyphenol and crude nutrient content and nutrient digestibility of dried and ensiled white and red grape pomace cultivars. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 69:3, 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1039751
• Zhen-Zhen, L., Chen, Z., Fa-Di, L., Chong, L., De-Fu, T., Xiu-Xiu, W., Ting, L., Zhi-Yuan, M., & Dong-Fang, M. A. (2015). Effect of feeding grape pomace on nutrients digestibility, body weight gain, and carcass quality in lambs. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 24 (4), 114-120.