Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 603 - 7, 18.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1318386

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Akkoç RF, Aksu F, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M. Anatomy education from the perspective of clinician: questionnaire study. Firat Med J. 2021;26:234-8.
  • 2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110-4.
  • 3. Karabilgin ÖS, Şahin H. Student ratings in evaluation of teaching effectiveness and educational program. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;21:27-33.
  • 4. Ari I, İrgil E, Kafa İM, Şendemir E. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student's views. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:15-8.
  • 5. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Attitudes of pre-clinical and clinical stage medical school students toward using cadaver in anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26:227-32.
  • 6. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, Aktaş S, Oğuz Ö. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
  • 7. Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Evaluation of anatomy education by students in Akdeniz University school of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008;28:31-6.
  • 8. Acuner AM, Yalçın M, Ersoy M, et al. Ankara üniversitesi tıp fakültesi anatomi dersine ilişkin öğretme-öğrenme sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. 1999;52:211-8.
  • 9. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı ile hazırlanan anatomi dersinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 2014;4:48-62.
  • 10. Ulucam E, Gokce N, Mesut R. Turkish anatomy education from the foundation of the first modern medical school to today. JISHIM. 2003;2:50-2.
  • 11. Kulik JA. Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002:2001:9-25.
  • 12. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2022;21:118-27.
  • 13. Telli SG, Altun D. The indispensability of online learning after earthquake in Turkiye. Journal of University Research. 2023;6:125-36.
  • 14. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, et al. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:515-21.
  • 15. Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, et al. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020;19:100065.
  • 16. Turhan B, Yakut Y. The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatomy. 2020;14:134-8.
  • 17. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. 2017;13:29:33.

Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 603 - 7, 18.09.2023
https://doi.org/10.37990/medr.1318386

Öz

Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the opinions of first-year dentistry students who switched to online education after the Kahramanmaraş earthquake on anatomy education.
Material and Methods: A total of 82 students, 38 males and 44 females, participated in the study. The questionnaire consisting of 14 questions was applied online. The questionnaire was Likert-type and calculated as flat coded questions (completely disagree 1 point, disagree 2 points, no idea 3 points, agree 4 points, completely agree 5 points). The questions were calculated as reverse coded because they expressed negativity. There were 13 questions in the questionnaire, except for the open-ended and gender-reporting question, and the highest score was 65 and the lowest score was 13.
Results: The expected frequency of completely agree is 15.3 (40.2%), while the observed frequency is 21 (55.3%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05). In the question "I participated in anatomy courses taught online", the expected frequency of completely agree was 1 (2.3%) while the observed frequency was 0 (0%). Statistically, there is a difference between expected and observed values (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Since the anatomy course has too many subjects, the subject contents are difficult to learn, and it is also a basic course, it is important to conduct theoretical and practical lessons face-to-face instead of online.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Akkoç RF, Aksu F, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M. Anatomy education from the perspective of clinician: questionnaire study. Firat Med J. 2021;26:234-8.
  • 2. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110-4.
  • 3. Karabilgin ÖS, Şahin H. Student ratings in evaluation of teaching effectiveness and educational program. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2006;21:27-33.
  • 4. Ari I, İrgil E, Kafa İM, Şendemir E. A questionnaire study: anatomy education and student's views. Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2003;29:15-8.
  • 5. Yavuz F, Ertekin T, Elmalı F, Ülger H. Attitudes of pre-clinical and clinical stage medical school students toward using cadaver in anatomy education. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2017;26:227-32.
  • 6. Uygur R, Çağlar V, Topçu B, Aktaş S, Oğuz Ö. The assessment of the students’ opinions about anatomy education. Int J Basic Clin Med. 2013;1:94-106.
  • 7. Sindel M, Şenol Y, Gürpınar E. Evaluation of anatomy education by students in Akdeniz University school of medicine. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2008;28:31-6.
  • 8. Acuner AM, Yalçın M, Ersoy M, et al. Ankara üniversitesi tıp fakültesi anatomi dersine ilişkin öğretme-öğrenme sürecinin değerlendirilmesi. 1999;52:211-8.
  • 9. Topal AD, Ocak MA. Harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamı ile hazırlanan anatomi dersinin öğrencilerin akademik başarıları üzerindeki etkisi. Educational Technology Theory and Practice. 2014;4:48-62.
  • 10. Ulucam E, Gokce N, Mesut R. Turkish anatomy education from the foundation of the first modern medical school to today. JISHIM. 2003;2:50-2.
  • 11. Kulik JA. Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2002:2001:9-25.
  • 12. Çan MA. Metaphors for anatomy lesson of students who received anatomy education in faculty of medicine and faculty of dentistry. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası. 2022;21:118-27.
  • 13. Telli SG, Altun D. The indispensability of online learning after earthquake in Turkiye. Journal of University Research. 2023;6:125-36.
  • 14. Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P, et al. Anatomy education of medical and dental students during COVID-19 pandemic: a reality check. Surg Radiol Anat. 2021;43:515-21.
  • 15. Kelsey AH, McCulloch V, Gillingwater TH, et al. Anatomical sciences at the University of Edinburgh: initial experiences of teaching anatomy online. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020;19:100065.
  • 16. Turhan B, Yakut Y. The opinions of physiotherapy students on online anatomy education during COVID-19 pandemic. Anatomy. 2020;14:134-8.
  • 17. Pamay A, Büyükertan M, Balcıoğlu HA. An investigation on the anatomy education at dental faculties in European and North American universities. 2017;13:29:33.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Anatomi
Bölüm Özgün Makaleler
Yazarlar

Adem Tokpınar 0000-0001-7661-9588

Selen Yılmaz 0000-0002-5637-2642

Halil Yılmaz 0000-0002-8234-4901

Muhammet Değermenci 0000-0002-4751-6202

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 23 Ağustos 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Eylül 2023
Kabul Tarihi 23 Temmuz 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

AMA Tokpınar A, Yılmaz S, Yılmaz H, Değermenci M. Investigation of the Opinions of the First-Year Students of Dentistry Who Go to Online Education on Anatomy Education After the Kahramanmaraş Earthquake. Med Records. Eylül 2023;5(3):603-7. doi:10.37990/medr.1318386

         

Chief Editors
Assoc. Prof. Zülal Öner
Address: İzmir Bakırçay University, Department of Anatomy, İzmir, Turkey

Assoc. Prof. Deniz Şenol
Address: Düzce University, Department of Anatomy, Düzce, Turkey

E-mail: medrecsjournal@gmail.com

Publisher:
Medical Records Association (Tıbbi Kayıtlar Derneği)
Address: Düzce / Türkiye


Publication Support: 

Effect Publishing & Agency
Phone: + 90 (553) 610 67 80
E-mail: info@effectpublishing.com