Comparison of documentation cultural artifacts using the 3D model in different software

Abstract

The creation and drawing of a three-dimensional (3D) model of historical and cultural buildings have become an important issue. Especially in terms of protecting these historical buildings and transferring future generations, their importance is gradually increasing. Close-range photogrammetry is a method used for many years. With the development of computer and information technology, the classical close-range photogrammetry method has been replaced by the digital close-range photogrammetry method. Digital photogrammetry methods are easier to perform with a computer than conventional methods. By close-range photogrammetry method; it can offer many products such as orthophoto, 3D model, drawing, digital surface, and terrain. In this study, photogrammetric research was carried out for documentation purposes in Cimcime Hatun Tomb in Erzurum. In the study, the hybrid method was applied by taking photos from the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) and ground. The 3D model study was carried out in 3 different software (Agisoft PhotoScan, Context Capture, Photomodeler UAS). At the end of the study, the advantages and disadvantages of this software have been discussed. As a result of the study, the position accuracy (X, Y, Z) of Agisoft Photoscan, Context Capture, and Photomodeler UAS software was calculated as 2.17, 2.73, 1.73 cm.

Keywords

• Close-range Photogrammetry
• Documentation
• UAV
• 3D model
• Different Software

References

1. GRUSSENMEYER, P., LANDES, T., VOEGTLE, T. & RİNGLE K. (2008). Comparison Methods of Terrestrial Laser Scanning, Photogrammetry and Tacheometry Data for Recording of Cultural Heritage Buildings. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37.
2. McCARTHY, J. (2014). Multi-image Photogrammetry as a Practical Tool for Cultural Heritage Survey and Community Engagement. Journal of Archaeological Science, 43, 175-185.
3. ŞASİ, A., & YAKAR, M. (2017). Photogrammetric Modelling of Hasbey Dar'ülhuffaz (Masjid) Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(1), 6–11.
4. ULVİ, A. (2008). Antik Tiyatroların Fotogrametrik Rölöve Planlarının Çıkarılması Üzerine Deneysel Bir Çalışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Fotogrametri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 2008.
5. ULVİ, A., & TOPRAK, A.S. (2016). Investigation of Three-Dimensional Modelling Availability Taken Photograph of the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle; Sample of Kanlıdivane Church. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 1(1), 1–7.
6. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. & Kaya, Y. (2019). The Use of Photogrammetric Techniques in Documenting Cultural Heritage: The Example of Aksaray Selime Sultan Tomb. Universal Journal Of Engineering Science, 7(3), 64-73.
7. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., YİĞİT, A. Y., & Kaya, Y. (2020). İHA ve Yersel Fotogrametrik Teknikler Kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilise’nin 3 Boyutlu Nokta Bulutu ve Modelinin Üretilmesi. Geomatik Dergisi, 5(1), 22-30.
8. USLU, A., & UYSAL, M. (2017). Arkeolojik Eserlerin Fotogrametri Yöntemi ile 3 Boyutlu Modellenmesi: Demeter Heykeli Örneği. Geomatik Dergisi, 2 (2), 60-65.

9. USLU, A., POLAT, N., TOPRAK, A.S., & UYSAL, M. (2016). Kültürel Mirasın Fotogrametrik Yöntemle 3B Modellenmesi Örneği. Electronic Journal of Map Technologies, 8(2), 165-176.
10. WOLF, P. R. (1974), Elements of Photogrammetry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Yakar, M., Kabadayı, A., Yiğit, A. Y., Çıkıkcı, K., Kaya, Y. & Catin, S. S. (2016). Emir Saltuk Kümbeti Fotogrametrik Rölöve Çalişmasi ve 3Boyutlu Modellenmesi. Geomatik Dergisi, 1(1), 14-18.
12. Yakar, M., Orhan, O., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y. & Yüzer, M. M. (2015). Sahip Ata Külliyesi Rölöve Örneği. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 10.
13. ZEYBEK, M. & KAYA, A. (2020). Tarihi Yığma Kiliselerde Hasarların Fotogrametrik Ölçme Tekniğiyle İncelenmesi: Artvin Tbeti Kilisesi Örneği. Geomatik, 5 (1), 47-57.
14. URL-1. https://www.digicamdb.com/specs/nikon_d3100/ Retrieved: 08.04.2020
15. URL-2. https://www.dji.com/phantom-3-pro/info Retrieved: 08.04.2020
16. URL-3. https://archnet.org/sites/18000 Retrieved: 31.05.2020