LITERATURE REVIEW ON SUSTAINABILITY IN MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION

Year 2019, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 40 - 47, 25.12.2019

Nergis Özispa , Durmuş Ali Deveci

Abstract

There has been significant
growth in research on sustainability issues and intermodal transport in freight
distribution since the 1990s. However, when it comes to sustainability
literature in multimodal transport it seems that there are very few
publications. The aim of the study is to analyze the studies that examine
sustainability in multimodal transport, which is the most sustainable
transportation system. Therefore, the three key phrases, “multimodal transport
sustainability”, “intermodal transport sustainability”, and “combined transport
sustainability” have been scanned in seven separate databases and the studies
obtained have been analyzed by content analysis method. The analysis reveals
that railway transportation has prominently been used in the intermodal combinations,
which seems to have contributed to gaining sustainability. It is also observed
through the analysis that most of the studies have used case study method to
analyze the sustainability of multimodal transport activities. Still another
point revealed is that the social dimension of sustainability seems to have
scarcely been analyzed in the sustainable intermodal transportation literature.

Keywords

Multimodal Transportation, Sustainability, Content Analysis

References

• Aksoy, Ç. (2013). Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Ölçek Önerisi ve Türkiye’deki İşletmelerde Uygulaması. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). İstanbul: Marmara University Institute of Social Sciences.
• Babbie, E. R. (1992). The practice of social research, Wadsworth Pub. Co., CA.
• Behrends, S. (2012). The significance of the urban context for the sustainability performance of intermodal road-rail transport. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 54, 375-386.
• Bonabeau, E. (2002). Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(suppl 3), 7280-7287.
• Broesterhuizen, E. F. M., Vellinga, T., Docters van Leeuwen, L., Zwakhals, J. W., Taneja, P., and Nijdam, M. (2012). Sustainability as a Procurement Criterion for Port Investments. CESUN2012, Delft.
• Budgen,D., Charters, S., Turner, M.,, Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Linkman, S. (2006) Investigating the applicability of the evidence-based paradigm to software engineering, Proc. 2006 Int’l Workshop on interdisciplinary software engineering research, pp. 7 – 13.
• Dias, J. G. (2017). Environmental Sustainability Measurement in the Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index: An Empirical Analysis of its Reliability. Ecological Indicators, 73, 589-596.
• Eş, A. (2008). Sürdürülebilirlik ve Firma Düzeyinde Sürdürülebilirlik Performans Ölçümü. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal University Institute of Social Sciences.
• European Commission, (2001). White Paper European Transport Policy for 2010: time to decide. Commission of the European Communities.
• Frayret, J. M. (2012). Multi-Agent System applications in the forest products industry. Journal of Science & Technology for Forest Products and Processes.
• Furtado, P., & Frayret, J. M. (2015). Proposal Sustainability Assessment of Resource Sharing in Intermodal Freight Transport with Agent-based Simulation. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 436-441.
• Grassel, E. and Schirmer, B., (2006). The use of volunteers to support family careers of dementia patients: results of a prospective longitudinal study investigating expectations towards and experience with training and professional support. Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie 39 (3): 217-226 Jun.
• GRI, (2013). Global Reporting Initiative, G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Implementation Manual. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Gulsecen, S. and Kubat, A., (2006). Teaching ICT to teacher candidates using PBL: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (2): 96-106.
• Hakam, M. H. and Solvang, W. D. (2013). Container Ports Sustainability: A Literature Review. In Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on (pp. 803-810). IEEE. December 2013.
• Heinberg, R. and Lerch, D. (2010). The Post Carbon Reader: Managing the 21st Century's Sustainability Crises. Watershed Media.
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
• Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities.
• Johnson, M.P., (2006). Decision models for the location of community corrections centers. Environment And Planning B-Planning & Design 33 (3): 393-412 May.
• Kaid, L. L., & Wadsworth, A. J. (1989). Content analysis. Measurement of communication behavior, 197-217.
• Kitchenham, B., Mendes, E., Travassos, G.H. (2007) A Systematic Review of Cross- vs. Within-Company Cost Estimation Studies, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33 (5), pp 316-329.
• Kolak, O. İ. (2015). Design and Assessment of Transportation Systems with the Sustainability Perspective. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). İstanbul: Galatasaray University Institute of Sciences and Engineering.
• Kuhlman, T., and Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448.
• Kuş, H. D. (2012). Sustainable Supply Chain Management Application to Turkish Construction Industry. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). İstanbul: Fatih University Institute of Sciences and Engineering.
• Lane, D. (1993), Artificial worlds and economics, part I, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3, 89-107.
• Litman, T. (2011). Well Measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
• Lubin, D. A., & Esty, D. C. (2010). The sustainability imperative. Harvard Business Review, 88 (5), 42–50. doi:10.1057/9780230115439
• Macharis, C., Van Mierlo, J., & Van Den Bossche, P. (2007). Combining intermodal transport with electric vehicles: Towards more sustainable solutions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(2-3), 311-323.
• Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Handbuch qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, 601-613.
• McDonagh, P. and Prothero, A. (2014). Sustainability marketing research: past, present and future. Journal of Marketing Management, 30 (11-12), p.1186-1219. doi: /10.1080/0267257X.2014.943263
• Nazlı, M. (2016). Does Sustainability Matter? A Qualitative Study in Tourism Industry in Turkey. Journal of Yaşar University, 11(44), 339-350.
• Olafsson, S., Cook, D., Davidsdottir, B. and Johannsdottir, L. (2014). Measuring Countries ׳ Environmental Sustainability Performance: A Review and Case Study of Iceland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 934-948.
• Omann, I. and Spangenberg, J. H. (2002). Assessing Social Sustainability. In Biennial Conference of the International Society for Ecological Economics (Vol. 7). March 2002.
• Özdemir, M. (2010). NİTEL VERİ ANALİZİ: SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE YÖNTEMBİLİM SORUNSALI ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA. Eski § ehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
• Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide: Blackwell Publishing.
• Rosengren, K. E. (Ed.). (1981). Advances in content analysis (Vol. 9). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
• Shuttleworth, Martyn (2009). What Is A Literature Review?. Retrieved 23.12.2017 from Experiment Resources: http://www.experimentresources. com/what-is-a-literature-review.html
• SIR-C, (2011). The Heuristics Intermodal Transport Model Calculation System. School of Business, Economics and Law. Swedish International Transport Research Centre.
• Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: SAGE Publication.
• Sislian, L., Jaegler, A. and Cariou, P. (2016). A Literature Review on Port Sustainability and Ocean's Carrier Network Problem. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 19, 19-26.
• Tanzil, D. and Beloff, B. R. (2006). Assessing Impacts: Overview on Sustainability Indicators and Metrics. Environmental Quality Management, 15(4), 41-56.
• Tellis, Winston, (1997). Introduction to Case Study. The Qualitative Report, Volume 3, Number 2, July. (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html).
• Tesfatsion, L. (2001), Agent-based modelling of evolutionary economic systems, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 5, 1-6.
• Torjman, S. (2000). The social dimension of sustainable development (pp. 1-11). Toronto: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
• Ugbaja, S.C. (2016). Sustainability Practices in the Top Universities of the UI Greenmetric Sustainable Ranking Index. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). İstanbul: Okan University Institute of Social Sciences.
• Yin, R.K., (1984). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage Publications.
• Walcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis and Interpretation. London: SAGE Publications.
• WCED, U. (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development Oxford University Press.