ANALYZING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FACTORS OF LOGISTICS SERVICE PROVIDERS: A CASE STUDY OF IZMIR REGION

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 62 - 76, 31.12.2020

Gökçe Tuğdemir Kök , İlke Sezin Ayaz , Esra Baran Kasapoğlu

https://doi.org/10.47512/meujmaf.808323

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Competition starts with existence of life itself. In order to survive in the globalizing world, it is a great necessity for companies to provide sustainable competitive advantage. In this sense, in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage, factors affecting competition should be deeply perceived and implemented. In recent years, logistics sector has had a complex structure as global competition has been increasing and logistics capabilities are getting more and more critical for the success of logistics service providers. For this reason, it is aimed to determine the attitudes of senior managers who are working in the logistics service provider companies in Izmir towards the factors affecting competition. For this purpose, Delphi method, which is a qualitative research method, has been applied in this research. In the first round of Delphi research, 29 factors affecting competition obtained from the literature review have been asked to experts under six groups and a consensus has been tried to be reached. As a result of the first round, for 6 factors a consensus could not be reached, and then the statements have been re-evaluated and detailed, and another Delphi form for second round has been prepared and implemented. According to the findings, t the valuable, sense of market opportunities and sensitivity to the market, the ability to integrate employees' knowledge and skills with the routines of their operations, after-sales service and reliability which are the factors affecting competition for logistics service providers have been fully agreed upon by logistics service providers. All factors related to dynamic capabilities approach associated with competition in the literature have been considered important by logistics service providers. There has no consensus on the factors related to threats / barriers faced by new entrants in the logistics sector and bargaining power of service buyers.

Keywords

Competition, Logistics Service Provider, Delphi, Competitive advantage

References

• Aktan, C. C. (2008). “Stratejik yönetim ve stratejik planlama.” Çimento İşveren Dergisi, Vol. 4, No. 22, pp. 4-21.
• Asunakutlu, T. (2002). “Örgütsel güvenin oluşturulmasına ilişkin unsurlar ve bir değerlendirme.” Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, No. 9, pp. 1-13.
• Ayaz, İ.S. and Çetin, İ.B. (2018). “Analyzing the attitudes of turkish shipowning companies towards green shipping application aiming sustainable transportation.” Journal of Business Researh-Turk, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 229-245.
• Babacan, M. (2003). “Lojistik sektörünün ülkemizdeki gelişimi ve rekabet vizyonu.” Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Vol. 3, No.1, pp. 8-15.
• Bahar, O. and Kozak, M. (2012). Turizm ve rekabet, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, Turkey.
• Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.
• Barney J. (1995). “Looking ınside for competitive advantage.” Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 49-61.
• Barney, J. B. (1996). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, Addison Wesley Publishing Company Reading, Massachusetts, USA.
• Barutçugil, İ. (2013). Stratejik Yönetim, Kariyer Yayıncılık, İstanbul, TURKEY.
• Bhatnagar, R. and Teo, C. C. (2009). “Role of logistics in enhancing competitive advantage: A value chain framework for global supply chains.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 202-226.
• Bhuyan, J. and Padhy, P. K. (2015). “Key success factors of achieving sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical study.” SPC ERA IJBM, Vol.3, No.7, pp.41-53.
• Brett, V. and Roe, M. (2010). “The potential for the clustering of the maritime transport sector in the greater dublin region.” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 37, No.1, pp. 1-16.
• Chen, Z. and Pak, M. (2017). “A delphi analysis on green performance evaluation indices for ports in china.” Maritime Policy & Management, Vol.44, No.5, pp.537-550.
• Clayton, M. J. (1997). “Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education.” Educational Psychology, Vol.17, No.4, pp. 373-386.
• Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. and White, R. E. (1999). “An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution.” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24, No.3, pp. 522-537.
• Çekerol, G. S. and Kurnaz, N. (2011). “Küresel kriz ekseninde lojistik sektörü ve rekabet analizi.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, No. 25, pp. 47-59.
• Dalkey, N. and Helmer, O. (1963). “An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts.” Management Science, Vol. 9. No. 3, pp. 458-467.
• Deveci ve Çetin (2013). “Gemi acenteleri ve forvarder işletmeleri: işlevler ve hizmetler.” Denizcilik İşletmeleri Yönetimi A. Güldem Cerit, D. Ali Deveci and Soner Esmer, Eds., Beta Yayıncılık, İstanbul, pp. 471-501.
• Dikyol, S. (2007). The analysis of Michael Porter's competition strategy factor's in civil aviation sector: comparison of atlasjet and pegasus airlines, Master Thesis, Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Donohoe, H. M. and Needham, R. D. (2009). “Moving best practice forward: Delphi characteristics, advantages, potential problems, and solutions”. International Journal of Tourism Research, 11(5), 415–437.
• Emiroğlu, Ç. and Çaylan, D. Ö. (2014). “The ımportance of strategic leadership for port management: A delphi research on top managers of Turkish private ports.” Journal of Global Strategic Management, Vol. 8, No.2, pp. 5-16.
• Founou, R. (2002). “The role of IT in logistics competitive advantage or strategic necessity.” Proc., 2nd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Switzerland, pp. 1-21.
• Franklin, K.K. and Hart, J.K. (2007). “Idea Generation and Exploration: Benefits and Limitations of the Policy Delphi Research Method”, Innovative Higher Education, 31(4): 237–246.
• Gál, A. N. (2010). “Competitiveness of small and medium sized enterprises-a possible analytical framework.” Hungarian Electronic Journal of Science, pp. 1-14.
• Ghemawat, P. (2002). “Competition and Business Strategy In Historical Perspective.” Business History Review, Vol. 76, No.1, Pp. 37-74.
• Gomez Paz, M. A., Camarero Orive, A. and González Cancelas, N. (2015). “Use of the Delphi method to determine the constraints that affect the future size of large container ships.” Maritime Policy & Management, Vol.42, No.3, pp. 263-277.
• Gonzalez, M. E., Quesada, G., Mueller, R. and Mora-Monge, C. A. (2004). “QFD strategy house: an innovative tool for linking marketing and manufacturing strategies.” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22, No.3, pp. 335-348.
• Gordon, T. J. (1994). The Delphi method. Futures Research Methodology, AC/UNU Millenium Project, http://www.gerenciamento.ufba.br/downloads/delphi_method.pdf [Accessed 08 Oct 2020].
• Grant, R. M. (1991). “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy.” California Management Review, Vol. 3, No.33, pp. 114-135.
• Gülmez, S. and Çetin, Ç. K. (2016). “An ownershıp and management model proposal for logıstıcs centers ın Turkey.” Proc., The Second Global Conference on Innovation in Marine Technology and the Future of Maritime Transportation, Bodrum, Muğla, TURKEY, pp. 543-559.
• Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C.K. (1994). Competing for the future, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts, USA.
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S. vand Mckenna, H. (2000). “Research guidelines for delphi survey technique.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 32, No.4, pp. 1008-1015
• Helfat, C. E. and Peteraf, M. A. (2003). “The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, pp.997-1010.
• Henderson, B. D. (1983). “The anatomy of competition.” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 47, No.2, pp. 7-11.
• Henderson, B. D. (1989). “The origin of strategy.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 139-143.
• Hise, R. T. (1995). “The implications of time-based competition on international logistics strategies.” Business Horizons, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 39-46.
• Kain, P. and Sharma, S. (2014). “Business ethics as competitive advantage for companies in the globalized era.” Journal of Management Sciences and Technology, Vol.3, No. 1, pp. 39-46.
• Karamustafa, K., Güllü, K., Acar, N. ve Ulama, Ş. (2010). Konaklama İşletmelerinde Pazar Odaklılık, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, Turkey.
• Kırım, A. (2004). Yeni Dünyada Strateji ve Yönetim, Sistem Yayıncılık, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Kocaoğlu, İ. U. (2013). Firma rekabet gücünü artıran faktörler ve kümelenme yaklaşımı: Türkiye doğal taş kümelenmelerinin rekabet gücü açısından incelenmesi, PhD Thesis, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
• Kohli, A. K. and Jaworski, B.J. (1990). “Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial ımplications.” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No.2, pp.1-18.
• Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management, The Millennium Edition, Person Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
• Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2004). Principles of marketing, 10th Edition, Pearson-Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
• Kramer, A. and Kramer, J. (2010). Flexibility of delivery frequency in logistic competition. Working paper, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
• Lee, E. S., and Song, D. W. (2015). “Competition and co-operation in maritime logistics operations.” Handbook of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, Springer, Cham, pp. 477-496.
• Linstone, H. A. and Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method techniques and applications, Addison-Wesley, London, UK.
• Lu, H. A., Cheng, J. and Lee, T. S. (2006). “An evaluation of strategic alliances in liner shipping-an empirical study of CKYH.” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 202-212.
• Lopez, S. V. (2005). “Competitive advantage and strategy formulation: The key role of dynamic capabilities.” Management Decision, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 661–669.
• Mentzer, J. T., Min, S., and Michelle Bobbitt, L. (2004). “Toward a unified theory of logistics.” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 606-627.
• Michalisin, M.D., Smith, R.D. and Kline, D.M. (1997). “In search of strategic assets.” The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 5. No. 4, pp. 360-387.
• Paché, G., and Medina, P. (2007). “The entrenchment strategy of logistics service providers: Towards a sequential cooperation-competition process?” Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 65-78.
• Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York, USA.
• Porter, M. E. (2000). Competitive strategy: techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York, USA.
• Porter, M.E. (2008). “The five competitive forces that shape strategy.” Harvard Business Review, No.86, No. 1, pp. 78-93.
• Proctor, T. (2000). Strategic marketing: An introduction, Routledge, London, UK.
• Raisinghani, M.S. (2000). “Adapting data modeling techniques for data warehouse design.” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 73-77.
• Rayens, M. K. and Hahn, E. J. (2000). “Building consensus using the policy delphi method.” Policy, Politics and Nursing Practice, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 308-315
• Saldanha, J. and Gray, R. (2002). “The potential for british coastal shipping in a multimodal chain.” Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 77-92.
• Sandberg, E., and Abrahamsson, M. (2011). “Logistics capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage.” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 61-75.
• Stanford, B. A. and Hsu, C. C. (2007). “The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 12, No. 10, pp. 1-8.
• Stalk, G. (1988). “Time-the next source of competitive advantage.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66, No. 4, pp. 41-51.
• Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N. and Rook, D.W. (2007). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice, Applied Social Research Methods Series, 20, ABD: Sage Publications.
• Stitt-Gohdes, W. L. and Crews, T. B. (2004). “Delphi technique: A research strategy for career and technical education.” Journal of Career and Technical Education, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 55-67.
• Tanış, F. (2020). Üniversite - Sanayi İşbirliği. http://www.emo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=46183&tipi=21&sube=0 [Accessed 22 June 2020].
• Teece, D. J. (1982). “Towards an economic theory of the multi-product firm.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 39-63.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509-533.
• Turoff, M. and Hiltz, S. R. (2001). Computer Based Delphi Processes. Gazing into the Oracle The Delphi Method and its Application to Social Policy and Public Health. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Türkmen, İ. and Yilmaz, H. (2019). “Stratejik girişimcilik ve bilgi yönetimi performansı arasındaki ilişki: Bilişim 500 şirketlerinde bir araştırma.” Journal of Yaşar University, Vol. 14, No. 53, pp.1-12.
• Ülgen, H. and Mirze, S. K. (2013). İşletmelerde Stratejik Yönetim (8. Baskı), Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul, Türkiye.
• Vinayani G., Jayashree, S. and Marthandan, G. (2012). “Critical success factors of sustainable competitive advantage: A study in Malaysian manufacturing industries.” International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 7, No. 22, pp. 29-45.
• Wanjiku, W. A. (2012). Factors influencing competitive advantage of firms in the micro finance industry in Kenya, Master thesis, Business University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
• Wattanapruttipaisan, T. (2002). “SME subcontracting as a bridgehead to competitiveness: An assessment of supply-side capabilities and demand-side requirements.” Asia-Pacific Development Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 65-87.
• Wen, C. H., Tsai, M. C. and Lin, C. H. (2011). “Classification and competition analysis of air cargo logistics providers: The case of Taiwan’s high-technology industry.” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 106-109.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A resource‐based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171-180.
• World Economic Forum (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report (2016-2017), Geneva, Switzerland
• Yalçin, A. and Ene, S. (2013). “Online Ortamda Kurumsal Marka Imajinin Marka Sadakati Ile Ilişkisi Üzerine Bir Araştirma.” Marmara Üniversitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Dergisi, Vol. 34, No. 1, Pp. 113-134.
• Yılmaz V. (2014). Konaklama işletmelerinin rekabet gücünü belirleyen faktörler üzerine Nevşehir ilinde bir uygulama, Master Thesis, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş University, Nevşehir, Turkey.
• Ziglio, E. (1996). “The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making.” Gazing Into the Oracle: The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, Ziglio, E. and Adler, M. Eds., Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp.3-29.