Avrupa’nın Göç İkilemi- Düzensiz Göçün Sosyal ve Siyasi Etkileri

Öz

Düzensiz göç, Avrupa Birliği için sosyal, ekonomik ve siyasi etkileri olan sorunlardan biri haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışma, düzensiz göçün nedenlerini, onu tanımlamadaki zorlukları ve ulusal egemenlik ile toplumsal uyum açısından algılanan tehditleri ele almaktadır. Çalışmada, göç politikaları, insan hakları unsurları ve üye devletlerin düzensiz akınları yönetmede karşılaştığı pratik güçlükler arasındaki karmaşık etkileşimler ortaya çıkarılmıştır. Medyanın ve siyasi söylemlerin kamuoyu algısını şekillendirmedeki rolü incelemiş ve göçmenlere yönelik korku ve klişelerin nasıl derinleştiği ortaya konulmuştur. Düzensiz göçün hem bir güvenlik tehdidi hem de insani bir mesele olarak çerçevelenmesi Avrupa toplumlarında kutuplaşmış tartışmalara yol açmaktadır. Göçmenler, demografik istikrar ve işgücü piyasalarına katkı sağlıyor olsalar da kültürel farklılıklar, ekonomik rekabet ve siyasi direnç nedeniyle entegrasyon süreçleri her geçen gün zorlu bir hal almaktadır. Düzensiz göç, üye ülkeler için hem zorluklar hem de fırsatlar sunmaktadır. Ancak ülkelerce birleşik bir göç politikası oluşturma çabaları, çelişen ulusal çıkarlar ve düzensiz göçe dair güvenilir veri eksikliği nedeniyle sürekli sekteye uğramaktadır. Sosyal istikrarı sağlamak için insan onurunu merkeze alan ve sürdürülebilir, adil politikalar geliştirmeye yönelik ulusal ve Avrupa Birliği düzeyinde koordineli eylemler gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Düzensiz Göç
• Avrupa Birliği (AB)
• Sosyal Entegrasyon
• Kamu Algısı
• Stereotipler

Europe’s Migration Dilemma: The Social and Political Impacts of Irregular Migration

Öz

Irregular immigration has become a challenge for the European Union, with social, economic and political implications. This study explores the underlying causes of irregular immigration, the challenges in defining it, and the perceived threats to national sovereignty and social cohesion. The study reveals the intricate interplay between immigration policies; human rights considerations and the practical challenges member states face in managing irregular flows. The study also examines the role of media and political discourses in shaping public perceptions, demonstrating how fears and stereotypes of immigrants have deepened. The framing of irregular immigration as both a security threat and a humanitarian issue has led to polarized debates in European societies. While immigrants contribute to demographic stability and labor markets, integration processes are increasingly challenging due to cultural differences, economic competition and political resistance. Irregular immigration is therefore seen to present both challenges and opportunities for Member States. However, efforts by these countries to establish a unified migration policy are constantly hampered by conflicting national interests and a lack of reliable data on irregular migration. To ensure the development of sustainable and fair policies centered on human dignity, and thus ensure social stability, there is a necessity for coordinated action at both the national and European Union level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Irregular Migration
• European Union (EU)
• Social Integration
• Public Perception
• Stereotypes

Kaynakça

1. Alesina, A., Harnoss, J. ve Rapoport, H. (2021). Immigration and the future of the welfare state in Europe. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 697(1), 120-147.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211055409
2. Ambrosini, M. (2008). Irregular immigration: Economic convenience and other factors. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 14(4), 557-575. https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890801400404
3. Amca, Y., Yorucu, V. ve Kırıkkaleli, D. (2025). Construction cost index: Political, economic, and financial risk indices within the European continent. Sustainability, 17(3), 917. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030917
4. Antoniucci, V. ve Marella, G. (2017). Immigrants and the city: The relevance of immigration on housing price gradient. Buildings, 7(4), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7040091
5. Ayas, M. Ö. (2024). Yükselen popülizmin gölgesinde değişen göç politikaları. Journal of Migration and Political Studies, 2(1), 27-38.
6. Bartkó, R. (2017). Irregular migration and terrorism in the European Union. Journal of Eastern European Criminal Law, 2017(1), 149-154. https://jeecl.ro/index.php/jeecl/article/view/1822
7. Bélanger, D. ve Silvey, R. (2019). An im/mobility turn: Power geometries of care and migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(16), 3423–3440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1592396
8. Benjelloun, S. (2021). Morocco’s new migration policy: Between geostrategic interests and incomplete implementation. The Journal of North African Studies, 26(5), 875-892.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2020.1800207

9. Berg‐Sørensen, A. (2017). ‘Submission’: Ambiguity, hypocrisy and misanthropy in Michel Houellebecq’s imaginary politics. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(2), 131-145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2017.1306957
10. Bircan, T. ve Yilmaz, S. (2023). A critique of gender‐blind migration theories and data sources. International Migration, 61(4), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13088
11. Borodak, D. ve Tichit, A. (2013). Should we stay or should we go? Irregular migration and duration of stay: The case of Moldovan migrants. Migration Studies, 2(3), 415-437.  https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnt016
12. Brochmann, G. (2020). Controlling immigration in Europe. G. Brochmann ve T. Hammar (Ed.), Mechanisms of immigration control: A comparative analysis of European regulation policies içinde (ss. 297–334). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003086062
13. Buoncompagni, G. (2021). Misinformation, stereotypes and perceptions of institutions: The perspective of young Italians on immigration after the “shootings in Macerata”. Open Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojps.2021.112014
14. Buzatu, N.-E. (2018). The migrant smuggling crime in Romania. Proceedings of the 8th International RAIS Conference on Social Sciences içinde (ss. 194–204). Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1215152
15. Caballero Vélez, D. ve Krapivnitskaya, E. (2020). The EU migration policy securitization process: From a domestic to a foreign dimension. Studia z Polityki Publicznej, 7(4), 105-122.  https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP/2020.4.6
16. Caselli, F., Lin, H. H., Toscani, F. G. ve Yao, J. (2024). Migration into the EU: Stocktaking of Recent Developments and Macroeconomic Implications. IMF Working Papers, 2024(211). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400289552.001
17. Castelli, F. (2018). Drivers of migration: Why do people move? Journal of Travel Medicine, 25(1), tay040. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tay040
18. Castles, S. (2006). Global perspectives on forced migration. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 15(1), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/011719680601500102
19. Claassen, C. ve McLaren, L. (2022). Does immigration produce a public backlash or public acceptance? Time-series, cross-sectional evidence from thirty European democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 1013-1031. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000260
20. Colombo, S. ve Checchi, F. (2018). Decision-making in humanitarian crises: Politics, and not only evidence, is the problem. Epidemiologia e Prevenzione, 42(3-4), 214-225.  https://doi.org/10.19191/EP18.3-4.P214.069
21. Csanyi, P. ve Kucharčík, R. (2023). Central European leaders’ attitudes towards the migration and the migration crisis. Journal of Comparative Politics, 16(2), 20-37.  https://www.cpupi.si/assets/jcp/Articles-2023/JCP-July23-2.pdf
22. Cvajner, M. ve Sciortino, G. (2010). Theorizing irregular migration: The control of spatial mobility in differentiated societies. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(3), 389-404.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010371764
23. Dancygier, R. (2024). The future of multiracial democracy: Liberal democracy in an age of immigration. Journal of Democracy, 35(4), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2024.a937734
24. Das, R. (2025). Changing contours of dealing with refugee crisis in EU: A comparative study of Ukrainian and Syrian refugee crisis. Journal of Migration and Political Studies, 3(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.69510/mipos.1557510
25. De la Rica, S., Glitz, A. ve Ortega, F. (2015). Immigration in Europe: Trends, policies, and empirical evidence. B. R. Chiswick ve P. W. Miller (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of international migration içinde (Cilt 1, ss. 1303–1362). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53768-3.00024-2
26. Demircioglu, M. A. ve Vivona, R. (2021). Depoliticizing the European immigration debate: How to employ public sector innovation to integrate migrants. Research Policy, 50(2), 104150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104150
27. Dibeh, G., Fakih, A. ve Marrouch, W. (2019). Labor market and institutional drivers of youth irregular migration in the Middle East and North Africa region. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(2), 225-251. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185618788085
28. Dobrіanska, N. A., Demyanyuk, A. A. ve Shvets, V. O. (2021). Analysis of illegal migration and government policy to eliminate it. Economics: Time Realities, 2021(2), 21-26.  https://doi.org/10.15276/etr.02.2021.3
29. Düvell, F. (2006). Irregular migration: A global, historical and economic perspective. F. Düvell (Ed.), Illegal immigration in Europe: Beyond control? içinde (ss. 14–39). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230555020_2
30. Dylong, P. ve Uebelmesser, S. (2024). Biased beliefs about immigration and economic concerns: Evidence from representative experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 217, 453-482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.11.017
31. Esterline, C. ve Batalova, J. (2022). Frequently requested statistics on immigrants. Migration Policy Institute.  https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/source_images/FRS2022-print_version_FINAL.pdf
32. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2025). Fundamental rights report 2025. Publications Office of the European Union. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2025/fundamental-rights-report-2025
33. Fakhoury, J., Burton‐Jeangros, C., Consoli, L., Duvoisin, A., Courvoisier, D. S. ve Jackson, Y. (2021). Mental health of undocumented migrants and migrants undergoing regularization in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03149-7
34. Favell, A. (2009). Immigration, migration, and free movement in the making of Europe. J. T. Checkel ve P. J. Katzenstein (Ed.), European identity içinde (ss. 167–189). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806247.008
35. Fernández-Reino, M., Sumption, M. ve Vargas-Silva, C. (2020). From low-skilled to key workers: The implications of emergencies for immigration policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(Supplement 1), S382-S396. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa016
36. Gkliati, M. (2023). Let’s call it what it is: Hybrid threats and instrumentalisation as the evolution of securitisation in migration management. European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 8(2), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/675
37. Häkli, J. ve Peltonen, N. (2026). The European Union as a humanitarian border: The production of vulnerability in the New Pact on Migration and Asylum. Space and Polity, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2026.2635505
38. Hatton, T. J. (2021). Public opinion on immigration in Europe: Preference and salience. European Journal of Political Economy, 66, 101969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101969
39. Heizmann, B. ve Huth, N. (2021). Economic conditions and perceptions of immigrants as an economic threat in Europe: Temporal dynamics and mediating processes. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62(1), 56-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715221993529
40. Hierholzer, R. (2023). Migration as a ‘European Problem’: The discourse of ‘Europeanness’ in migration policy and news articles in the European Union [Master’s thesis, Utrecht University.] https://studenttheses.uu.nl/handle/20.500.12932/45566
41. Hoxhaj, R. ve Zuccotti, C. V. (2021). The complex relationship between immigrants’ concentration, socioeconomic environment and attitudes towards immigrants in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44(2), 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1730926
42. Humphrey, M. (2013). Migration, security and insecurity. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 34(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2013.781982
43. International Organization for Migration. (2019). World migration report 2020.  https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_2020.pdf
44. Jaime-Castillo, A. M., Marqués-Perales, I. ve Álvarez-Gálvez, J. (2016). The impact of social expenditure on attitudes towards immigration in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 126, 1089-1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0939-0
45. Jordan, B. ve Düvell, F. (2002). Irregular migration. Edward Elgar Publishing.  https://www.elgaronline.com/monobook/1843760274.xml
46. Kalantaryan, S. ve Alessandrini, A. (2020). Housing values and the residential settlement of migrants: Zooming in on neighbourhoods in Italian provincial capitals. Spatial Demography, 8(3), 293-350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-020-00068-1
47. Koinova, M. (2025). Governing transit and irregular migration: Informality and formal policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 51(2), 423-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2371204
48. Kraler, A. ve Reichel, D. (2011). Measuring irregular migration and population flows - What available data can tell. International Migration, 49(5), 97-128.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2011.00699.x
49. Lahav, G. (2004). Immigration and politics in the new Europe: Reinventing borders. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491719
50. Lattof, S. R. (2018). Collecting data from migrants in Ghana: Lessons learned using respondent-driven sampling. Demographic Research, 38, 1017-1058. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2018.38.36
51. Léonard, S. ve Kaunert, C. (2022). The securitisation of migration in the European Union: Frontex and its evolving security practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48(6), 1417–1429. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851469
52. Mason, D. M. (2016). Caring for the unseen: Using linking social capital to improve healthcare access to irregular migrants in Spain. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(5), 448-456.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12228
53. Mitsilegas, V. (2022). The EU external border as a site of preventive (in)justice. European Law Journal, 28(4-6), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12444
54. Moreh, C., McGhee, D. ve Vlachantoni, A. (2020). The return of citizenship? An empirical assessment of legal integration in times of radical sociolegal transformation. International Migration Review, 54(1), 147-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318809924
55. Moreno-Fernández, O., Guichot-Muñoz, E., De Sarlo, G. ve León-Sánchez, M. (2020). Analysing stereotypes and prejudices about immigrant students in European secondary education. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.9.8.1
56. Nesterova, A. A., Suslova, T. F., Tsyganov, E. ve Kobzeva, N. Y. V. (2015). Migration as a social problem. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p111
57. Nkwunonwo, U. C. ve Ikegwuruka, C. U. (2020). Theological mediation of the current alterity in western naturalisation policy, immigration control and global diaspora. International Journal of Law and Society, 3(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20200301.15
58. O’Connor, K. J. (2020). The effect of immigration on natives’ well-being in the European Union. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 257-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.10.006
59. Oezel, Y. (2015). Providing security? Border control and the politics of migration in the EU. E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2015/06/08/providing-security-border-control-and-the-politics-of-migration-in-the- eu/
60. Oliveira Martins, B., Lidén, K. ve Jumbert, M. G. (2022). Border security and the digitalisation of sovereignty: Insights from EU borderwork. European Security, 31(3), 475-494.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101884
61. Petricevic, V. (2018). Unwanted immigration: Has the concept of state sovereignty become obsolete? Canadian Global Affairs Institute.  https://www.cgai.ca/unwanted_immigration_has_the_concept_of_state_sovereignty_become_obsolete
62. Petroni, N. (2020). EU integration and policy (in)coherence towards irregular migration. M. Harwood, S. Moncada ve R. Pace (Ed.), The future of the European Union: Demisting the debate içinde (ss. 230–241). Institute for European Studies, University of Malta. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/bitstream/123456789/52313/1/The_future_of_the_European_Union_demi sting_the_debate_2020.pdf#page=230
63. Piper, N., Rother, S. ve Rüland, J. (2017). Challenging state sovereignty in the age of migration: A multi-level approach to Southeast and East Asian migration. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(2), 191-192. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-01602005
64. Seubert, S. (2019). Shifting boundaries of membership: The politicisation of free movement as a challenge for EU citizenship. European Law Journal, 26(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12346
65. Sheryazdanova, K. (2015). Illegal immigration and fight against illegal migration in member states of the European Union. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, European and Regional Studies, 8(1), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1515/auseur-2015-0015
66. Silva, M. (2025). Eyes on the border: Analysing the impact of surveillance systems on European border control and migration management [Master’s thesis, Charles University]. Charles University Digital Repository. https://dspace.cuni.cz/bitstream/handle/20.500.11956/207247/120516925.pdf?sequence=1
67. Spencer, S. ve Triandafyllidou, A. (2022). Irregular migration. P. Scholten (Ed.), Introduction to migration studies: An interactive guide to the literatures on migration and diversity içinde (ss. 191–204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8_12
68. Spektorowski, A. (2021). Michel Houellebecq and the “political triangle”: The republic, the radical right, and the “ultimate other.” M. S. Kochin ve A. Spektorowski (Ed.), Michel Houellebecq, the Cassandra of freedom: Submission and decline içinde (ss. 41–64). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004498136_004
69. Straßmayr, C., Matanov, A., Priebe, S., Barros, H., Canavan, R., Díaz-Olalla, J. M., Gabor, E., Gaddini, A., Greacen, T., Holcnerová, P., Kluge, U., Welbel, M., Nicaise, P., Schene, A. H.,
70. Soares, J. J. ve Katschnig, H. (2012). Mental health care for irregular migrants in Europe: Barriers and how they are overcome. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-367
71. Tauscher, S. (2024). COVID-19 salgınının Almanya iç ve dış siyasetinde yarattığı risk ve imkânlar. Journal of Migration and Political Studies, 2(1), 1-26.
72. Thomas, N. (2020). Immigration: The “illegal alien” problem. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 70(2), 270-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2020.1718504
73. Thompson, L. (2013). Protection of migrants’ rights and state sovereignty. UN Chronicle, 50(3), 8-11.  https://www.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl2616/files/2018-07/DDGs_commentary_Protection_of_Migrants.pdf
74. Triandafyllidou, A. ve Ricard-Guay, A. (2019). Governing irregular and return migration in the 2020s: European challenges and Asian Pacific perspectives. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17(2), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1503383
75. Ullah, A. A., Lee, S. C. W., Hassan, N. H. ve Nawaz, F. (2020). Xenophobia in the GCC countries: Migrants’ desire and distress. Global Affairs, 6(2), 203-223.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1738951
76. Van der Woude, M. (2020). A patchwork of intra-Schengen policing: Border games over national identity and national sovereignty. Theoretical Criminology, 24(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480619871615
77. Wahab, A., Khan, M. J. ve Ullah, I. (2021). Causes and consequences of illegal emigration: A case study of District Swat, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Research, 3(1), 21–32. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b60d/bd2cd79e6cbbc1941df825bc840d66990728.pdf
78. Williams, R. ve Sweeney, C. (2019). Introduction, ‘La France, ce n’est pas Michel Houellebecq’. Modern & Contemporary France, 27(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639489.2018.1563587