Research Article

Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software

Volume: 4 Number: 3 January 14, 2025
EN

Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software

Abstract

Aim: To assess three different level experienced nuclear medicine specialists’ intra- and interobserver variability of semiquantitative visual interpretations of left ventricular (LV) myocardial perfusion, wall motion (WM), and wall thickening (WT) in gated myocardial perfusion single- photon emission tomography (gMPS), and to compare the compatibility between the observers’ and coronary angiography (CAG) reports. Methods: A 5-point perfusion scale, a 6-point scale for WM, and a 4-point scale for WT were used to score each segment. The images were interpreted 3 times at least one-month intervals separately by 3 observers. Subsequently, the visual semiquantitative summed scores for stress (SSS) and rest (SRS) were calculated by summing the respective segmental perfusion scores. Summed difference score (SDS) was also calculated as the difference between SSS and SRS. Both visual semiquantitative WM and WT scores were calculated from the stress images by summing all corresponding segmental scores. Results: Intraobserver agreement in the evaluation of global perfusion was statistically significant (71.9-100 %). There was a significant agreement in all LAD-SSS, Cx-SSS, ve RCA-SSS interpretations. There was good agreement between 3 readings of 3 observers' (p=0.0). Due to the high interobserver agreement levels in the global evaluation, the mean values of the 1. and the 2. interpretations (mean 1.-2. int.) were calculated and regional comparisons were made with this new value and the 3. interpretation. There was a a significant agreement in 3 of the regional SSS interpretations. Although lowest agreement rates were calculated in LAD artery territory, the agreement levels were statistically, and highly significant in all territories. In both Cx and RCA territories, the agreement levels were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The interobserver and intraobserver agreement levels of perfusion interpretations were significant both in the global and regional base. There was a significant agreement between the visual interpretations and CAG results, especially in the Cx and RCA artery territories. The interobserver and intraobserver agreements were higher in WM scores than wall thickness scores. QPS/QGS software quantitative perfusion and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values showed high repeatability.

Keywords

References

  1. Matsuo, S., Nakajima, K., & Kinuya, S. (2010). Clinical use of nuclear cardiology in the assessment of heart failure. World journal of cardiology, 2(10), 344–356. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v2.i10.344
  2. Berman, D. S., Kiat, H., Friedman, J. D., Wang, F. P., van Train, K., Matzer, L., Maddahi, J., & Germano, G. (1993). Separate acquisition rest thallium-201/stress technetium-99m sestamibi dual-isotope myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography: a clinical validation study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 22(5), 1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90557-h
  3. Berman, D. S., Abidov, A., Kang, X., Hayes, S. W., Friedman, J. D., Sciammarella, M. G., Cohen, I., Gerlach, J., Waechter, P. B., Germano, G., & Hachamovitch, R. (2004). Prognostic validation of a 17-segment score derived from a 20-segment score for myocardial perfusion SPECT interpretation. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 11(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.03.033 Golub, R. J., Ahlberg, A. W., McClellan, J. R., Herman, S. D., Travin, M. I., Mather, J. F., Aitken, P. W., Baron, J. I., & Heller, G. V. (1999). Interpretive reproducibility of stress Tc-99m sestamibi tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 6(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1071-3581(99)90037-5
  4. Mehrotra, P., Labib, S. B., & Schick, E. C. (2012). Differential effects of dobutamine versus treadmill exercise on left ventricular volume and wall stress. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography, 25(8), 911–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.05.002
  5. Hara, M., Monzen, H., Futai, R., Inagaki, K., Shimoyama, H., Morikawa, M., Tomioka, N., Konishi, T., Watanabe, Y., Yuki, R., Kobayashi, H., & Hirose, K. (2008). Reduction of infracardiac intestinal activity by a small amount of soda water in technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with adenosine stress. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 15(2), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.09.029
  6. Xu, Y., Hayes, S., Ali, I., Ruddy, T. D., Wells, R. G., Berman, D. S., Germano, G., & Slomka, P. J. (2010). Automatic and visual reproducibility of perfusion and function measures for myocardial perfusion SPECT. Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 17(6), 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-010-9297-0
  7. Konno, M., Morita, K., Adachi, I., Ito, Y., Kohya, T., Kitabatake, A., Tsukamoto, E., & Tamaki, N. (2001). Quantitative analysis of regional wall motion and thickening by quantitative gated SPECT: comparison with visual analysis. Clinical nuclear medicine, 26(3), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003072-200103000-00004
  8. Germano, G., Erel, J., Lewin, H., Kavanagh, P. B., & Berman, D. S. (1997). Automatic quantitation of regional myocardial wall motion and thickening from gated technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30(5), 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00276-3

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Cardiology, Nuclear Medicine

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 14, 2025

Submission Date

December 12, 2024

Acceptance Date

January 2, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 4 Number: 3

APA
Tokbay, D., Öztürk, E., & Erim, İ. (2025). Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software. Molecular Oncologic Imaging, 4(3), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1596275
AMA
1.Tokbay D, Öztürk E, Erim İ. Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. 2025;4(3):27-38. doi:10.71286/moi.1596275
Chicago
Tokbay, Duygu, Emel Öztürk, and İrem Erim. 2025. “Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS QPS Software”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 4 (3): 27-38. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1596275.
EndNote
Tokbay D, Öztürk E, Erim İ (January 1, 2025) Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 4 3 27–38.
IEEE
[1]D. Tokbay, E. Öztürk, and İ. Erim, “Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software”, Molecular Oncologic Imaging, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 27–38, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.71286/moi.1596275.
ISNAD
Tokbay, Duygu - Öztürk, Emel - Erim, İrem. “Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS QPS Software”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging 4/3 (January 1, 2025): 27-38. https://doi.org/10.71286/moi.1596275.
JAMA
1.Tokbay D, Öztürk E, Erim İ. Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. 2025;4:27–38.
MLA
Tokbay, Duygu, et al. “Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS QPS Software”. Molecular Oncologic Imaging, vol. 4, no. 3, Jan. 2025, pp. 27-38, doi:10.71286/moi.1596275.
Vancouver
1.Duygu Tokbay, Emel Öztürk, İrem Erim. Intra-Interobserver Variability in Myocardial Perfusion and Function Interpretation and Reproducibility of QGS/QPS Software. Molecular Oncologic Imaging. 2025 Jan. 1;4(3):27-38. doi:10.71286/moi.1596275