Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Hayvanlar Dümende: Antroposen'de Kurtuluş ve Dayanışmayı "Flow" Üzerinden Yeniden Düşünmek

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 361 - 385, 19.01.2026
https://izlik.org/JA94KR37MT

Öz

Bu makale, Gints Zilbalodis’in diyalogsuz animasyonu Flow’u Antroposen bağlamında posthümanist ve ekokritik bir çerçevede çözümler. Çalışma, Braidotti, Haraway, Garrard ve iklim adaleti literatürüyle filmdeki anlatı yapısı, görsel-işitsel atmosfer ve hayvan temsillerini inceler. Tufan ve “Nuh’un Gemisi” motifinin insan-merkezcilikten uzak biçimde tersyüz edilişi, türlerarası dayanışma ile çatışmanın birlikte varlığı ve finaldeki karaya vuran deniz canlısı üzerinden ekolojik yas teması öne çıkar. Bulgular, Flow’un hayvanları özneleştirerek antropomorfizme kapılmadan empati kurdurduğunu; iklim göçü ve müşterek kırılganlık gibi kavramları şiirsel bir dille görünür kıldığını gösterir. Sonuç olarak film, animasyonun Antroposen’i temsil etme gücünü teyit eder ve etik-politik sorumluluklara dair düşünmeyi teşvik eder. Ayrıca çalışma, sessizlik, renk paleti ve uzun planların izleyiciyi türlerarası bakışa yönlendiren estetik stratejiler olarak nasıl işlediğini tartışır.

Kaynakça

  • Aydın, G. (2025). Flow: A cat’s journey. North Express. Retrieved October 3, 2025, from https://www.kuzeyekspres.com.tr/makale/23682309/gokhan-aydin/flow-bir-kedinin-yolculugu-inceleme
  • Beeler, K., & Beeler, S. (Eds.). (2022). Animals in narrative film and television: Strange and familiar creatures. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/animals-in-narrative-film-and-television-9781666904819/
  • Bekaroğlu, E. (2022). Antroposen: Küresel Değişimin Politiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(2), 1130-1149.
  • Biermann, F., & Boas, I. (2010). Preparing for a warmer world: Towards a global governance system to protect climate refugees. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 60–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.60
  • Block, B. (2008). The visual story: Creating the visual structure of film, TV, and digital media (2nd ed.). Focal Press.
  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2010). Film art: An introduction (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Burgos, E. (2025). In the Place of the Donkey: The Subjectivity of the Nonhuman Animal and the Anti-speciesist Perspective in Eo. L’Atalante. Revista de estudios cinematográficos, (40), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.63700/1269
  • Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114(30), E6089-E6096.
  • Chion, M. (1994). Audio-vision: Sound on screen (C. Gorbman, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
  • Coyle, J. (2025). Movie review: A wordless Latvian cat parable about climate change is the year’s best-animated movie. AP News. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://apnews.com/article/flow-animated-movie-review-98940a387edd5f83354719f51139bc33
  • Creed, B., & Reesink, M. (2015). Animals, images, anthropocentrism. NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2015.1.CREE
  • Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The "Anthropocene". IGBP Newsletter, (41), 17-18.
  • Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2
  • Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (M. L. Mallet, Ed.; D. Wills, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
  • Doyle, J. (2011). Mediating climate change. Ashgate.
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864
  • Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hell, J., & Schönle, A. (Eds.). (2010). Ruins of modernity. Duke University Press.
  • International Union of Geological Sciences, & International Commission on Stratigraphy. (2024). Joint statement by IUGS and ICS. Retrieved December 16, 2025, from https://stratigraphy.org/news/152
  • Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kautz, A. (2024). Humanising the Nonhuman: An ecocritical Toolbox for Anthropomorphic Agency. Ecozon European Journal of Literature Culture and Environment, 15(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2024.15.2.4813
  • Koncz, L., & Boas, A. V. (2024). Climate Migration in Post-Apocalyptic Narratives on the Mainstream Screen. Religions, 15(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020231
  • Kozan, E. (2025). Yakın Dönem Türk Sinemasında İnsan-Hayvan İlişkisinin Temsiline Eleştirel Bakış: “Sivas” ve “Jîn” Film Örnekleri. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (İNİF E-Dergi), 10, 821–846. https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.1736898
  • Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity Press.
  • Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Verso.
  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
  • Mattson, M., & Gordon, N. (2022). Becoming mutant: Metamorphoses for a waterworld. Environmental Humanities, 14(1), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9481418
  • Moore, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
  • Mulkey, S. K. (2025). How do you survive the end of the world? Oscar-nominated 'Flow' offers an answer through the eyes of a cat. Grist. Retrieved October 31, 2025, from https://grist.org/culture/flow-oscars-golden-globes-climate-cat-movie-review/
  • Newman, J. (2013). Videogames (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Pick, A. (2011). Creaturely poetics: Animality and vulnerability in literature and film. Columbia University Press.
  • Reed, C. L. (2025). A conversation with Gints Zilbalodis (Flow). Hammer to Nail. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.hammertonail.com/interviews/gints-zilbalodis
  • Ritvo, H. (2007). On the animal turn. Dædalus, 136(4), 118–121.
  • Rust, S., & Monani, S. (Eds.). (2013). Ecocinema theory and practice. Routledge.
  • Sanders, Z. (2024, October 9). Interview: “Flow” Director Gints Zilbalodis on his Dialogue-less Animated Feature. The Film Stage. Retrieved December 12, 2025, from https://thefilmstage.com/flow-director-gints-zilbalodis-on-animating-animals-allegories-and-cinema-vs-videogames/
  • Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37-55.
  • Solnit, R. (2010). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. Penguin Books.
  • Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867.
  • Tarcan, U., & Kancı, T. (2022). Öteki Olarak İnsan: Posthümanist Kuramda Öznellik ve İdeoloji. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(15), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.15.109
  • Taşdizen, B. (2024). Yaşamın Kıyısında Türler Arası Eşiktelik: Hanım’da (1989) İnsan-Hayvan Yoldaşlığı. REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2024.161
  • Trexler, A. (2015). Anthropocene fictions: The novel in a time of climate change. University of Virginia Press.
  • UNHCR. (2023). Global Trends Report 2022-United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
  • Weisman, A. (2007). The world without us. St. Martin's Press.
  • Wells, P. (1998). Understanding animation. Routledge.
  • Wilson, R. (2019). Killer capitalism: The Anthropocene and Korean-global film. boundary 2, 46(3), 199–230.
  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
  • Zhang, C. (2024). “To See With Eyes Unclouded”: Nonhuman selves and semiosis in Princess Mononoke. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2024.15.1.5200

Animals At The Helm: Rethinking Redemption and Solidarity in The Anthropocene Through “Flow”

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 361 - 385, 19.01.2026
https://izlik.org/JA94KR37MT

Öz

This article analyzes Gints Zilbalodis' dialogue-free animation Flow within a posthumanist and ecocritical framework in the context of the Anthropocene. The study examines the film's narrative structure, audiovisual atmosphere, and animal representations in relation to the literature of Braidotti, Haraway, Garrard, and climate justice. The reversal of the flood and "Noah's Ark" motifs away from anthropocentrism, as well as the coexistence of interspecies solidarity and conflict, and the ecological lament theme, are highlighted through the final beached sea creature. The findings demonstrate that Flow humanizes animals, enabling empathy without resorting to anthropomorphism, and renders concepts such as climate migration and shared vulnerability more visible through poetic language. In conclusion, the film highlights the power of animation to represent the Anthropocene and prompts reflection on the ethical and political responsibilities that accompany it. The study also discusses how silence, color palette, and long shots function as aesthetic strategies that guide the viewer toward an intergeneric perspective.

Kaynakça

  • Aydın, G. (2025). Flow: A cat’s journey. North Express. Retrieved October 3, 2025, from https://www.kuzeyekspres.com.tr/makale/23682309/gokhan-aydin/flow-bir-kedinin-yolculugu-inceleme
  • Beeler, K., & Beeler, S. (Eds.). (2022). Animals in narrative film and television: Strange and familiar creatures. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/animals-in-narrative-film-and-television-9781666904819/
  • Bekaroğlu, E. (2022). Antroposen: Küresel Değişimin Politiği. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 62(2), 1130-1149.
  • Biermann, F., & Boas, I. (2010). Preparing for a warmer world: Towards a global governance system to protect climate refugees. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 60–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.60
  • Block, B. (2008). The visual story: Creating the visual structure of film, TV, and digital media (2nd ed.). Focal Press.
  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2010). Film art: An introduction (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
  • Burgos, E. (2025). In the Place of the Donkey: The Subjectivity of the Nonhuman Animal and the Anti-speciesist Perspective in Eo. L’Atalante. Revista de estudios cinematográficos, (40), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.63700/1269
  • Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., & Dirzo, R. (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 114(30), E6089-E6096.
  • Chion, M. (1994). Audio-vision: Sound on screen (C. Gorbman, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
  • Coyle, J. (2025). Movie review: A wordless Latvian cat parable about climate change is the year’s best-animated movie. AP News. Retrieved October 19, 2025, from https://apnews.com/article/flow-animated-movie-review-98940a387edd5f83354719f51139bc33
  • Creed, B., & Reesink, M. (2015). Animals, images, anthropocentrism. NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.5117/NECSUS2015.1.CREE
  • Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The "Anthropocene". IGBP Newsletter, (41), 17-18.
  • Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2
  • Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am (M. L. Mallet, Ed.; D. Wills, Trans.). Fordham University Press.
  • Doyle, J. (2011). Mediating climate change. Ashgate.
  • Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864
  • Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (Eds.). (1996). The ecocriticism reader: Landmarks in literary ecology. University of Georgia Press.
  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hell, J., & Schönle, A. (Eds.). (2010). Ruins of modernity. Duke University Press.
  • International Union of Geological Sciences, & International Commission on Stratigraphy. (2024). Joint statement by IUGS and ICS. Retrieved December 16, 2025, from https://stratigraphy.org/news/152
  • Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Kautz, A. (2024). Humanising the Nonhuman: An ecocritical Toolbox for Anthropomorphic Agency. Ecozon European Journal of Literature Culture and Environment, 15(2), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.37536/ecozona.2024.15.2.4813
  • Koncz, L., & Boas, A. V. (2024). Climate Migration in Post-Apocalyptic Narratives on the Mainstream Screen. Religions, 15(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020231
  • Kozan, E. (2025). Yakın Dönem Türk Sinemasında İnsan-Hayvan İlişkisinin Temsiline Eleştirel Bakış: “Sivas” ve “Jîn” Film Örnekleri. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (İNİF E-Dergi), 10, 821–846. https://doi.org/10.47107/inifedergi.1736898
  • Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity Press.
  • Malm, A. (2016). Fossil capital: The rise of steam power and the roots of global warming. Verso.
  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
  • Mattson, M., & Gordon, N. (2022). Becoming mutant: Metamorphoses for a waterworld. Environmental Humanities, 14(1), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9481418
  • Moore, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press.
  • Mulkey, S. K. (2025). How do you survive the end of the world? Oscar-nominated 'Flow' offers an answer through the eyes of a cat. Grist. Retrieved October 31, 2025, from https://grist.org/culture/flow-oscars-golden-globes-climate-cat-movie-review/
  • Newman, J. (2013). Videogames (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  • Pick, A. (2011). Creaturely poetics: Animality and vulnerability in literature and film. Columbia University Press.
  • Reed, C. L. (2025). A conversation with Gints Zilbalodis (Flow). Hammer to Nail. Retrieved December 11, 2025, from https://www.hammertonail.com/interviews/gints-zilbalodis
  • Ritvo, H. (2007). On the animal turn. Dædalus, 136(4), 118–121.
  • Rust, S., & Monani, S. (Eds.). (2013). Ecocinema theory and practice. Routledge.
  • Sanders, Z. (2024, October 9). Interview: “Flow” Director Gints Zilbalodis on his Dialogue-less Animated Feature. The Film Stage. Retrieved December 12, 2025, from https://thefilmstage.com/flow-director-gints-zilbalodis-on-animating-animals-allegories-and-cinema-vs-videogames/
  • Schlosberg, D. (2013). Theorising environmental justice: The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37-55.
  • Solnit, R. (2010). A paradise built in hell: The extraordinary communities that arise in disaster. Penguin Books.
  • Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867.
  • Tarcan, U., & Kancı, T. (2022). Öteki Olarak İnsan: Posthümanist Kuramda Öznellik ve İdeoloji. Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(15), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.32739/uskudarsbd.8.15.109
  • Taşdizen, B. (2024). Yaşamın Kıyısında Türler Arası Eşiktelik: Hanım’da (1989) İnsan-Hayvan Yoldaşlığı. REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(2), 307–329. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2024.161
  • Trexler, A. (2015). Anthropocene fictions: The novel in a time of climate change. University of Virginia Press.
  • UNHCR. (2023). Global Trends Report 2022-United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
  • Weisman, A. (2007). The world without us. St. Martin's Press.
  • Wells, P. (1998). Understanding animation. Routledge.
  • Wilson, R. (2019). Killer capitalism: The Anthropocene and Korean-global film. boundary 2, 46(3), 199–230.
  • Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
  • Zhang, C. (2024). “To See With Eyes Unclouded”: Nonhuman selves and semiosis in Princess Mononoke. Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2024.15.1.5200
Toplam 52 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İletişim ve Medya Çalışmaları (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Fazıl Akdağ 0000-0002-3316-8104

Gönderilme Tarihi 4 Haziran 2025
Kabul Tarihi 23 Aralık 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 19 Ocak 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2025.2.361-385
IZ https://izlik.org/JA94KR37MT
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2026 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Akdağ, F. (2026). Animals At The Helm: Rethinking Redemption and Solidarity in The Anthropocene Through “Flow”. Moment Dergi, 12(2), 361-385. https://doi.org/10.17572/mj2025.2.361-385