Research Article

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon

Volume: 39 Number: 3 August 30, 2022
EN

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon

Abstract

Biceps tendon disorders are substantial cause of intense shoulder pain thus require a careful medical attention. We compared the clinical outcomes of chronic rupture, tenotomy and tenodesis of proximal biceps tendon of patients underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We included 98 patients over 50 years-old who underwent arthroscopic surgery for rotator cuff tears and grouped as tenotomy, tenodesis and chronic rupture of biceps tendon. Preoperative and postoperative 24-months follow-up Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and the University of California–Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale scores were compared. Chronic biceps rupture was the most common pathology in massive rotator cuff rupture group (75.9%). As tenotomy, tenodesis and chronic rupture groups were compared in terms of VAS and UCLA score improvements (preoperative and postoperative change); tenotomy showed better outcomes and there was a significant difference between tenotomy and tenodesis groups in terms of improvements in VAS and UCLA scores (p = 0.036, p = 0.010, respectively). No significant difference between chronic rupture and tenodesis in terms of VAS and UCLA scores improvements were observed (p = 1.000, p = 0.250, respectively). Also, tenotomy showed superior VAS score improvement than chronic tendon rupture (p=0.024) however no significant difference was observed in UCLA score improvement between tenotomy and chronic rupture (p = 0.527). According to our study, tenotomy seems to be a more appropriate surgical method than tenodesis in massive and full-thickness rotator cuff tears with severe biceps tendon degeneration, and also it is not necessary to perform tenodesis in cases with chronic biceps rupture.

Keywords

References

  1. Referans1. Beall DP, Williamson EE, Ly JQ, Adkins MC, Emery RL, Jones TP, et al. Association of biceps tendon tears with rotator cuff abnormalities: degree of correlation with tears of the anterior and superior portions of the rotator cuff. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2003;180(3):633-9
  2. Referans2. Belay ES, Wittstein JR, Garrigues GE, Lassiter TE, Scribani M, Goldner RD, et al. Biceps tenotomy has earlier pain relief compared to biceps tenodesis: a randomized prospective study. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2019;27(12):4032-7
  3. Referans3. Boileau P, Baqué F, Valerio L, Ahrens P, Chuinard C, Trojani C. Isolated arthroscopic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis improves symptoms in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2007;89(4):747-57
  4. Referans4. Braun S, Horan MP, Elser F, Millett PJ. Lesions of the biceps pulley. The American journal of sports medicine. 2011;39(4):790-5
  5. Referans5. Carter AN, Erickson SM. Proximal biceps tendon rupture: primarily an injury of middle age. The Physician and sportsmedicine. 1999;27(6):95-101
  6. Referans6. Castricini R, Familiari F, De Gori M, Riccelli DA, De Benedetto M, Orlando N, et al. Tenodesis is not superior to tenotomy in the treatment of the long head of biceps tendon lesions. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2018;26(1):169-75
  7. Referans7. Chen CH, Hsu KY, Chen WJ, Shih CH. Incidence and severity of biceps long head tendon lesion in patients with complete rotator cuff tears. The Journal of trauma. 2005;58(6):1189-93
  8. Referans8. De Carli A, Vadalà A, Zanzotto E, Zampar G, Vetrano M, Iorio R, et al. Reparable rotator cuff tears with concomitant long-head biceps lesions: tenotomy or tenotomy/tenodesis? Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA. 2012;20(12):2553-8

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 30, 2022

Submission Date

February 8, 2022

Acceptance Date

May 17, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 39 Number: 3

APA
Can, F. İ., Gultac, E., Kılınç, C. Y., Şahin, İ. G., & Aydoğan, N. (2022). Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 39(3), 728-732. https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY
AMA
1.Can Fİ, Gultac E, Kılınç CY, Şahin İG, Aydoğan N. Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39(3):728-732. https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY
Chicago
Can, Fatih İlker, Emre Gultac, Cem Yalın Kılınç, İsmail Gökhan Şahin, and Nevres Aydoğan. 2022. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 (3): 728-32. https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY.
EndNote
Can Fİ, Gultac E, Kılınç CY, Şahin İG, Aydoğan N (August 1, 2022) Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 3 728–732.
IEEE
[1]F. İ. Can, E. Gultac, C. Y. Kılınç, İ. G. Şahin, and N. Aydoğan, “Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 728–732, Aug. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY
ISNAD
Can, Fatih İlker - Gultac, Emre - Kılınç, Cem Yalın - Şahin, İsmail Gökhan - Aydoğan, Nevres. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39/3 (August 1, 2022): 728-732. https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY.
JAMA
1.Can Fİ, Gultac E, Kılınç CY, Şahin İG, Aydoğan N. Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39:728–732.
MLA
Can, Fatih İlker, et al. “Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 39, no. 3, Aug. 2022, pp. 728-32, https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY.
Vancouver
1.Fatih İlker Can, Emre Gultac, Cem Yalın Kılınç, İsmail Gökhan Şahin, Nevres Aydoğan. Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Chronic Rupture, Arthroscopic Tenotomy and Tenodesis of Proximal Biceps Tendon. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 1;39(3):728-32. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA58HC35CY