Research Article

Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19

Volume: 41 Number: 1 March 29, 2024
EN

Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19

Abstract

We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of spinal or general anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S) delivery in parturient with coronavirus illness (COVID-19). We carried out a retrospective cohort in our tertiary care centre's anesthesiology and reanimation department. We gathered the data from the medical files of 108 pregnant women (average age: 33.44±12.65 years) with COVID-19 who underwent cesarean section (C/S) with either general (Group I, n=30) or spinal anesthesia (Group II, n=78). We compared preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative respiratory, cardiac, hematological, and biochemical indicators between spinal and general anesthesia groups. Patients in Group I were significantly older (p<0.001), had longer APTT (p=0.015), PT (p=0.005), INR (p=0.003), higher levels of AST (p=0.012), CK (p=0.001), CRP (p<0.001), as well as longer duration of ICU stay (p<0.001), and hospitalization (p<0.001). Group II had higher preoperative levels of troponin T (p=0.001). In Group I, the levels of procalcitonin (p=0.002), lactate (p<0.001), AST (p<0.010), ALT (p=0.001), CRP (p<0.001), and total bilirubin (p<0.001) were significantly higher than Group II. Group II displayed increased levels of white blood cell count (p=0.023), CK (p=0.047), and LDH (p=0.001). Our data demonstrated that the selection of the mode of anesthesia must provide safe, patient-centered care and safeguard every member of the obstetric team from COVID-19 infection. During planning for cesarean section (C/S), certain care and special precautions should be employed, and the type of anesthesia must be selected on an individualized basis.

Keywords

References

  1. Ring LE, Martinez R, Bernstein K, Landau R. What obstetricians should know about obstetric anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semin Perinatol. 2020;44:151277.
  2. Bauer ME, Bernstein K, Dinges E, Delgado C, El-Sharawi N, Sultan P, et al. Obstetric Anesthesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:7-15.
  3. Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:970-971.
  4. Mullins E, Evans D, Viner RM, O'Brien P, Morris E. Coronavirus in pregnancy and delivery: rapid review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55:586-592.
  5. Schwartz DA. An Analysis of 38 Pregnant Women With COVID-19, Their Newborn Infants, and Maternal-Fetal Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Maternal Coronavirus Infections and Pregnancy Outcomes. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020;144:799-805.
  6. Bani Hani DA, Alsharaydeh I, Bataineh AM, Al Athamneh M, Qamileh I, Al-Baik A, et al. Successful Anesthetic Management in Cesarean Section for Pregnant Woman with COVID-19. Am J Case Rep. 2020;21:e925512.
  7. Zeng L, Xia S, Yuan W, Yan K, Xiao F, Shao J, et al. Neonatal Early-Onset Infection With SARS-CoV-2 in 33 Neonates Born to Mothers With COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:722-725.
  8. Bampoe S, Odor PM, Lucas DN. Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. Practice recommendations for obstetric anaesthesia: what we have learned thus far. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020;43:1-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Anaesthesiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 29, 2024

Submission Date

July 6, 2023

Acceptance Date

January 10, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 41 Number: 1

APA
Aydın, N., Esen, O., & Tüten, N. (2024). Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 41(1), 20-27. https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR
AMA
1.Aydın N, Esen O, Tüten N. Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41(1):20-27. https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR
Chicago
Aydın, Nevin, Osman Esen, and Nevin Tüten. 2024. “Comparison of the Outcomes of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Pregnant Women With COVID-19”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41 (1): 20-27. https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR.
EndNote
Aydın N, Esen O, Tüten N (March 1, 2024) Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41 1 20–27.
IEEE
[1]N. Aydın, O. Esen, and N. Tüten, “Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 20–27, Mar. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR
ISNAD
Aydın, Nevin - Esen, Osman - Tüten, Nevin. “Comparison of the Outcomes of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Pregnant Women With COVID-19”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41/1 (March 1, 2024): 20-27. https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR.
JAMA
1.Aydın N, Esen O, Tüten N. Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41:20–27.
MLA
Aydın, Nevin, et al. “Comparison of the Outcomes of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in Pregnant Women With COVID-19”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 41, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 20-27, https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR.
Vancouver
1.Nevin Aydın, Osman Esen, Nevin Tüten. Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2024 Mar. 1;41(1):20-7. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA88WT95WR