Research Article

Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta

Volume: 41 Number: 2 May 19, 2024
EN

Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta

Abstract

Placenta accreta (PA) is a serious obstetric complication associated with maternal morbidity and mortality. While ultrasonography and MRI are effective in the third trimester, early diagnosis in the first two trimesters remains elusive. This study aims to explore the utility of biochemical markers in early PA detection, addressing a critical gap in current diagnostic approaches. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients diagnosed with placenta previa between October 2021 and December 2022. Cases were divided into PA and non-PA groups based on histopathological examination. Demographic, obstetric characteristics and serum analytes were compared between the groups to identify potential biomarkers for early PA detection. Patients with PA exhibited higher gravida, parity, and abortion numbers. First-trimester free β-hCG levels and second-trimester E3 levels were significantly elevated in the PA group compared to non-accreta cases. No significant differences were observed in PAPP-A, AFP, and second-trimester hCG levels. Additionally, postoperative leukocyte count was lower, and intrapartum bleeding frequency was higher in the PA group. Multiparity and the number of previous cesarean sections emerged as significant risk factors for PA, consistent with previous literature. While previous studies reported associations between biochemical markers and PA, this study uniquely identified significant associations with free β-hCG and E3 levels. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and elucidate their clinical implications.

Keywords

References

  1. Committee opinion no. 529: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 2012;120(1):207-211. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e340.
  2. Higgins MF, Monteith C, Foley M, O'Herlihy C. Real increasing incidence of hysterectomy for placenta accreta following previous caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Nov 2013;171(1):54-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.030.
  3. Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Thom EA, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. Jun 2006;107(6):1226-1232. doi: 10.1097/01.Aog.0000219750.79480.84.
  4. Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 2010;203(5):430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.013.
  5. Silver RM. Placenta accreta: we can do better! Bjog. Jul 2016;123(8):1356. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13583.
  6. Warshak CR, Eskander R, Hull AD, Scioscia AL, Mattrey RF, Benirschke K, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2006;108(3 Pt 1):573-581. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000233155.62906.6d.
  7. Comstock CH, Love JJ Jr, Bronsteen RA, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Huang RR, et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2004;190(4):1135-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.024.
  8. Lin TM, Galbert SP, Kiefer D, Spellacy WN, Gall S. Characterization of four human pregnancy-associated plasma proteins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 15 1974;118(2):223-236. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(74)90553-5.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 19, 2024

Submission Date

December 13, 2023

Acceptance Date

April 29, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 41 Number: 2

APA
Taşın, C., Kurtay, S., & Karakaş, T. (2024). Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 41(2), 290-293. https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ
AMA
1.Taşın C, Kurtay S, Karakaş T. Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41(2):290-293. https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ
Chicago
Taşın, Cuma, Sabri Kurtay, and Tuğba Karakaş. 2024. “Relationship Between First and Second Trimester Aneuploidy Screening Test Serum Analytes and Placenta Accreta”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41 (2): 290-93. https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ.
EndNote
Taşın C, Kurtay S, Karakaş T (May 1, 2024) Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41 2 290–293.
IEEE
[1]C. Taşın, S. Kurtay, and T. Karakaş, “Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 290–293, May 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ
ISNAD
Taşın, Cuma - Kurtay, Sabri - Karakaş, Tuğba. “Relationship Between First and Second Trimester Aneuploidy Screening Test Serum Analytes and Placenta Accreta”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 41/2 (May 1, 2024): 290-293. https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ.
JAMA
1.Taşın C, Kurtay S, Karakaş T. Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41:290–293.
MLA
Taşın, Cuma, et al. “Relationship Between First and Second Trimester Aneuploidy Screening Test Serum Analytes and Placenta Accreta”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 41, no. 2, May 2024, pp. 290-3, https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ.
Vancouver
1.Cuma Taşın, Sabri Kurtay, Tuğba Karakaş. Relationship between first and second trimester aneuploidy screening test serum analytes and placenta accreta. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2024 May 1;41(2):290-3. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA36BL94WZ