Research Article

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis

Volume: 42 Number: 3 September 30, 2025
EN

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis

Abstract

Management of Walled-Off Necrosis (WON) poses a high mortality risk with a non-interventional approach. Minimally invasive techniques, including endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy with a step-up approach, have gained prominence. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 18 patients (2016–2018) who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided cystogastrostomy, with 13 subsequently undergoing direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) using lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS). The insertion of cystogastrostomy stents was technically successful in all patients. Two patients experienced perforation following LAMS placement. Cyst size positively correlated with hospital stay duration. Between LAMS with pigtail (n=7) and without pigtail (n=6) groups, session numbers, stent duration, and hospital stay did not significantly differ, though numerical reductions were observed in pigtail cases. A moderate correlation existed between stent duration and amylase levels (r=-0.575, p=0.040). Percutaneous drainage catheters (PDC) were necessary in two patients without endoscopic access, and PDC patients had prolonged hospital stays. LAMS-supported EUS-DEN was a low-complication, high-success approach for symptomatic or infected WON. Perforation was identified as a severe complication. The addition of pigtail catheters within SEMS may positively impact session numbers, hospitalization duration, and stent residence time. Prospective cohorts are warranted for further validation.

Keywords

References

  1. van Brunschot S, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, et al. Treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2012;10(11):1190-1201.
  2. Dupuis CS, Baptista V, Whalen G, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis and its complications. Gastrointestinal Intervention. 2013;2(1):36-46.
  3. Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Nieuwenhuijs VB, et al. Minimally invasive'step-up approach'versus maximal necrosectomy in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis (PANTER trial): design and rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial [ISRCTN13975868]. BMC surgery. 2006;6(1):1-10.
  4. Lakhtakia S, Basha J, Talukdar R, et al. Endoscopic “step-up approach” using a dedicated biflanged metal stent reduces the need for direct necrosectomy in walled-off necrosis (with videos). Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2017;85(6):1243-1252.
  5. Gardner TB, Coelho-Prabhu N, Gordon SR, et al. Direct endoscopic necrosectomy for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis: results from a multicenter US series. Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 2011;73(4):718-726.
  6. Gulati R, Rustagi T. Endoscopic removal and replacement of the same lumen-apposing metal stent for multiple endoscopic necrosectomy sessions. Endoscopy. 2021;53(01):71-74.
  7. Van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG, Bakker OJ, et al. A step-up approach or open necrosectomy for necrotizing pancreatitis. New England journal of medicine. 2010;362(16):1491-1502.
  8. Van Brunschot S, Hollemans RA, Bakker OJ, et al. Minimally invasive and endoscopic versus open necrosectomy for necrotising pancreatitis: a pooled analysis of individual data for 1980 patients. Gut. 2018;67(4):697-706.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2025

Submission Date

October 4, 2024

Acceptance Date

August 5, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 42 Number: 3

APA
Kucukdemırcı, O., Avcıoğlu, U., & Bektaş, A. (2025). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 42(3), 242-246. https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL
AMA
1.Kucukdemırcı O, Avcıoğlu U, Bektaş A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2025;42(3):242-246. https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL
Chicago
Kucukdemırcı, Omer, Ufuk Avcıoğlu, and Ahmet Bektaş. 2025. “Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage and Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Patients With Walled-off Necrosis”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42 (3): 242-46. https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL.
EndNote
Kucukdemırcı O, Avcıoğlu U, Bektaş A (September 1, 2025) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42 3 242–246.
IEEE
[1]O. Kucukdemırcı, U. Avcıoğlu, and A. Bektaş, “Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 242–246, Sept. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL
ISNAD
Kucukdemırcı, Omer - Avcıoğlu, Ufuk - Bektaş, Ahmet. “Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage and Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Patients With Walled-off Necrosis”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42/3 (September 1, 2025): 242-246. https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL.
JAMA
1.Kucukdemırcı O, Avcıoğlu U, Bektaş A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2025;42:242–246.
MLA
Kucukdemırcı, Omer, et al. “Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Transluminal Drainage and Direct Endoscopic Necrosectomy in Patients With Walled-off Necrosis”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 42, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 242-6, https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL.
Vancouver
1.Omer Kucukdemırcı, Ufuk Avcıoğlu, Ahmet Bektaş. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage and direct endoscopic necrosectomy in patients with walled-off necrosis. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 1;42(3):242-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA26XS78YL