Entübasyonda Videolaringoskopi

Abstract

Video teknolojisi ve fiberoptik sistemlerdeki son gelişmeler videolaringoskoplar gibi yeni entübasyon araçlarının ve teknolojilerinin gelişmesiyle sonuçlanmıştır. Videolaringoskoplar, blade’inin uç kısmına yerleştirilmiş bir optik sistem aracılığıyla indirekt bir görüşe izin verdiği için entübasyon ve laringoskopide farklı bir yaklaşım olarak kabul edilirler. Bu çalışmanın amacı konvansiyonel direkt laringoskopi ile entübasyonu güç ya da olanaksız olan hastalarda videolaringoskopinin klinik kullanımdaki rolünü tanımlamak için son yıllarda basılan materyalleri derlemektir. Yazarlar yeni laringoskoplar ve videolaringoskoplar gibi cihazlar ile farklı ve zor koşullar altında uygulanan direkt ve indirekt laringoskopileri karşılaştırmışlardır. Sonuçlar, gerçek zor entübasyon olgularının az olması ve seçilen hasta popülasyonunun yüksek heterojenitesinden dolayı toplanan verilerin çoğunun yetersiz olduğunu göstermiştir. Diğer taraftan entübasyon başarısından çok görüntüyü değerlendirmenin yeni cihazların sonuçlarıyla ilgili şüphelere neden olacağı açıktır. Yeni laringoskopun ya da videolaringoskopun primer rolü konvansiyonel yöntemlerle zor hatta olanaksız olan entübasyonda daha iyi bir performans elde etmek olmalıdır. Bu cihazların klinik rolü zor hava yolu çalışmaları ile desteklenmeyi beklemektedir.

Keywords

• Hava yolu cihazı
• Fiberoptik teknoloji
• Zor hava yolu
• Entübasyon
• Laringoskop
• Laringoskopi

References

1. Armstrong, J., John, J., Karsli, C., 2010. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric with difficult airways - a pilot study. Anaesth. 65, 353-357.
2. Barak, M., Philipchuck, P., Abecassis, P., Katz, Y., 2007. A comparison of the Truview® blade with the Macintosh blade in adult patients. Anaesth. 62, 827-831.
3. Bensghir, M., Alaoui, H., Azendour, H., Drissi, M., Elwali, A., Meziane, M., Lalaoui, J.S., Akhaddar, A., Kamili, N.D., 2010 Faster double- lu- men tube intubation with the videolaryngoscope than with a standard laryngoscope. Can J. Anaesth. 57, 980-984.
4. Burkle, C.M., Zepeda, F.A., Bacon, D.R., Rose, SH., 2004. A historical perspective on the use of the laryngoscope as a tool in anaesthesiol ogy. Anesth. 100,1003-1006.
5. Byhahn, C., Iber, T., Zacharowski, K., Schalk, R., Meininger, D., 2010. Tracheal intubation using the mobile C-MAC Video Laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Minerva Anestesiol. 76, 577-583.
6. Cavus, E., Kieckhaefer, J., Doerges, V., Moeller, T., Thee, C., Wagner, K., 2010. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy-guided intubation. Anesth, Analg. 110, 473-477.
7. Cooper, R.M., 2004. Laryngoscopy – its past and future. Can J. Anesth. 51,R1-R5.
8. Cormack, R.S., Lehane, J., 1984. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics anaesthesia.Anaesthesia. 39, 1105-1111.

9. Dhonneur, G., Abdi, W., Ndoko, S.K., Amathieu, R., Risk, N., El Housseini, L., Polliand, C., Champault, G., Combes, X., Tual, L., 2009. Video- assisted versus conventional tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. Obes. Surg. 19,1096-1101
10. Enomoto, T., Asai, T., Arai, T., Kamishima, K., Okuda, Y., 2008. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements Br. J. Anaesth. 100, 544-548.
11. Hackell, R.,. Held, L., Stricker, P., Fladjoe, J.E., 2009. Management of the difficult infant airway with the Storz Video Laryngoscope: a case series. Anesth. Analg. 109,763-766.
12. Hagberg, C.A, Vogt-Harenkamp, C.C, Iannucci, D.G., 2007. Successful airway management of a patient with a known difficult airway with the Direct Coupler Interface Video Laryngoscope. J. Clin. Anesth. 19, 629-631.
13. Iacovidou, N., Bassiakou, E., Stroumpoulis, K., Koudouna, E., Aroni, F., Papalois, A., Xanthos, T., 2010. Conventional Direct Laryngoscopy versus Videolaryngoscopy with the GlideScope®: A Neonatal Manikin Study with Inexperienced Intubators. Am. J. Perinatol. Sep 8. [Epub ahead of print]
14. Jacob, A.K., Kopp, S.L., Bacon, D.R., Smith, H.M., 2009. The History of Anesthesia. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, editors. Clin. Anesth. 6th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 3-26.
15. Jephcott, A., 1984. The Macintosh laryngoscope. A historical note on its clinical and commercial development. Anaesthesia. 39, 474-479.
16. Jones, P.M., Armstrong, P.M., Cherry, R.A., Harle, C.C., Hoogstra, J., 2008. A comparison of GlideScope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngos- copy for nasotracheal intubation Anesth. Analg. 107, 144-148.
17. Kaplan, M.B., Ward, D.S., Berci, G., 2002. A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. J. Clin. Anesth. 14, 620-626.
18. Kaplan, M.B., Ward, D., Hagberg, C.A., Berci, G., Hagiike, M., 2006. Seeing is believing: the importance of video laryngoscopy in teaching and in managing the difficult airway. Surg. Endosc. 20,479-483.
19. Kaplan, M.B, Ward, D., Berc,i G., 2002. Video techniques in thoracic anesthesia. Surg. Anesth. 21, 204-210.
20. Keaveny, J.P., Knell, P.J., 1988. Intubation under induction doses of propofol. Anaesthesia. 43, 80-81.
21. Levitan, R.M., Ochroch, E.A., Kush, S., Shofer, F.S., Hollander, J.E. 1998. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the Percentage Of Glottic Opening (POGO) Scale. Acad. Emerg. Med. 5, 919-923.
22. Maassen, R., Lee, R., Van Zundert, A., Cooper R., 2009. The videolaryngoscope is less traumatic than the classic laryngoscope for a difficult airway in an obese patient. J. Anesth. 23, 445-448.
23. Macintosh, R.R., 1943. A new laryngoscope. Lancet. 241, 205.
24. Macnair, D., Baraclough, D., Wilson, G., Bloch, M., Engelhardt, T., 2009. Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy. Paediatr. Anaesth. 19, 577-580.
25. Malik, M.A., Maharaj, C.H., Harte, B.H., Laffey, J.G., 2008. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO’, GlideScope and Airwayscope laryngo- scope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br. J. Anaesth. 101, 723-730.
26. Mallick, A., Klein, H., Moss, E., 1996. Prevention of cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation. Br. J. Anaesth. 77, 296-297.
27. Maruyama, K.,Yamada. T., Kawakami, R., Hara, K., 2008. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br. J. Anaesth. 101, 563-567.
28. Merli, G., 2010. Videolaryngoscopy: is it only a change of view? Minerva Anestesiol. 76, 569-571.
29. Miceli, L., Cecconi, M., Tripi, G., Zauli, M., Della, Rocca, G., 2008. Evaluation of new laryngoscope blade for tracheal intubation, Truview EVO2: a manikin study Eur. J. Anaesth. 25, 446-449
30. Mihai, R., Blair, E., Kay, H., Cook, TM., 2008. A quantitative review and meta-analysis of performance of non-standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibreoptic intubation aids. Anaesth. 63, 745-760.
31. Narang, A.T., Oldeg, P.F., Medzon, R., Mahmood, A.R., Spector, J.A., Robinett, D.A., 2009. Comparison of intubation success of video laryn- goscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation. Simul. Healthc. 4, 160-165.
32. Nishikawa, K., Matsuoka, H., Saito, S., 2009. Tracheal intubation with the Pentax-AWS reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. J. Neurosurg. Anesth. 21, 292-296.
33. Merli, G., Guarino, A., Della Rocca, G., Frova, G., Petrini, F., Sorbello, M., Coccia, C., 2005. Recommendations for airway control and dif f i - cult airway management. Minerva Anestesiol. 71, 617-657.
34. Rodriguez-Nunez, A., Oulego-Erroz, I., Perez-Gay, L., Cortinas-Diaz, J., 2010. Comparison of the GlideScope Videolaryngoscope to the stan- dard macintosh for intubation by pediatric residents in simulated child airway scenarios. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 26, 726-729.
35. Shimada, M., Hirabayashi, Y., Seo, N., 2010. [Nasotracheal intubation using GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope by novice laryngoscopists]. Masui. 59, 1318-1320
36. Stone, D.J., Gal, T.J., 2000. Airway Management. In Miller RD ed. Anesthesia. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone NewYork, 39, 1444-1445.
37. Stroumpoulis, K., Pagoulatou, A., Violari, M., Ikonomou, I., 2009. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur. J. Anaesth. 26, 218-222.
38. Sun, D.A., Warriner, C.B., Parsons, D.G., Klein, R., Umedaly, H.S., Moult, M., 2005. The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br. J. Anaesth. 94, 381-384.
39. Van Zundert, A., Maassen, R., Lee, R., Willems, R., Timmerman, M., Siemonsma, M., Buise, M., Wiepking, M., 2009. A Macintosh laryngo- scope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth. Analg. 109, 825-831.
40. Vlatten, A., Aucoin, S., Litz, S., Macmanus, B., Soder, C., 2009. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngos- copy for intubation in the Pediatric airway--a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr. Anaesth. 19, 1102-1107.
41. Xue, FS, Zhang, GH, Li, XY, Sun, HT, Li, P, Li, CW, Liu, KP., 2007. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J. Clin. Anesth.19, 245-250.
42. Yentis, S.M., Lee, D.J.H., 1998. Evaluation of an improved scoring System for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 53, 1041-1044.