A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection

Volume: 33 Number: 4 July 3, 2017
EN

A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection

Abstract

Self mutilation poses a stigmatizing concern for a repentant patient and yield to social eschewing. Many of them undergo surgery for treatment of such scars. In this report, we present a case in whom we elected a self mutilation scar bearing dorsal surface of the forearm as a flap donor site for resurfacing a defect on the back of the first web space. Patient had been referred hand injury by shotgun.  While that particular flap (posterior interosseous flap) is not our first choice in such cases, in the face of this preexisting condition we stepped out of our comfort zone for the sake of treating both conditions in one sitting. We think that if a patient with stigmatizing scars presents in need of surgical reconstruction, scarred sites should be chosen as donor sites whenever possible. Therefore, when the hand defects reconstructed, simultaneously, an acceptable single longitudinal scar can be leaved on the forearm instead unpleasant transvers scars.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Publication Date

July 3, 2017

Submission Date

April 1, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 33 Number: 4

APA
Aksakal, İ. A., Sımsek, T., Engın, M. S., & Guneren, E. (2017). A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 33(4). https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR
AMA
1.Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2017;33(4). https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR
Chicago
Aksakal, İbrahim Alper, Tekin Sımsek, Murat Sinan Engın, and Ethem Guneren. 2017. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 33 (4). https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR.
EndNote
Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E (July 1, 2017) A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 33 4
IEEE
[1]İ. A. Aksakal, T. Sımsek, M. S. Engın, and E. Guneren, “A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 33, no. 4, July 2017, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR
ISNAD
Aksakal, İbrahim Alper - Sımsek, Tekin - Engın, Murat Sinan - Guneren, Ethem. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 33/4 (July 1, 2017). https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR.
JAMA
1.Aksakal İA, Sımsek T, Engın MS, Guneren E. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2017;33. Available at https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR.
MLA
Aksakal, İbrahim Alper, et al. “A Social Stigma As a Favorable Reconstructive Option: Implications on Donor Site Selection”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 33, no. 4, July 2017, https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Alper Aksakal, Tekin Sımsek, Murat Sinan Engın, Ethem Guneren. A social stigma as a favorable reconstructive option: Implications on donor site selection. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2017 Jul. 1;33(4). Available from: https://izlik.org/JA65XW37ZR