Accuracy And Efficiency Of Digital Implant Planning And Guided Implant Surgery

Abstract

Advances in digital technologies offer 3D integrated solutions for digital implnat planning.Virtual implant placement and guided implant surgery are claimed to provide more predictable results even in complicated implant treatments.Technology is now capable to properly transfer the virtually planned optimal positon of implants to reality during surgery.However clinicians have to be aware of the potential deviation factors and risks of the different types of guided surgery systems to reduce the risk of complications.The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of different computer-assisted dental implant placement techniques and to discuss potential error sources for each technique.

Keywords

• Guided dental implant surgery,,digital implant planning,computer-assisted implant surgery,accuracy

References

1. Reference1 Arisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Sep;21(9):980-8.
2. Reference2 Aydemir CA, Arısan V Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):255-263.. Epub 2019 Dec 29.
3. Reference3 Becker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L (2005) Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7(Suppl 1):S21–S27
4. Reference4 Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, Sheikh A. Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;75(7):1377-1386.
5. Reference5 Serhal C, Jacobs R, Persoons M, Hermans R, van Steenberghe D. The accuracy of spiral tomography to assess bone quantity for the preoperative planning of implants in the posterior maxilla Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Jun;11(3):242-7.
6. Reference6 Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image- guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Aug;16(4):495-501
7. Reference7 Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
8. Reference8 Campelo, L.D. & Camara, J.R. (2002) Flapless implant surgery: a 10-year clinical retrospective analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 17: 271–276.

9. Reference9 Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M, Bellardini M, Brandetti G, Piccoli L. Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Mar 23. pii: S0901-5027(20)30095-3.
10. Reference10 Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Stefanelli LV, Barbato E. How does an error in positioning the template affect the accuracy of implants inserted using a single fixed mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014a Jan;43(1):85-92.
11. Reference11 Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Stefanelli LV. Accuracy of positioning of implants inserted using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014b;29:1071-8.
12. Reference12 M. Cassetta, G. Pompa, S. Di Carlo, L. Piccoli, A. Pacifici, L. Pacifici The influence of smoking and surgical technique on the accuracy of mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide in complete edentulous upper jaws Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2012 Vol. 16 - N. 11 1546-1553
13. Reference13 Cassetta M, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S, Barbato E. Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Jun;15(3):448-59
14. Reference14 Chen CK, Yuh DY, Huang RY, Fu E, Tsai CF, Chiang CY. Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Navigation System, a Laboratory Guide, and Freehand Drilling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1213-1218.
15. Reference15 Dalal, N.; Ammoun, R.; Abdulmajeed, A.A.; Deeb, G.R.; Bencharit, S. Intaglio surface dimension and guide tube deviations of implant surgical guides influenced by printing layer thickness and angulation setting. J. Prosthodont. 2020, 29, 161–165
16. Reference16 D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133.
17. Reference17 D’haese, J., Van De Velde, T., Elaut, L., & De Bruyn, H. (2012). A pro- spective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolitho- graphic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxilla. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 14(2), 293–303.
18. Reference18 Divakar, T.K., Gidean Arularasan, S., Baskaran, M. et al. Clinical Evaluation of Placement of Implant by Flapless Technique Over Conventional Flap Technique. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 74–84 (2020)
19. Reference19 Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Buser D. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):80-9.
20. Reference20 Dyer PV, Patel N, Pell GM, Cummins B, Sandeman DR. The ISG viewing wand: an application to atlanto-axial cervical surgery using the Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Dec;33(6):370-4.
21. Reference21 Kholy K, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, Faerber K, Buser R, Buser D. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Nov;30(11):1067-1075.
22. Reference22 Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K, Gibbs JD. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Placement-Model-Based Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2016 Oct;42(5):399-405. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
23. Reference23 Farley NE, Kennedy K, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):563-72
24. Reference24 D. Flapless dental implant placement. Oral Implantol. 2007;33(2):75-83.
25. Reference25 Fortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an image-guided system.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Mar-Apr;21(2):298-304.
26. Reference26 Fortin T, Isidori M, Blanchet E, Perriat M, Bouchet H, Coudert JL. An image-guided system-drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: a clinical report on immediate loading. Implant Dent Relat Res. 2004;6(2):111-9.
27. Reference27 Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):602-612.
28. Reference28 Geng W, Liu C, Su Y, Li J, Zhou Y. Accuracy of different types of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing surgical guides for dental implant placement.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jun 15;8(6):8442-9
29. Reference29 Greenberg AM. Digital technologies for dental implant treatment planning and guided surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2015 May;27(2):319-40.
30. Reference30 Guzmán A, Riad Deglow E, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Agustín-Panadero R, Hernández Montero S. Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study. Clin Med. 2019 Dec 2;8(12)
31. Reference31 Hoffmann J, Westendorff C, Gomez-Roman G, Reinert S. Accuracy of navigation-guided socket drilling before implant installation compared to the conventional free-hand method in a synthetic edentulous lower jaw model. Oral Implants Res. 2005 Oct;16(5):609-14.
32. Reference32 Hultin M, Svensson KG, Trulsson M. Clinical advantages of computer-guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:124-35.
33. Reference33 Jesch P, Jesch W, Bruckmoser E, Krebs M, Kladek T, Seemann R. An up to 17-year follow-up retrospective analysis of a minimally invasive, flapless approach: 18 945 implants in 7783 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018; 20: 393-402
34. Reference34 Jorba-García A, Figueiredo R, González-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1;24(1):e76-e83.
35. Reference35 Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, Wismeijer D, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Tahmaseb A. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:92-109.
36. Reference36 Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radio- graphic imaging. J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jun;89(6):611-5.
37. Reference37 Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G, Rosahl S. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Feb;16(1):60-8.
38. Reference38 Kühl S, Zürcher S, Mahid T, Müller-Gerbl M, Filippi A, Cattin P. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):763-9.
39. Reference39 Lopes A, de Araújo Nobre M, Santos D. The Workflow of a New Dynamic Navigation System for the Insertion of Dental Implants in the Rehabilitation of Edentulous Jaws: Report of Two Cases. J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 4;9(2).
40. Reference40 Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Accuracy and precision of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography Accuitomo tomograms obtained with different reconstruction techniques. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Sep;38(6):379-86.
41. Reference41 Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A. Three-Year Outcome of Fixed Partial Rehabilitations Supported by Implants Inserted with Flap or Flapless Surgical Techniques. J Prosthodont 2016; 25: 357-363
42. Reference42 Marlière DAA, Demètrio MS, Picinini LS, Oliveira RG, Netto HDMC. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):153-160.
43. Reference43 Misch K, Wang HL. Implant surgery complications: Etiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008;17:159–168
44. Reference44 Panchal N, Mahmood L, Retana A, Emery R 3rd3. Dynamic Navigation for Dental Implant Surgery.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Nov;31(4):539-547.
45. Reference45 Pellegrino G, Bellini P, Cavallini PF, Ferri A, Zacchino A, Taraschi V, Marchetti C, Consolo U. Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6)
46. Reference46 Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:97-113.
47. Reference47 Pozzi A, Polizzi G, Moy PK. Guided surgery with tooth-supported templates for single missing teeth: A critical review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2016;9(suppl 1):135–153
48. Reference48 Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: A Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac 22. Implants 2017
49. Reference49 Reddy MS, Mayfield-Donahoo T, Vanderven FJ, Jeffcoat MK. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography for placement of root form dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:229-38.
50. Reference50 Rosenfeld, A.L., Mandelaris, G.A. & Tardieu, P.B. (2006) Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise place- ment and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative account- ability. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26: 215–221.
51. Reference51 Sadid-Zadeh R, Kutkut A, Kim H. Prosthetic failure in implant dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):195-214.
52. Reference52 Sato, F.R., Asprino, L., de Araujo, D.E. & de Moraes, M. (2009) Short-term outcome of postoperative patient recovery perception after surgical removal of third molars. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67: 1083–1091.
53. Reference53 Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Mar 31;9(1):e1.
54. Reference54 Schelbert T, Gander T, Blumer M, Jung R, Rücker M, Rostetter C. Accuracy of Computer-Guided Template-Based Implant Surgery: A Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Follow-Up Study. Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):556-563.
55. Reference55 Schrott, A.R., Jimenez, M., Hwang, J.W., Fiorellini, J. & Weber, H.P. (2009) Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-im- plant soft-tissue health and stability around im- plants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20: 1170–1177.
56. Reference56 Schubert O, Schweiger J, Stimmelmayr M, Nold E1, Güth JF. Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.Br Dent J. 2019 Jan 25;226(2):101-108.
57. Reference57 Schnutenhaus, S., Edelmann, C., Rudolph, H., & Luthardt, R. G. (2016). Retrospective study to determine the accuracy of template-guided implant placement using a novel non radiologic evaluation method. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, 121(4), e72–e79.
58. Reference58 Somogyi-Ganss E, Holmes HI, Jokstad A Accuracy of a novel prototype dynamic computer-assisted surgery system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug;26(8):882-890.
59. Reference59 Sun TM, Lan TH, Pan CY, Lee HE. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future.Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-64
60. Reference60 Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):205–213. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
61. Reference61 Stumpel LJ. Deformation of stereolithographically produced surgical guides: an observational case series report.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):442-53.
62. Reference62 Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Derksen W. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 Suppl:25-42.
63. Reference63 Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:416-435
64. Reference64 Tarnow, D.P., Magner, A.W. & Fletcher, P. (1992) The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. Journal of Periodontology 63: 995–996.
65. Reference65 Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Feb;67(2):394-401
66. Reference66 Widmann G, Bale JR. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery—A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:305–313
67. Reference67 Witherington T, Cheung A, Nagy L, Brewer L. Enhanced Implant Case Planning Using Dual Scan CBCT of an Existing Prosthesis: Report of a Case. J Oral Implantol. 2017 Oct;43(5):381-386.
68. Reference68 Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: A clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24: 234–242.
69. Reference69 Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:112-23
70. Reference70 Vasak C, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Strbac G, Schemper M, Zechner W. Computed tomography-based evaluation of template (NobelGuide™)-guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Oct;22(10):1157-1163.
71. Reference71 Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Computer-supported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:69-76.
72. Reference72 Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications.Periodontol 2000. 2014a Oct;66(1):214-27
73. Reference73 Vercruyssen M, Hultin M, Van Assche N, Svensson K, Naert I, Quirynen M. Guided surgery: accuracy and efficiency. Periodontol 2000. 2014b Oct;66(1):228-46.
74. Reference74 Vercruyssen M, De Laat A, Coucke W, Quirynen M. An RCT comparing patient-centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement. J Clin Periodontol. 2014c Jul;41(7):724-32.
75. Reference75 Verde MA, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis. .J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Mar;69(3):276-80.
76. Reference76 https://x-navtech.com