Assessment of the correlation between bone density and implant stability

Year 2013, Volume: 30 Issue: 3, 237 - 240, 05.11.2013

A.Pinar Sumer , Murat Danacı N.Tuba Telcioğlu Elif O. Sandıkcı Mahmut Sumer , Ahmet U. Guler

https://doi.org/10.5835/jecm.omu.30.03.006

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the correlation between bone density and implant stability, using computed tomography (CT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). We examined a total of 97 implants in 12 patients. CT was used to determine the bone density at each implant recipient site in Hounsfield units (HU). After implant placement, RFA measurements were immediately performed with an Osstell instrument, and RFA values were recorded as implant stability quotients (ISQ). Bone density values ranged from 328 to 1184 HU. ISQ ranged from 48 to 80. The mean bone densities and RFA values of all 97 implants were 689.61±173.76 HU and 66.08±6.81 ISQ, respectively. A positive correlation between RFA values and bone density was found for all four regions, with the posterior maxilla yielding a correlation of r=0.603, posterior mandible r=0.622, anterior mandible r=0.834, and anterior maxilla r=0.838. Our data confirm the correlation between ISQ and bone density.

Keywords

Bone density, Computed tomography, Implant, Primary stability

References

• Aksoy, U., Eratalay, K., Tözüm, T.F., 2009. The possible association among bone density values, resonance frequency measurements, tactile sense, and histomorphometric evaluations of dental implant osteotomy sites: A preliminary study. Implant. Dent. 18, 316-325.
• Ekfeldt, A., Christiansson, U., Eriksson, T., Linden, U., Lundqvist, S., Rundcrantz, T., Johansson, L.A., Nilnar, K., Billström, C., 2001. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12, 462-467.
• Friberg, B., Jemt, T., Lekholm, U., 1991. Early failures in 4. 641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 6, 142-146.
• Hatcher D.C., Dial C., Mayorga C., 2003. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 31, 825-833.
• Hutton, J.E., Health, M.R., Chai, J.Y., Harnett, J., Jemt, T., Johns, R.B., McKenna, S., McNamara, D.C., van Steenberghe, D., Taylor, R., Watson, R.M., Herrmann, I., 1995. 1995. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3 year follow up in a multicenter study of Branemark implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 10, 33-42.
• Kaptein, M.L.A., De Lange, G.L., Blijdorp, P.A., 1999. Peri-implant tissue health in reconstructed atrophic maxillae- report of 88 patients and 470 implants. J. Oral Rehabil. 26, 464-474.
• Meredith, N., Book, K.,, Friberg, B., Jemt, T., Sennerby, L., 1997. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 8, 226-233.
• Meredith, N., 1998. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int. J. Prosthodont. 11, 491-501.
• Norton, M.R., Gamble, C., 2001. Bone classification: An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 12, 79-84.
• Oh, J.S., Kim, S.G., Lim, S.C., Ong, J.L., 2009. A comparative study of two noninvasive techniques to evaluate implant stability: Periotest and osstell mentor. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 107, 513-518.
• Ormianer, Z., Feuerstein, O., Assad, R., Samet, N., Weiss, EI., 2009. In vivo changes in dental implant temperatures during hot beverage intake: A pilot study. Implant Dent.18, 38-45.
• Salimov F., Tatli U., Kürkçü M., Akoglan M., Oztunç H., Kurtoglu C., 2013. Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values