Effects of different local haemostatic agents on facial swelling after the third molar surgery

Year 2015, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 7 - 11, 24.04.2015

İsmail Şener , Murat Metin Cihan Bereket Mustafa Tekce Selim Arıcı , Alper Alkan

Abstract

It was aimed to investigate the effects of three different local haemostatic agents (oxidized regenerated cellulose, gelatin sponge and collagen sponge) on the facial swelling after surgical removal of impacted the third mandibular molar teeth, in this study. Sixty-six healthy patients (mean age, 21.21±3.14 years) requiring bilateral impacted third molar extractions were included in this double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study. All teeth were removed bilaterally in the same operation by one surgeon. The left side of the mandible served as the test side for local haemostasis and the right side as the controlside in all patients. After removal, the primary closure of surgical wound was provided with silk sutures, in the control side. One of the absorbable haemostatic agents, oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), gelatin sponge (GS) and collagen sponge (CS) was placed in the extraction cavities following gauze packing for 5 minutes to prevent bleeding and after that the wound was sutured. Data was collected regarding the operating time, mouth opening, and facial swelling. Facial swelling was measured by “point counting technique” on standard posteroanterior skull radiographs. The comparisons of differences belonging to ORC, GS and CS applications on preoperative and postoperative edema showed that the differences were not statistically significant according to analysis ofvariance (ANOVA) (p>0.05). This study has shown that the haemostatic local agents do not have any significant effect in the facial edema. 

Keywords

Gelatin sponge, Facial swelling, Local haemostatic agents, Oxidized regenerated cellulose, Point counting technique, Third molar surgery

References

• Absi, E.G., Shepherd, J.P., 1993. A comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methods. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 22, 149-153. doi:10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80240-1.
• Alkan, A., Metin, M., Arici, S., Sener, I., 2004. A prospective randomised cross-over study of the effect of local haemostasis after third molar surgery on facial swelling: an exploratory trial. Br. Dent. J. 197, 42-44. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4811421.
• Amin, M.M., Laskin, D.M., 1983. Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molars. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 55, 448-451.
• Aras, M.H., Güngörmüs, M., 2010. Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of the effect two different low-level laser therapies (LLLT)-- intraoral and extraoral on trismus and facial swelling following surgical extraction of the lower third molar. Lasers. Med. Sci. 25, 641-645. 10.1007/s10103-009-0684-1.
• Arteagoitia, I., Diez, A., Barbier, L., Santamaría, G., Santamaría, J., 2005. Efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in preventing infectious and inflammatory complications following impacted mandibular third molar extraction. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 100, 11-18. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.03.025.
• Brabander, E.C., Cattaneo, G., 1988. The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 17, 119-121.
• Danda, A.K., Krishna, Tatiparthi, M., Narayanan, V., Siddareddi A., 2010. Influence of primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after impacted mandibular third molar removal on postoperative pain and swelling a comparative and split mouth study. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 68, 309-312. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.060.
• Dubois, D.D., Pizer, M.E., Chinnis, R.J., 1982. Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 40, 631-634. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(82)90111-2.
• Esen, E., Taşar, F., Akhan, O., 1999. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg, 57, 1201-1206. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90486-X.
• Forsgren, H., Heimdahl, A., Johansson, B., Krekmanov, L., 1985. Effect of application of cold dressings on the postoperative course in oral surgery. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 14, 223-228.
• Gallardo, F., Carstens, M., Ayarza, M., 1990. Analgesic and antiinflammatory effects of glucamethacin (a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic) after the removal of impacted third molars. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 69, 157-160.
• Gersema, L., Baker, K., 1992. Use of corticosteroids in oral surgery. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 50, 270-277. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(92)90325-T
• Jackson, D.L., Moore, P.A., Hargreaves, K.M., 1989. Preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication for the prevention of postoperative dental pain. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 119, 641-647.
• Jackson, D.L., 1999. Determination of the anti-inflammatory effects of methylprednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery (discussion). J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 57, 1206-1208. doi:10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90486-X.
• Kaczmarzyk, T., Wichlinski, J., Stypulkowska, J., Zaleska, M., Panas, M, Woron, J., 2007. Single-dose and multi-dose clindamycin therapy fails to demonstrate efficacy in preventing infectious and inflammatory complications in third molar surgery. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 36, 417-422. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.12.003.
• Krekmanov, L., Nordenram, A., 1986. Postoperative complications after surgical removal of mandibular third molars. Effects of penicillin V and chlorhexidine. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 15, 25-29.
• Lewelyn, J., Ryan, M., Santosh, C., 1996. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to assess swelling after the removal of third molar teeth. Br. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 34, 419-423.
• Milles, M., Desjardins, P.J., Pawel, H.E., 1985. The facial plethysmograph: a new instrument to measure facial swelling volumetrically. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 43, 346-352. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(85)90255-1.
• Milles, M., Desjardins, P.J., 1993. Reduction of postoperative facial swelling by low-dose methylprednisolone: an experimental study. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 51, 987-991.
• Monaco, G., Staffolani, C., Gatto, M.R., Checchi, L., 1999. Antibiotic therapy in impacted third molar surgery. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 107, 437-441.
• Pedersen, A., Maersk-Moller, O., 1985. Volumetric determination of extraoral swelling from stereophotographs. A method study in the buccal area. Int. J. Oral. Surg. 14, 229-234.
• Poeschl, P.W., Eckel, D., Poeschl, E., 2004. Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic treatment in third molar surgery--a necessity? J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 62, 3-8. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2003.05.004.
• Rakprasitkul, S., Pairuchvej, V., 1997. Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 26, 187-190.
• Rasse, M., Forkert, G., Waldhausl P., 1991. Stereophotogrammetry of facial soft tissue. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 20, 163-166.
• Roynesdal, A.K., Bjornland, T., Barkvoll, P., Haanaes, H.R., 1993. The effect of soft-laser application on postoperative pain and swelling. A double-blind, crossover study. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 22, 242-245.
• Schultze-Mosgau, S., Schmelzeisen, R., Frolich, J.C., Schmele, H., 1995. Use of ibuprofen and methylprednisolone for the prevention of pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 53, 2-7. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(95)90486-7.
• Senghore, N., Harris, M., 1999. The effect of tranexamic acid (cyclokapron) on blood loss after third molar extraction under a day case general anaesthetic. Br. Dent. J. 186, 634-636.
• Shuttee, T.S., 1962. Hyaluronidase in relief of postoperative trismus, swelling, and pain. Separate injection in 150 oral surgical procedures. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 15, 115-120.
• Sisk, A.L., Hammer, W.B., Shelton, D.W., Joy, E.D., 1986. Complications following removal of impacted third molars: the role of the experience of the surgeon. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 44, 855-859. doi:10.1016/0278-2391(86)90221-1.
• Stathopoulos, P., Mezitis, M., Kappatos, C., Titsinides, S., Stylogianni, E., 2011. Cysts and tumors associated with impacted third molars: is prophylactic removal justified? J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 69, 405-408. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.025.
• Szmyd, L., 1956. A clinical evaluation of an antihistaminic preparation in oral surgery. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. 9, 928-931.