Direct Digitalization Devices in Today’s Dental Practice: Lab Scanners

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 3s, 143 - 147, 09.05.2021

Çağrı Ural Necati Kaleli

Öz

Every day, modern dentistry faces with new technologies, which have begun to be used in daily clinical practice, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing has brought new technologies and opportunities to all fields of dentistry. The first step is acquiring the true data, which belongs to the patients, digitalization of intraoral structures. By acquiring these data, the restorations can be designed and fabricated by using digital workflow.
Dentists have two main options for capturing the data from the related surfaces; one is the direct digitalization and the other one is the indirect digitalization process. In the indirect process, extraoral scanners, which are called lab scanners or cast scanners, are used. Every system has different advantages and disadvantages, and the clinicians or dental technicians should know the technology and different features of these devices to choose the optimal device for their workflow.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Digital Dentistry, Extraoral, Scanners, Digital, Workflow

Kaynakça

• Al-Fadda, S.A., Zarb, G.A., Finer, Y., 2007. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Int. J. Prosthodont. 20, 125-131.
• Arnetzl, G., Pongratz, D., 2005. Milling precision and fitting accuracy of Cerec Scan milled restorations. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 8, 273-281.
• Chan, D., Chung, A.H., Haines, J., Yau, E.T., Kuo, C., 2011. The accuracy of optical scanning: influence of convergence and die preparation. Oper. Dent. 36, 486-491.
• De Villaumbrosia, P.G., Martínez-Rus, F., García-Orejas, A., Salido, M.P., Pradíes, G., 2016. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J. Prosthet. Dent 116, 543-550. e541.
• Del Corso, M., Aba, G., Vazquez, L., Dargaud, J., Ehrenfest, D.M.D., 2009. Optical three‐dimensional scanning acquisition of the position of osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res. 11, 214-221.
• Delong, R., Heinzen, M., Hodges, J.S., Ko, C.C., Douglas, W., 2003. Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J. Dent. Res. 82, 438-442.
• Ebert, J., Özkol, E., Zeichner, A., Uibel, K., Weiss, Ö., Koops, U., Telle, R., Fischer, H., 2009. Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia. J. Dent. Res. 88, 673-676.
• Fielding, G.A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S., 2012. Effects of silica and zinc oxide doping on mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed tricalcium phosphate tissue engineering scaffolds. Dent. Mater. 28, 113-122.
• Jeon, J.H., Choi, B.Y., Kim, C.M., Kim, J.H., Kim, H.Y., Kim, W.C., 2015. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white-and blue-light scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 114, 549-553. Jeon, J.H., Lee, K.T., Kim, H.Y., Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., 2013. White light scanner-based repeatability of 3-dimensional digitizing of silicon rubber abutment teeth impressions. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 5, 452-456.
• Joós-Kovács, G., Vecsei, B., Körmendi, S., Gyarmathy, V., Borbély, J., Hermann, P., 2019. Trueness of CAD/CAM digitization with a desktop scanner–an in vitro study. BMC. Oral. Health. 19, 280.
• Kachalia, P.R., Geissberger, M.J., 2010. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J. Calif. Dent. Assoc. 38, 323-330. Lee, J.J., Jeong, I.D., Park, J.Y., Jeon, J.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, W.C., 2017. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners. J. Prosthet. Dent. 117, 253-259.
• May, K.B., Russell, M.M., Razzoog, M.E., Lang, B.R., 1998. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J. Prosthet. Dent. 80, 394-404. Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., Tamaki, Y., 2009. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent. Mater. J. 28, 44-56.
• Persson, A., Andersson, M., Oden, A., Sandborgh-Englund, G., 2006. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J. Prosthet. Dent. 95, 194-200.
• Persson, A.S., Andersson, M., Odén, A., Sandborgh-Englund, G., 2008. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent. Mater. 24, 1123-1130.
• Prasad, R., Abdullah Al-Kheraif, A., 2013. Three-dimensional accuracy of CAD/CAM titanium and ceramic superstructures for implant abutments using spiral scan microtomography. Int. J. Prosthodont. 26, 451-457.
• Quaas, S., Rudolph, H., Luthardt, R.G., 2007. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J. Dent. 35, 903-908.
• Rudolph, H., Luthardt, R.G., Walter, M.H., 2007. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput. Biol. Med. 37, 579-587.
• Shembesh, M., Ali, A., Finkelman, M., Weber, H.P., Zandparsa, R., 2017. An in vitro comparison of the marginal adaptation accuracy of CAD/CAM restorations using different impression systems. J. Prosthodont. 26, 581-586.
• Strub, J.R., Rekow, E.D., Witkowski, S., 2006. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 137, 1289-1296.
• Tamimi, F., Hirayama, H. 2019, Digital Restorative Dentistry. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
• Tomita, S., Shin-Ya, A., Gomi, H., Shin-Ya, A., Yokoyama, D., 2007. Machining accuracy of crowns by CAD/CAM system using TCP/IP: influence of restorative material and scanning condition. Dent. Mater. J. 26, 549-560.
• Vlaar, S.T., Van Der Zel, J.M., 2006. Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int. Dent. J. 56, 301-309.