Effects of smoking dependence level on attentional bias in smokers

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 41 Sayı: 3, 485 - 490, 30.09.2024

Başak Ünübol , Umut Karagöz

Öz

There is uncertainty regarding whether the degree of nicotine dependence directly impacts the increase or decrease of attentional biases towards smoking-related cues. Their relationship remains unclear. Therefore, we compared the attentional bias among smokers with varying levels of dependence. We conducted the study with 114 smokers, utilizing a Modified Stroop Paradigm and Dot Probe Tasks to assess attentional biases toward both smoking-related and neutral cues. The objective was to compare attention bias levels among individuals with varying degrees of dependence. At various levels of nicotine dependence -whether mild, moderate, or severe- individuals demonstrated a consistent attentional bias towards smoking-related cues, suggesting no significant distinction between these groups. The results of the study show that there was no discernable correlation between attentional bias concerning smoking-related stimuli and the level of nicotine dependency. The results are discussed together with the existing studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Attentional bias, nicotine dependence, addiction, dot probe tasks

Kaynakça

• Stewart J, de Wit H, Eikelboom R. Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev. 1984;91(2):251–68.
• Carter BL, Tiffany ST. Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction. Carfax Publishing Company; 1999;94(3):327–40.
• Niaura RS, Rohsenow DJ, Binkoff JA, Monti PM, Pedraza M, Abrams DB. Relevance of Cue Reactivity to Understanding Alcohol and Smoking Relapse. J Abnorm Psychol. 1988;97(2):133–52.
• Sayette MA, Hufford MR. Effects of Cue Exposure and Deprivation on Cognitive Resources in Smokers. J Abnorm Psychol. 1994;103(4):812–8.
• Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Sep 1;97(1–2):1–20.
• Sayette M. Behaviour Research and Therapy The effects of alcohol on emotion in social drinkers. Behav Res Ther [Internet]. 2017;88:76–89. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.005
• Fadardi JS, Cox WM, Rahmani A. Neuroscience of attentional processes for addiction medicine: From brain mechanisms to practical considerations. In: Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier B.V.; 2016. p. 77–89.
• Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers. Addiction. 2003;98(10):1409–17.
• Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, O’brien CP. Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task. Drug Alcohol Depend [Internet]. 2002;(67):185–91. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/drugalcdep
• Bradley B, Field M, Mogg K, De Houwer J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav Pharmacol. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004;15:29–36.
• Powell J, Dawkins L, West R, Powell J, Pickering A. Relapse to smoking during unaided cessation: Clinical, cognitive and motivational predictors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). Springer Verlag; 2010;212(4):537–49.
• Cox WM, Hogan LM, Kristian MR, Race JH. Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers’ treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend [Internet]. 2002;(68):237–43. Available from: www.elsevier.com/locate/drugalcdep
• Marissen MAE, Franken IHA, Waters AJ, Blanken P, Van Den Brink W, Hendriks VM. Attentional bias predicts heroin relapse following treatment. Addiction. 2006 Sep;101(9):1306–12.
• Carpenter KM, Schreiber E, Church S, McDowell D. Drug Stroop performance: Relationships with primary substance of use and treatment outcome in a drug-dependent outpatient sample. Addict Behav. 2006 Jan;31(1):174–81.
• Rubinstein ML, Luks TL, Moscicki AB, Dryden W, Rait MA, Simpson G V. Smoking-related cue-induced brain activation in adolescent light smokers. J Adolesc Heal [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;48(1):7–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.09.016
• Waters AJ, Feyerabend C. Determinants and Effects of Attentional Bias in Smokers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2000;14(2):111–20.
• Gross TM, Jarvik ME, Rosenblatt MR. Nicotine abstinence produces content-specific Stroop interference. Vol. 110, Psychopharmacology. Springer-Verlag; 1993.
• Mogg K, Bradley BP, Field M, De Houwer J. Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence. 2003.
• Eysenck MW, Macleod C, Mathews A. Cognitive functioning and anxiety. Psychol Res. 1987;49:189–95.
• Macleod C, Mathews A, Tata P. Attentional Bias in Emotional Disorders. Vol. 95, Journal of Abnormal Piychofcgy. 1986.
• Fridrici C, Leichsenring-Driessen C, Driessen M, Wingenfeld K, Kremer G, Beblo T. The individualized alcohol Stroop task: No attentional bias toward personalized stimuli in alcohol-dependents. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):62–70.
• Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN. The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev. 2004;3(4):243–60.
• Sweatt,S.K, Gower, B.A, Chieh, A.Y, Liu, Y, Li L. What is Abnormal About Addiction-Related Attentional Biases. Physiol Behav. 2016;176(1):139–48.
• Stormark KM, Hugdahl K, Ph D. Selective Attention to Alcohol Stimuli : Automated Processing ? J Stud Alcohol. 1998;
• Rosse RB, Johri S, Kendrick K, Hess AL, Alim TN, Miller M, et al. Preattentive and attentive eye movements during visual scanning of a cocaine cue: Correlation with intensity of cocaine cravings. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;9(1):91–3.
• Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev. 1993;18(3):247–91.
• Sharma D, Albery IP, Cook C. Selective attentional bias to alcohol related stimuli in problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers. Addiction. 2001;96(2):285–95.
• Field M, Christiansen P, Cole J, Goudie A. Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction. 2007;102(4):579–86.
• Cox WM, Yeates GN, Regan CM. Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;55(1–2):85–9.
• Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Oct;176(1):88–93.
• Mogg K, Bradley BP. Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: Manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias. J Psychopharmacol. 2002;16(4):385–92.
• Zack M, Belsito L, Scher R, Eissenberg T, Corrigall WA. Effects of abstinence and smoking on information processing in adolescent smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001;153(2):249–57.
• Bradley BP, Mogg K, Wright T, Field M. Attentional bias in drug dependence: Vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2003 Mar;17(1):66–72.
• Mogg K, Field M, Bradley BP. Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: An investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;180(2):333–41.
• Lang PJ, Bradley MM, & Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 2008;2008.
• Bradley BP, Field M, Healy H, Mogg K. Do the affective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers? J Psychopharmacol. 2008 Sep;22(7):737–45.
• Froeliger B, Modlin L, Wang L, Kozink R V., McClernon FJ. Nicotine withdrawal modulates frontal brain function during an affective Stroop task. Psychopharmacology (Berl). Springer Verlag; 2012 Apr 1;220(4):707–18.
• Kisacik E, Çakir Z. The development study of smoking stroop test on a turkish sample. Noropsikiyatri Ars. Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society; 2020;57(3):234–40.
• Frecker RC, Fagerström K. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict [Internet]. 1991;86:1119–27. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/21222875
• Atilla UYSAL M, Kadakal F, Karşidağ Ç, Gülhan BAYRAM N, Uysal Ö, Yilmaz V, et al. Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: Reliability in a Turkish sample and factor analysis #. Vol. 52, Tüberküloz ve Toraks Dergisi. 2004.
• DEMİREZEN DANIŞMAN Mehmet Ali KURÇER ZONGULDAK M. SİGARA İÇME ARZUSU ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLİLİK, GÜVENİLİRLİĞİ VE ANKSİYETE İLE İLİŞKİSİ TIPTA UZMANLIK TEZİ. 2013.
• Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Geçerliği, Güvenirliği. Vol. 7, Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989. p. 3–13.
• Muhterem ULUSOY, ŞAHİN NH. Turkish Version of the Beck Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric Properties. 1998.
• Field M, Duka T, Tyler E, Schoenmakers T. Attentional bias modification in tobacco smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(7):812–22.
• Tiffany ST. A Cognitive Model of Drug Urges and Drug-Use Behavior: Role of Automatic and Nonautomatic Processes. Vol. 97, Psychological Review. 1990.
• Schoenmakers T, Wiers RW, Field M. Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008;197(1):169–78.
• Duka T, Townshend JM. The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;176(3–4):353–61.
• Bruce G, Jones BT. A pictorial Stroop paradigm reveals an alcohol attentional bias in heavier compared to lighter social drinkers. J Psychopharmacol. 2004;18(4):527–33.
• Noël X, Colmant M, Van Der Linden M, Bechara A, Bullens Q, Hanak C, et al. Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: The role of initial orienting. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(11):1871–7.
• Field M, Eastwood B, Bradley BP, Mogg K. Selective processing of cannabis cues in regular cannabis users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;85(1):75–82.
• Bearre L, Sturt P, Bruce G, Jones BT. Heroin-related attentional bias and monthly frequency of heroin use are positively associated in attenders of a harm reduction service. Addict Behav. 2007;32(4):784–92.
• Field M, Mogg K, Bradley BP. Craving and cognitive biases for alcohol cues in social drinkers. Alcohol Alcohol. 2005;40(6):504–10.
• Hogarth LC, Mogg K, Bradley BP, Duka T, Dickinson A. Attentional orienting towards smoking-related stimuli. Behav Pharmacol. 2003;14(2):153–60.
• Waters AJ, Shiffman S, Sayette MA, Paty JA, Gwaltney CJ, Balabanis MH. Attentional bias predicts outcome in smoking cessation. Heal Psychol. 2003 Jul;22(4):378–87.
• Munafò M, Mogg K, Roberts S, Bradley BP, Murphy M. Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task. J Psychopharmacol. 2003;13(3):310–316.
• Choi SW, Chon Y, Bhang S young, Jang YL, Won WY, Choi JT, et al. Nicotine dependence syndrome scale and craving: Comparing nicotine-dependent individuals with and without comorbid alcohol dependence. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry. 2014;6(2):200–6.
• Istvan JA. Are Heavy Smokers Different From Light Smokers? JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1989;261(1):43. Droungas A, Ehrman RN, Childress AR, O’Brien CP. Effect of smoking cues and cigarette availability on craving and smoking behavior. Addict Behav. 1995;20(5):657–73.