Derleme

United Nations and Democracy Promotion: Liberalism under the Guise of a Neutral Rhetoric

Cilt: 10 Sayı: 17 31 Mart 2019
PDF İndir
EN TR

United Nations and Democracy Promotion: Liberalism under the Guise of a Neutral Rhetoric

Abstract

The United Nations (UN) has been one of the prominent actors of global democracy promotion efforts, particularly after the end of the Cold War. The UN refrains from openly espousing a certain model of democracy, hence the adoption of a neutral rhetoric by default. However, the UN’s neutrality towards different models of democracy is merely a thinly veiled attempt to disguise the inherent liberal character of its democracy promotion agenda. In its essence, democracy is an essentially contested concept, nevertheless, following the end of the Cold War, one specific interpretation of democracy, i.e. liberal democracy has reached a hegemonic status, and UN’s democracy promotion agenda has not been spared from this hegemony. Thus, this article’s main intent is to show that hegemonic liberal democracy features heavily within UN’s democracy promotion, which goes against its neutral rhetoric. The UN’s liberal tendency is visible both in UNDP electoral support and in peacebuilding operations which is based on the dual premise of conducting elections along with making target countries’ economies more market-friendly.

Keywords

United Nations,Demcoracy Promotion,Liberal Democracy,Essential Contestability of Democracy

Kaynakça

  1. Alessandri, E., Hassan, O. & Reinert, T. (2006). U.S. democracy promotion from Bush to Obama. EUSPRING Working Paper No 1. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/64170/1/us_dem_promotion_april15.pdf
  2. Alexander, J. & Mohanty, C. T. (1997). Introduction: Genealogies, legacies, movements. J. Alexander & C. T. Mohanty (Ed.) Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures in (pp. xiii-xlii). London & New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Axelrod, R. (2005). Promoting democracy through international organization. E. Zedillo (Ed.) Reforming the United Nations for Peace and Security in (pp. 19-38). New Haven, CT: Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
  4. Ban, K. (2009). Guidance note of the secretary-general on democracy. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/en/pdfs/FINAL%20Guidance%20Note-%20on%20Democracy.pdf
  5. Bouchet, N. (2011). Barack Obama’s democracy promotion at midterm. The International Journal of Human Rights, 15(4), 572-588.
  6. Boutros-Ghali, B. (1996). An agenda for democratization. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Public Information.
  7. Burnell, P. (2000). Democracy assistance: The state of discourse. P. Burnell (Ed.) Democracy Assistance: International Co-operation for Democratization in (pp. 3-33). London & Portland OR: Frank Cass Publishers.
  8. Cevheri, E. (2018). Avrupa Birliği’nin Akdeniz’deki demokrasi teşviki politikaları: Mısır örneği. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
  9. Chesterman, S., Johnstone, I. & Malone, D.M. (2016). Law and practice of the united nations: Documents and commentary (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  10. Clinton, B. (1999). A national security strategy for a new century. Washington, DC: White House. Retrieved from http://nssarchive.us/NSSR/2000.pdf

Kaynak Göster

APA
Cevheri, E. (2019). United Nations and Democracy Promotion: Liberalism under the Guise of a Neutral Rhetoric. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 10(17), 1911-1929. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.499528