The Effect of Financial Depth on Fragile Five Economies

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 39, 657 - 680, 01.07.2021

Ferhat Şirin Sökmen

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.930561

Öz

Improvement in the financial system is important to increase economic growth performance. Because the positive change in the financial system positively affects the investment and consumption decisions ensuring growth. In the meantime, the financial depth that is one of the indicators of financial development measurement is a remarkable index revealing the degree of benefiting from the financial system in terms of developing countries. The entry of both domestic savings and global capital flows into the financial system is crucial to pro-vide the financial depth. This study utilized panel data analysis methods to test the effect of financial depth on economic growth in the light of data of Turkish, South African, Brazilian, Indian, and Indonesian economies that are called fragile five and also well-known with their financial systems’ dependency to external financing for the period between 1980 and 2018. Test results show that it is possible to talk about two-way causality for the country group in the short and long term while there is only a one-way causality from financial depth to Brazilian, Indian, and South African economies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fragile five, Financial depth, Panel data analysis

Finansal Derinliğin Kırılgan Beşli Ekonomileri Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Finansal sistemdeki gelişme ekonomik büyüme performansının artırılması için önemlidir. Zira finansal sistemdeki pozitif değişim büyümeyi sağlayan yatırım ve tüketim kararlarının verilmesini de olumlu bir şekilde etkileyecektir. Bununla birlikte finansal gelişmişliğin ölçümünde kullanılan göstergelerden bir tanesi olan finansal derinlik, gelişmekte olan ülkelerin finansal sistemden ne derece yararlanabildiğini gösteren önemli bir endekstir. Finansal derinliği sağlamak amacı ile gerek yurtiçi tasarrufların gerekse küresel sermaye akımlarının finansal sisteme girişi önem arz etmektedir.Bu çalışmada finansal derinliğin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi “kırılgan beşli” olarak tabir edilen ve finansal sistemlerinin dış finansmana bağımlılıkları ile bilinen Türkiye, Güney Afrika, Brezilya, Hindistan ve Endonezya ekonomilerinde 1980 ve 2018 yılları arasında kalan dönemlere ait veriler ışığında panel veri analiz yöntemleri ile test edilmektedir. Test sonuçları göstermektedir ki, ülke grubunda kısa ve uzun dönemde çift yönlü nedenselliğin varlığından bahsetmek mümkün iken, ülke bazlı analizler sonucunda finansal derinlikten ekonomik büyümeye doğru Brezilya, Hindistan ve Güney Afrika ekonomilerinde tek yönlü bir nedenselliğin bulunduğu söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kırılgan beşli, Finansal derinlik, Panel veri analizi

Kaynakça

• Abu-Bader, S. and Abu-Qarn, A. S. (2006). Financial Development and economic growth nexus: Time series evidence from Middle Eastern and North African Countries. Monaster Center for Economic Research’s Discussion, 06-09.
• Agheli, L. and Hadian, G. (2017). Financial development, commercial development, and economic growth in the selected emerging and the Middle Eastern Countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 362-370.
• Apergis, N., Filippidis, I. and Economidou, C. (2007). Financial deepening and economic growth linkages: A panel data analysis. Review of World Economics, 143(1), 179-198.
• Breusch, T. and Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its application to model specification in econometrics. Rev. Econ. Stud., 47(1), 239–253.
• Calderon, C. (2002). The direction of causality between financial development and economic growth. Central Bank of Chile’s Working Paper No. 184.
• Doğan, T. (2019). 2008 Küresel finans krizinin gelişmekte olan ülkelere etkileri: Teori ve uygulama. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kayseri.
• Eichengreen, B. (1997). Exchange rate stability and financial stability. Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers 233612, University of California-Berkeley, Department of Economics. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.233612
• Emirmahmutoğlu, F. ve Kose, N. (2011). Testing for granger causality in heterogeneous mixed panel. Economic Modelling , 28(3), 870–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.018
• Etibar J., Rodolfo M. and Marco P. (2019). Financial repression is knocking at the door, again. Should we be concerned?, IMF Working Paper.
• Gezer, M.A. (2018). The relationship between financial deepining and economic growth: Bootstrap causality approach for the selected upper middle income countries. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 1(614), 95 – 112.
• Kayhan, S., Bayat, T., Dejan, A. ve Taşar, İ. (2017). The relation between fiscal and current account deficits: The case of fragile five. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 5(3), 318 – 330. Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688-726.
• Lynch, D. (1996). Measuring financial sector development: A study of selected Asia-Pasific countries. The Developing Economies, 34(1), 3-33.
• Mirdala, R. (2011). Financial deepening and economic growth in the european transition economies. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 6(16), 177-194.
• Obstfeld, M.(1994). Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1310-1329.
• Özşahin, Ş. ve Uysal, D. (2017). Financial deepening and economic development in MENA countries: Empirical evidence from the advanced panel method. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(4), 152-162.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Working Paper No:0435, University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
• Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312.
• Pesaran, M.H., Ullah, A. and Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross section independence. Econometrics Journal, 11(1) 105–127.
• Pesaran, M. H. and Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93.
• Pradhan, R.P. (2010). Financial deepening, foreign direct investment and economic growth: Are they Co-integrated? . International Journal of Financial Research, 1(1), 37-43.
• Sahay, R. (2015). Rethinking financial deepening: Stability and growth in emerging markets. IMF Staff Discussion Note.
• Shaw, E.S. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development. New York and London: Oxford University Press, Inc.
• Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a new broad-based index of financial development. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/5.
• Şengül, O. (2020). Financial repression and economic growth: Case of Turkey. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 47(7), 265 – 273.
• Smith, L. V., Leybourne, S., Kim, T. H. and Newbold, P. (2004). More powerful panel data unit root tests with an application to mean reversion in real exchange rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(2), 147-170.
• Yiğitbaş, Ş. B. (2017) The Relationship between Financial Depth and Current account deficit in Turkey. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 13(3), 507-520.
• Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709-748.