Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 46, 217 - 227, 30.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1092792

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abid, M. & Muhammad, I. (2021) Digital social innovation and civic participation: Toward responsible and inclusive transport planning. European Planning Studies, 29, 1870-1885.
  • Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S. & Zimmer, A. (2016). Chapter 25: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in Social Innovation Bransen et. Al. (Eds.). in Social Innovations in the Urban Contex: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (p.303-310). Springer, Cham.
  • Buffel, T., Yarker, S., Phillipson, C., Lang, L., Lewis, C., Doran, P. & Gof, M. (2021). Locked down by inequality: Older people and the COVID-19 pandemic. Special issue article: Urban Public Health Emergencies and The Covid-19 Pandemic. Urban Studies, 00, 1-18.
  • Calzada, I. (2020). Replicating smart cities: The city-to-city learning programme in the replicate EC-H2020-SCC Project. Smart Cities, 3, 978–1003.
  • Calzada, I. (2021). The right to have digital rights in smart cities. Sustainability, 13, 11438.
  • Cattacin, S. & Zimmer, A. (2016). Chapter 2: Urban governance and social innovations in social innovations Bransen et. Al. (Eds.). in Social Innovations in the Urban Contex: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (p.21-44). Springer, Cham.
  • Chen, Y., Su, X. & Zhou, Q. (2021). Study on the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10231.
  • Cleave, J. & Geijsman, J. (2020). LibraryCraft – how the COVID-19 pandemic led to the growth of the WA libraries public Minecraft server. Digital Library Perspectives, 36, 377-388.
  • Diganta, D. & Zhang, J. J. (2021). Pandemic in a smart city: Singapore’s COVID-19 management through technology & society. Urban Geography, 42, 408-416.
  • Hestad, D., Tabara, J. D. & Thornton, T. F. (2021). The role of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations in the development of transformative capacities: The case of Barcelona. Cities, 119, 1-13.
  • Hidayat, S., Halid, J., Dirgantara, T., Kusuma, M. A., Utomo, H., Widianto S. R., Rejeki, I. S., Mihradi, S., Raharno, S., Rukanta, D. & Tjahjono, H. (2020). Lessons learned from rapid development of CPAP Ventilator Vent-I during Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering and Technological Science, 52, 765-778.
  • Hou, X., Ma, Q. & Wang, X. (2021). Spatial differentiation and elements influencing urban resilience in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under the COVID-19 pandemic. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(1), 1-18.
  • Imai, H. & JI, Y. (2021). Social capital, innovation, and local resilience: Tokyo neighbourhood in times of crisis. Asian Studies IX (XXV), 1, 283–313.
  • Jeong, E., Hagose, M., Jung H., Ki, M. & Flahault, A. (2020). Understanding South Korea’s response to the COVID-19 outbreak: A real-time analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Case Report, 17, 9571.
  • Le, T. T., Ngo, H. Q. & Aureliano-Silva, L. (2020). Contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs’ performance in an emerging market – the mediating roles of brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1516.
  • Maestosi, C. P., Andreucci, M. B. & Civiero, P. (2021). Sustainable urban areas for 2030 in a post-COVID-19 scenario: Focus on innovative research and funding frameworks to boost transition towards 100 positive energy districts and 100 climate-neutral cities. Energies, 14, 216.
  • Maynardes, D. & Fariniuk, T. (2020). Smart cities and the pandemic: digital technologies on the urban management of Brazilian cities. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 860-873.
  • Mehmood, A. & Imran, M. (2021). Digital social innovation and civic participation: Toward responsible and inclusive transport planning. European Planning Studies, 29(10), 1870-1885
  • McGuirk, P. Dowling, R., Maalsen S. & Baker, T. (2021). Urban governance innovation and COVID-19. Geographical Research, 59, 188–195.
  • Painter, D., T., Shutters, S. T. & Wentz, E. (2021). Innovations and economic output scale with social interactions in the workforce. Urban Science, 5, 21.
  • Porotto, A. & Ledent, G. (2021). Crisis and transition: Forms of collective housing in Brussels. Buildings, 11, 162.
  • Samkange, F., Ramkissoon, H., Chipumuro, J., Wanyama, H. & Chawla, G. (2021). Innovative and sustainable food production and food consumption entrepreneurship: A conceptual recipe for delivering development success in South Africa. Sustainability, 13, 11049.
  • Sharif, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R. & Kummitha, R.K.R. (2021). Contributions of smart city solutions and technologies to resilience against the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Sustainability, 13, 8018.
  • Tarsitano, E., Sinibaldib, P. & Colao, V. (2021). Green days in the Park: A case study on Landsenses Ecology. Internatıonal Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28, 632-643.
  • Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with The rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43, 1168-1192.
  • Timulak, L. (2014). Qualitative meta-analysis. Flick, U (Ed.). in The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (p.481-495). SAGE Publications.
  • UN (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance (Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241) Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf.
  • UN (2020). Policy Brief: COVID-19 in an Urban World. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/sg_policy_brief_covid_urban_world.pdf.
  • UN-Habitat (2020). UN-Habitat Guidance on COVID-19 and Public Space (Covid Response 1). UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/06/un-habitat_guidance_on_covid-19_and_public_space.pdf.
  • WHO (2020). Strengthening Preparedness for COVID-19 in Cities and Urban Settings Interim Guidance for Local Authorities (WHO/2019-nCoV/ Urban_preparedness/2020.1). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331896/WHO-2019-nCoV-Urban_preparedness-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  • Voda, M., Murgu, A., Sarpe, C. A., Graves, S. M. & Avram, C. (2021). The Tigani community adaptability to changes in rural Romania and the COVID-19 Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10622.
  • Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30, 388-405.
  • Zukin, S. (2020). Seeing like a city: How tech became urban. Theory and Society, 49, 941–964.
  • Zukin, S. (2021). Planetary silicon valley: Deconstructing New York’s innovation complex. Urban Studies, 58, 3–35.

“Social Innovation” and Urban Policy during Covid 19: Systematic Literature Review and Content Analysis

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 46, 217 - 227, 30.03.2022
https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1092792

Öz

This article focuses on how social innovation activities were developed in the urban context during the Covid 19 pandemic, through systematic literature review and content analysis. The literature search was carried out between June and September 2021 on the Web of Science database. 64 articles reached from the database were filtered by applying exclusion-inclusion criteria. After examining the article abstracts, it was determined that 23 articles were closely related to the research subject. Using the NVIVO qualitative analysis program, key features of social innovation in the urban context during COVID 19 were analyzed (in terms of being value-based, social needs/problem-oriented, change-oriented). The research findings are discussed in three sub-titles, revealing the "basic values", "prominent social problems/needs and solution proposals" and "main stakeholders" of social innovation in the context of urban policies during the pandemic. The results of the analysis have shown that the understanding of social innovation in the urban context during COVID 19 has been associated with collective values and focused on the responsibilities of local governments for the realization of social human rights. In this framework, attention is drawn to the opportunities for the implementation of participatory democracy at the level of local governments.

Kaynakça

  • Abid, M. & Muhammad, I. (2021) Digital social innovation and civic participation: Toward responsible and inclusive transport planning. European Planning Studies, 29, 1870-1885.
  • Brandsen, T., Evers, A., Cattacin, S. & Zimmer, A. (2016). Chapter 25: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly in Social Innovation Bransen et. Al. (Eds.). in Social Innovations in the Urban Contex: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (p.303-310). Springer, Cham.
  • Buffel, T., Yarker, S., Phillipson, C., Lang, L., Lewis, C., Doran, P. & Gof, M. (2021). Locked down by inequality: Older people and the COVID-19 pandemic. Special issue article: Urban Public Health Emergencies and The Covid-19 Pandemic. Urban Studies, 00, 1-18.
  • Calzada, I. (2020). Replicating smart cities: The city-to-city learning programme in the replicate EC-H2020-SCC Project. Smart Cities, 3, 978–1003.
  • Calzada, I. (2021). The right to have digital rights in smart cities. Sustainability, 13, 11438.
  • Cattacin, S. & Zimmer, A. (2016). Chapter 2: Urban governance and social innovations in social innovations Bransen et. Al. (Eds.). in Social Innovations in the Urban Contex: Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies (p.21-44). Springer, Cham.
  • Chen, Y., Su, X. & Zhou, Q. (2021). Study on the spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10231.
  • Cleave, J. & Geijsman, J. (2020). LibraryCraft – how the COVID-19 pandemic led to the growth of the WA libraries public Minecraft server. Digital Library Perspectives, 36, 377-388.
  • Diganta, D. & Zhang, J. J. (2021). Pandemic in a smart city: Singapore’s COVID-19 management through technology & society. Urban Geography, 42, 408-416.
  • Hestad, D., Tabara, J. D. & Thornton, T. F. (2021). The role of sustainability-oriented hybrid organisations in the development of transformative capacities: The case of Barcelona. Cities, 119, 1-13.
  • Hidayat, S., Halid, J., Dirgantara, T., Kusuma, M. A., Utomo, H., Widianto S. R., Rejeki, I. S., Mihradi, S., Raharno, S., Rukanta, D. & Tjahjono, H. (2020). Lessons learned from rapid development of CPAP Ventilator Vent-I during Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering and Technological Science, 52, 765-778.
  • Hou, X., Ma, Q. & Wang, X. (2021). Spatial differentiation and elements influencing urban resilience in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River under the COVID-19 pandemic. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2021(1), 1-18.
  • Imai, H. & JI, Y. (2021). Social capital, innovation, and local resilience: Tokyo neighbourhood in times of crisis. Asian Studies IX (XXV), 1, 283–313.
  • Jeong, E., Hagose, M., Jung H., Ki, M. & Flahault, A. (2020). Understanding South Korea’s response to the COVID-19 outbreak: A real-time analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Case Report, 17, 9571.
  • Le, T. T., Ngo, H. Q. & Aureliano-Silva, L. (2020). Contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs’ performance in an emerging market – the mediating roles of brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1516.
  • Maestosi, C. P., Andreucci, M. B. & Civiero, P. (2021). Sustainable urban areas for 2030 in a post-COVID-19 scenario: Focus on innovative research and funding frameworks to boost transition towards 100 positive energy districts and 100 climate-neutral cities. Energies, 14, 216.
  • Maynardes, D. & Fariniuk, T. (2020). Smart cities and the pandemic: digital technologies on the urban management of Brazilian cities. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 860-873.
  • Mehmood, A. & Imran, M. (2021). Digital social innovation and civic participation: Toward responsible and inclusive transport planning. European Planning Studies, 29(10), 1870-1885
  • McGuirk, P. Dowling, R., Maalsen S. & Baker, T. (2021). Urban governance innovation and COVID-19. Geographical Research, 59, 188–195.
  • Painter, D., T., Shutters, S. T. & Wentz, E. (2021). Innovations and economic output scale with social interactions in the workforce. Urban Science, 5, 21.
  • Porotto, A. & Ledent, G. (2021). Crisis and transition: Forms of collective housing in Brussels. Buildings, 11, 162.
  • Samkange, F., Ramkissoon, H., Chipumuro, J., Wanyama, H. & Chawla, G. (2021). Innovative and sustainable food production and food consumption entrepreneurship: A conceptual recipe for delivering development success in South Africa. Sustainability, 13, 11049.
  • Sharif, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R. & Kummitha, R.K.R. (2021). Contributions of smart city solutions and technologies to resilience against the COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. Sustainability, 13, 8018.
  • Tarsitano, E., Sinibaldib, P. & Colao, V. (2021). Green days in the Park: A case study on Landsenses Ecology. Internatıonal Journal Of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28, 632-643.
  • Thompson, M. (2019). Playing with The rules of the game: Social innovation for urban transformation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43, 1168-1192.
  • Timulak, L. (2014). Qualitative meta-analysis. Flick, U (Ed.). in The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (p.481-495). SAGE Publications.
  • UN (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, Key Findings and Advance (Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241) Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/Key_Findings_WPP_2015.pdf.
  • UN (2020). Policy Brief: COVID-19 in an Urban World. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-07/sg_policy_brief_covid_urban_world.pdf.
  • UN-Habitat (2020). UN-Habitat Guidance on COVID-19 and Public Space (Covid Response 1). UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2020/06/un-habitat_guidance_on_covid-19_and_public_space.pdf.
  • WHO (2020). Strengthening Preparedness for COVID-19 in Cities and Urban Settings Interim Guidance for Local Authorities (WHO/2019-nCoV/ Urban_preparedness/2020.1). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/331896/WHO-2019-nCoV-Urban_preparedness-2020.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  • Voda, M., Murgu, A., Sarpe, C. A., Graves, S. M. & Avram, C. (2021). The Tigani community adaptability to changes in rural Romania and the COVID-19 Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10622.
  • Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30, 388-405.
  • Zukin, S. (2020). Seeing like a city: How tech became urban. Theory and Society, 49, 941–964.
  • Zukin, S. (2021). Planetary silicon valley: Deconstructing New York’s innovation complex. Urban Studies, 58, 3–35.
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Burcu Hatıboğlu Kısat Bu kişi benim 0000-0002-4396-8412

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 25 Mart 2022
Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Mart 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 46

Kaynak Göster

APA Hatıboğlu Kısat, B. (2022). “Social Innovation” and Urban Policy during Covid 19: Systematic Literature Review and Content Analysis. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 19(46), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1092792