Women’s Access to Urban Social Services in Çankaya District: A Mix Method Research

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 51, 138 - 148, 31.01.2023

Burcu Hatiboğlu Kısat Ali Alpaslan Odabaş

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1213973

Öz

The purpose of this study was to develop a comprehensive understanding on women’s access to urban welfare/social services issues and solutions for developing gender sensitive urban welfare/social services. The mixed research were conducted in Çankaya, Ankara, based on the principles of feminist methodology to answer to how the rights to access to urban services of women residents could be achieved by regarding their satisfaction of the urban social services and their daily urban life experiences? Different tools in qualitative and quantitative research methods were used to collect and generate data. Integrated findings that are based on the combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis were presented into two parts; which includes socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and the effective and accessible urban social services for women in Çankaya. It was identified that urban infrastructure and welfare/social services of Çankaya could not respond to the gender needs of women living here and caused to their dissatisfaction about the existing urban services and municipal activities. In conclusion, a new perspective were recommended for developing that focuses on the transformation of gender relations within space and urban services based on the principles of being “free of charge”, “accessible”, “inclusive”, “safe and secure”, “empowering”, “healthy” and “right-based”.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Women’s Access To Urban Social Services, Urban Policy, Gender Relations, Gender Equality, Çankaya

Proje Numarası

proje no: NEAR-TS/2017/391-682

Kaynakça

• Hatiboğlu-Kısat (2022). Gendered experiences of loneliness during COVID-19 isolation: Insights for intersectional feminist social work – the case of Çankaya/Ankara, Turkey. International Social Work, 0(0), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728221119283.
• Akduran, Ö., Önal, A. Y., & Şenesen, G. G. (2018). Kentsel haklar ve hizmetlere erişimde toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği haritalama ve izleme raporu. http://www.ceidizleme.org/medya/dosya/81.pdf (accessed 22.10.2022)
• Alkan, A. (2006). Belediye kadınlara da hizmet eder! kadın dostu belediye hizmetleri: Neden, nasıl?. Ka-Der.
• Beebeejaun, Y. (2017). Gender, urban space, and the right to everyday life. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(3): 323-334, DOI: 10.1080/07352166.2016.1255526.
• Buckingham, S. (2010). Examining the right to the city from a gender perpsective’. A. Sungraynes, and C.Mathivet (eds) Cities For All. Proposals and experiences towards the right to the city. Habitat International Coalition, HIC.
• Charter for Women's Right to the City (2004). http://www.ceidizleme.org/ekutuphane/143 (accessed 02.10.2021)
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitive, quantative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
• Çankaya Municipality's Strategic Plan (2015-2019). http://www.Çankaya.bel.tr/stratejikPlan.html (accessed 01.10.2021).
• Çankaya Municipality's Strategic Plan (2019-2020). http://www.Çankaya.bel.tr/uploads/files/ÇANKAYA_BELEDIYE_STRATEJIK_PLAN.pdf (accessed 01.10.2021).
• Çankaya Municipality's Local Equality Action Plan 2016-2019. http://www.charter-equality.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/TR_Çankaya-municipality-local-equality-action-plan-_TURKISHENGLISH.pdf (accessed 01.10.2021).
• Çankaya Municipality's web site http://www.Çankaya.bel.tr (accessed 01.10.2021).
• Doan, P. (2010). The tyranny of gendered spaces - reflections from beyond the gender dichotomy. Gender, Place and Culture, 17(5), 635-654.
• European Charter of Local Self-Governance (1985). https://www.tbb.gov.tr/mevzuat/kanunlar/Avrupa_Yerel_Yonetimler_ozerklik_Sarti.pdf (accessed 22.10.2022).
• European Urban Charter (2008). https://rm.coe.int/urban-charter-ii-manifesto-for-a-new-urbanity-publication-a5-58-pages-/168095e1d5 (accessed 22.10.2022).
• Fenster, T. (2005). The right to the gendered city: Different formations of belonging in everyday life. Journal of Gender Studies, 14, 217-231.
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (Çev. H. Aydın) (4. baskı). Eğitim Yayınevi.
• Meadow, T. (2010). "A rose is a rose": On producing legal gender classifications. Gender and Society, 24(6), 8.
• Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford.
• Moser, C. (2016). Gender transformation in a new global urban agenda: challenges for Habitat III and beyond. Environment & Urbanization, 29(1), 221–236. DOI: 10.1177/0956247816662573.
• Sánchez de Madariaga, I. (2013). From women in transport to gender in transport: Challenging conceptual frameworks for improved policymaking. Journal of International Affairs, The Gender Issue: Beyond Exclusion, 67(1), 43-65.
• Spain, D. (2014). Gender and urban space. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 581–598.
• TUİK (2018). 2018 Türkiye Population Statistics, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ (accessed 15.10.2021).
• TUİK (2019). 2019 Türkiye Population Statistics, http://www.tuik.gov.tr/ (accessed 15.10.2021).
• United Nations Entity for Gender and The Empowerment of Women [UN-WOMEN]. (2015). The beijing platform for action. https://beijing20.unwomen.org/en/about (accessed 15.10.2022).