Are Dissertations Trustworthy Enough? The case of Turkish Ph.D. Dissertations on Social Studies Education

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 344 - 361, 01.05.2022

Önder Eryılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.70.9.3

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Although there is an increasing number of studies concentrating upon education, some researchers have revealed that most studies, including qualitative studies in education, have methodological issues. One of the most common mistakes and neglected issues in qualitative studies is not to ensure the trustworthiness of the research, which indeed is an important component for the rigor of the study. The main purpose of this study is to examine how researchers ensure the trustworthiness of Ph.D. dissertations in social studies education. Document analysis was employed in the study. I examined 197 Ph.D. dissertations belonging to years 2002 and 2020 as well as to the field of social studies education which were obtained from the National Dissertation Center of Turkish Higher Education Council. I used the deductive coding and analysis approach in order to examine dissertations. The study results revealed that no trustworthiness strategy was used or reported in nearly half of Ph.D. dissertations that were conducted in the field of social studies education. Researchers mostly preferred to use validity and reliability terms, which are highly criticized by some scholars as to the paradigm of qualitative orientations. Besides, while some trustworthiness strategies such as peer debriefing and external audit were mainly used, others such as negative case analysis and stepwise replication were not used or reported in any dissertation. Some recommendations were made considering the study results and discussions at the end of the study.

Keywords

Qualitative research, Trustworthiness, Social studies education

References

• Akpınar, M., & Kaymakçı, S. (2012). A comparative view to Turkish social studies education’s general goal. Kastamonu Education Journal, 20(2), 605-626.
• Amankwaa, L. (2016). Creating protocols for trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 23 (3), 121-127.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal. 9 (2), 27-40.
• Canbulat, T., Görkem, Avcu & Sipahi, S. (2016). Abd ve Kanada ve Türkiye’de sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alanındaki tezlerin değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of the thesis in the field of social studies in the USA and Canada]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (2), 351-370.
• Carcary, M. (2009). The Research Audit Trail--Enhancing Trustworthiness in Qualitative Inquiry. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7 (1).
• Chapin, J. R. (1974). Social studies dissertations: 1969-1973. ERIC Clearing House for Social Studies/Social Sciences,
• Cooley, A. (2013). Qualitative education research: the origins, debates, and politics of creating knowledge. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association. 49 (3), 247-262.
• Creswell, JW. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. CA: Sage Publications.
• Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: a systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72 (3), 281-297.
• Curtin, M. & Fossey, E. (2007). Appraising the trustworthiness of qualitative studies: Guidelines for occupational therapists. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54, 88-94.
• Çayır, K., & Gürkaynak, İ. (2007). The state of citizenship education in Turkey: Past and present. The Journal of Social Science Education, 6(2), 50-58.
• Dilek, A., Baysan, S. & Öztürk, A. A. (2018). Türkiye’de sosyal bilgiler eğitimi üzerine yapılan yüksek lisans tezleri: Bir içerik analizi çalışması [Social studies education master thesis in Turkey: A content analysis study]. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 22 (2), 581-602.
• Dhand, H. (1984). An analysis of Canadian thesis in social studies education. History and Social Science Teacher, 19 (3), 160-164.
• Dhand, H. (1988). Analysis of Canadian thesis in social studies education, 1981-1985. History and Social Science Teacher, 23 (2), 99-102.
• Duman, A. & İnel, Y. (2019). Review of master's theses in the field of social studies education between 2008 and 2014. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7 (1), 66-73.
• Elo, S., Kaariainen, M., Kanste, O, Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K. & Kyngas, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open, 4 (1), 1-10.
• Gross, R. E., & De La Cruz, L. (1971). Social Studies Dissertation 1963-1969.ERIC Clearing House for Social Studies/Social Sciences Education,
• Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29 (2), 75-91.
• Gunawan, J. (2015). Ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 1 (1), 10-11.
• Güleç, S., & Hüdavendigar, M. N. (2020). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alaninda okuryazarlik becerisi başliğinda yapilan lisansüstü tezlerin incelenmesi [Examination of the postgraduate theses prepared under the title of literacy skills in the field of social studies education]. Uluslararası İnsan ve Sanat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (3), 24-36.
• Haçat Oğuz, S. & Demir, F. B. (2018). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi üzerine yapılan doktora tezlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the doctoral dissertations conducted on social studies education (2002-2018)]. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (15), 948-973.
• Hepburn, M. A., & Dahler, A. (1985). An Overview of Social Studies Dissertations, 1977–1982. Theory & Research in Social Education, 13 (2), 73-82.
• Harding, J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis from start to finish. Sage: London.
• Karakuş, S. (2020). Türkiye’de sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde kavramlar konusunda yapılan yüksek lisans ve doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi [An examine master thesis and Phd dissertations conducted in the field of the concepts in social studies education in Turkey]. Academia Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5 (1), 61-76.
• Kayaalp, F., & Karameşe, E. N. (2020). Türkiye’de sosyal bilgiler eğitimi kapsamında hazırlanan “vatandaşlık” konulu lisansüstü tezlerdeki eğilimler [Trends in Graduate Theses on "Citizenship" in the fieldof Social Studies Education in Turkey]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (1), 744-786.
• Krefting, L. (1990). Rigor in qualitative research: The assessment of trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45 (3), 214-222.
• Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, (ed. J.M. Morse). Sage Publications, Newbury Park.
• Lietz, C. A., Langer, C. L. & Furman, R. (2006). Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: Implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qualitative Social Work, 5 (4), 441-458.
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry, 289(331), 289-327.
• Lombard, M., Snyder‐Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human communication research, 28(4), 587-604.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage.
• Morse, J. M. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1 (2), 13-22.
• Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25 (9), 1212-1222.
• Murphy, F. J. & Yielder, J. (2009). Establishing rigor in qualitative radiography research. Radiography, 16 (1), 62-67.
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
• O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406919899220.
• O’Donoghue, T. (2007). Planning Your Qualitative Research Project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education. Routledge: Abingdon.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Daniel, L. G. (2003). Typology of analytical and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research. Current Issues in Education, 6 (2).
• Öner, G. & Öner, D. (2017). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde coğrafya konuları üzerine yapılmış lisansüstü tezlere yönelik bir analiz ve bibliyografya çalışması [An analysis and bibliography study of graduate theses written on geography subjects in social studies education]. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 34 (2), 13-34.
• Öztürk, C. (2012). Sosyal bilgiler: Toplumsal yaşama disiplinlerarası bir bakış. [Social studies: An interdisciplinary view of social life]. C. Öztürk (Ed.) In social studies teaching, (p. 2-31). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Patton, M. Q. (200). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. California: Sage.
• Saban, A., Koçbeker Eid, B. N., Saban, A., Alan, S., Doğru, S., Ege, İ., Arslantaş, S., Çınar, D. & Tunç, P. (2010). Eğitimbilim alanında nitel araştırma metodolojisi ile gerçekleştirilen makalelerin analiz edilmesi [An analysis of educational articles conducted by the qualitative research methodology]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30, 125-142.
• Sadik, O. (2019). A Discussion of the Concepts of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Akdeniz Egitim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 13(28), 145-156. DOI: 10.29329/mjer.2019.202.8.
• Sağdıç, M. (2019). Türkiye’de Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde disiplinlerarası öğretim yaklaşımının tarihsel gelişimi [Historical development of interdisciplinary teaching approaches in social studies education in Turkey]. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 8(2), 390-403. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i2.2121
• Sandelowski, M. (1993). Rigor or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in nursing science, 16 (2), 1-8.
• Saxe, D. W., Jackson, M. L. & Mraz, M. (1994). Dissertation research in social studies 1981-1991.
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22 (2), 63-75.
• Şahin, M. D. & Öztürk, G. (2019). Mixed method research: Theoretical foundations, designs and its use in educational research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6 (2), 301-310.
• Şahin, M., Yıldız, D. G., & Duman, R. (2011). Türkiye’deki sosyal bilgiler eğitimi tezleri üzerine bir değerlendirme [An evaluation of the theses on social studies education in Turkey]. Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (2), 96-121.
• Tarman, B., Acun, Ċ., & Yüksel, Z. (2010). Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Alanındaki Tezlerin Değerlendirilmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 725-746.
• Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1-A9.
• Wrubel, P. R. & Ratliff, R. (1978). Social studies dissertations: 1973-1976. ERIC Clearing House for Social Studies/Social Sciences.