BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2003, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 1 - 14, 01.03.2003

Öz

THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW

Yıl 2003, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 1 - 14, 01.03.2003

Öz

Historically, international law governing the utilisation of transboundary freshwater resources has been concerned with the issue of water allocation between riparian states. The first major recorded water dispute of legal significance dates back to 1895, when Mexico charged the Unites States of America with diverting water from the Rio Grande in violation of international law.1 Before it eventually led to an agreement between Mexico and the US in 1906,2 the US Attorney General Judson Harmon had delivered a legal opinion on the state of international law, which set the scene for years to come. 3 What became known as the Harmon Doctrine the theory of absolute territorial sovereignty, granting a riparian state complete freedom of action with respect to the portion of an international river within its own territory regardless of its harmful consequences for other riparian states 4 attracted another opposing extreme; the theory of absolute territorial integrity, favourable to lower riparian states.5 Nevertheless, international law has since developed in such a way as to ensure equitable resolutions of international water disputes under the theory of limited territorial sovereignty

Toplam 0 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Mete Erdem Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Mart 2003
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2003 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Erdem, M. (2003). THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 8(1), 1-14.
AMA Erdem M. THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. PERCEPTIONS. Mart 2003;8(1):1-14.
Chicago Erdem, Mete. “THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 8, sy. 1 (Mart 2003): 1-14.
EndNote Erdem M (01 Mart 2003) THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 8 1 1–14.
IEEE M. Erdem, “THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW”, PERCEPTIONS, c. 8, sy. 1, ss. 1–14, 2003.
ISNAD Erdem, Mete. “THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 8/1 (Mart 2003), 1-14.
JAMA Erdem M. THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. PERCEPTIONS. 2003;8:1–14.
MLA Erdem, Mete. “THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, c. 8, sy. 1, 2003, ss. 1-14.
Vancouver Erdem M. THE TIGRIS-EUPHRATES RIVERS CONTROVERSY AND THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW. PERCEPTIONS. 2003;8(1):1-14.