AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY AND SEPTEMBER 11

Year 2003, Volume: 8 Issue: 1, 0 - 0, 01.03.2003

Cenap Cakmak

Abstract

Nearly all political and economic pundits agree that the events of September 11 2001 have changed “everything”, including American foreign policy. The question is whether the degree of change is “remarkable”. In the following pages an attempt will be made to describe some basic aspects of American foreign policy and to determine the implications of terrorist attacks on American foreign policy output.

References

• Albright, M.K. (1998, Nov./Dec.). The testing of American foreign policy’. Foreign Affairs
• (6), 50-64. Retrieved December 20, 2002, from Academic Search Premier Database.
• Gaddis, J.L. (2002, Nov./Oct.). ‘A grand strategy of transformation’. Foreign Policy, 133, 50
• Retrieved December 15, 2002, from Academic Search Premier Database.
• Glendening, P.N. & Reeves, M.M. (1984). Pragmatic federalism: An intergovernmental view of American government (2nd ed.). Pacific Palisades, CA: Palisades Publishers.
• Gokay, B. (2002). ‘The most dangerous game in the world: oil, war and U.S.’ [Electronic version]. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 1(2), 47-68.
• Haass, R.N. (2001, November 16). American foreign policy after September 11th. Retrieved
• December 24, 2002, from http://www.state.gov/s/p/rem/6310.htm
• Hirsch, M. (2002, Sept./Oct.). ‘Bush and the world’. Foreign Affairs, 81(5), 18-44. Retrieved
• December 21, 2002, from Academic Search Premier Database.
• Howard, D. (n.d.). After September 11: chances for a left foreign policy. Retrieved December 12, 2002, from http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/howard2_text_only.htm th
• Howard, M. (2002, Jan./Feb.). ‘What’s in a name’. Foreign Affairs, 81(1), 8-13. Retrieved
• December 19, 2002, from Academic Search Premier Database.
• Krislov, S. (2001, Winter). ‘American federalism as American exceptionalism’. PUBLIUS
• (1), 9-26. Retrieved December 18, 2002, from Academic Search Premier Database.