PEYZAJ KAVRAMINA DAİR FARKLI YAKLAŞIMLAR VE KÜLTÜREL MİRAS ANLAYIŞINDA PEYZAJIN YERİ

Yıl 2024, , 140 - 153, 31.12.2024

Yasemin Aydoğdu

https://doi.org/10.53784/peyzaj.1548037

Öz

Bu yazıda, anlaşılması ve tanımlaması zor bir kavram olan peyzajın hangi farklı anlamlara karşılık gelebileceği üzerine bir tartışma yürütülmek istenmiştir. Avrupa Konseyi'nin 2000 yılında hazırladığı “Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi” sonrasında bilimsel çalışmalara daha fazla konu edilmesine rağmen, peyzajın kavram olarak ne anlama geldiği konusunda yoğun tartışmalar devam etmektedir. Avrupa Konseyi, ICOMOS ve UNESCO gibi uluslararası kuruluşların hazırladığı tüzük, sözleşme, bildiri veya tavsiye kararlarına bakıldığında da peyzaj kavramına ilişkin anlayış farklılıklarının devam ettiği görülmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu makalenin amacı, hem peyzaj kuramcılarının hem de uluslararası kurumların yaklaşımları üzerinden peyzaj kavramının bugüne kadar hangi farklı bağlamlarda tartışıldığını ortaya koymak ve peyzaja dair bir anlayış geliştirmektir. Bu anlayışın temeli, peyzajın başlı başına kültürel mirasa ilişkin olduğudur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Peyzaj, Avrupa Peyzaj Sözleşmesi, Avrupa Konseyi, ICOMOS, UNESCO, Kültürel Miras

Destekleyen Kurum

İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Restorasyon Lisansüstü Programında devam eden doktora tezimden türetilmiştir. Tez çalışmam 2015/16 yıllarında British Academy Newton Fund Advanced Fellowship ile desteklenen Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi’nden Doç. Dr. Günder Varinlioğlu ve Newcastle University’den Prof. Dr. Sam Turner ortak yürütücülüğündeki “Boğsak in Isauria – new approaches to historic landscape” adlı proje ile bağlantılı hazırlanmaktadır. Ek olarak “Silifke Kırsalı Tarihsel Peyzaj Niteliklerinin HLC (Historic Landscape Characterisation) Yöntemine Göre Değerlendirilmesi” isimli proje ile İTÜ Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi tarafından MDK_2017_40863 proje numarası ile desteklenmiştir. Ayrıca 2014-2017 yılları içinde “Başbakanlık Doktora Bursu” alınmıştır.

DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO THE CONCEPT OF LANDSCAPE AND THE PLACE OF LANDSCAPE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE

Öz

This article aims to discuss the different meanings that landscape, a concept that is difficult to understand and define, can have. Despite the fact that it has been the subject of more scientific studies after the “European Landscape Convention” prepared by the Council of Europe in 2000, intense discussions continue on what landscape means as a concept. When we look at the charters, guidelines, conventions or recommendations prepared by international organizations such as the Council of Europe, ICOMOS and UNESCO, it is seen that there are still differences of understanding regarding the concept of landscape.. Therefore, the aim of this article is to clarify in which different contexts the concept of landscape has been discussed so far by both landscape theorists and international institutions and to develop an understanding of landscape. The basis of this understanding is that landscape is related to cultural heritage in its own right.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Landscape, European Landscape Convention, Council of Europe, ICOMOS, UNESCO, Cultural Heritage

Kaynakça

• Alcock, S.E. (1993). Graecia Capta - The landscapes of Roman Greece. Cambridge, University Press.
• Aldred, O. (2007). Identifying and assessing landscape through historic landscape characterisation. In Halldórsson, G., Oddsdóttir, E.S. and Eggertsson, Ó. (Editors), Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development, Proceedings of the AFFORDNORD conference, June 18th-22nd, 2005 (pp. 227-234). Iceland: Reykholt.
• Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21-34.
• Barrett, J. (1991). The archaeology of social reproduction. In J. Barrett, R. Bradley, and M. Green, Landscape, Monuments and Society: The prehistory of Cranborne Chase, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 6-8.
• Bender, B. (2002). Time and Landscape. Current Archaeology, 43 (S4), (s.103-112). https://doi.org/10.1086/339561
• Bender, B. (2006). Place and Landscape. In Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuechler, S., Rowlands, M. & Spyer, P. (Editors), Handboook of Material Culture, (303-314). London: Sage Publications.
• Branton, N. (2009). Landscape Approaches in Historical Archaeology: The Archaeology of Places. In Majewski, T. and Gaimster, D. (Editors) International Handbook of Historic Archaeology, (pp. 51-65). NewYork: Springer.
• Carruthers, M. (1998). The Craft of Thought – Meditation, rhetoric, and the making of images, 400-1200. Cambridge University Press.
• COE (1995). Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the Integrated Conservation of Cultural Landscapes Areas as part of Landscape Policies (Recommendation No. R (95) 9). Council of Europe Committee of Ministers.
• COE (2000). European Landscape Convention (European Treaty Series No. 176). Florence: 20.10.2000.
• COE (2005). Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (Council of Europe Treaty Series No. 199). Faro: 27.10.2005.
• Cosgrove, D. (1984). Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. London: Croom Helm.
• Cosgrove, D. (1985). Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the Landscape Idea. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol.10, No.1, 45- 62.The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
• Cosgrove, D. (1990). Landscape studies in geography and cognate fields of the humanities and social science. Landscape Research, 15 (3): 1-6.
• Crawford, O.G.S. (1953). Archaeology in the Field. London: Phoenix House Ltd.
• Daniels, S. & Cosgrove, D. (1988). Introduction: iconography and landscape. In Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S., (Eds.), The Iconography of Landscape: Essays On The Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments (pp. 1-10), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Darvill, T. (1999). The historic environment, historic landscapes, and space-time-action models in landscape archaeology. In Ucko, P. J. and Layton, R., (Eds.), The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape, London: Routledge: 106-120.
• Darvill, T., Gerrard, C. & Startin, B. (1993). Identifying and protecting historic landscapes. Antiquity, 67: 563-74.
• Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 31-4: 363-384.
• Department of the Environment and Department of National Heritage of the United Kingdom. (1994). Planning policy guidance: planning and the historic environment (PPG 15), the Secretary of State for the Environment and the Secretary of State for National Heritage.
• Fairclough, G. (1999). Protecting time and space: understanding historic landscape for conservation in England. In Ucko, P. J. and Layton, R., (Eds.), The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape (pp. 121-136). London: Routledge.
• Fairclough, G.J. (2002). Archaeologists and the European Convention. In Fairclough and Rippon (Editors), Europe’s Cultural Landscape: Archaeologists and the Management of Change (pp. 25-37). Belgium: Europae Archaeologiae Consilium.
• Fairclough, G.J. (2012). The Value of Heritage for the Future. In Ünsal (Editor), Heritage for Society: Cultural Policy & Management (KPY) Yearbook 3, 2011 (pp. 34-41). İstanbul: Bilgi University Press.
• Grimm, J. & Grimm, W. (1885). Deutsches Wörterbuch. L.M. Bearbeitet von Dr. Moriz Heyne. Sechster Band. Leipzig, Verlag Von S. Hırzel. https://archive.org/details/deutscheswrter06grimuoft/page/n7/mode/2up
• Harmanşah, Ö. (2015). Eski Yakındoğu’da Kent, Bellek, Anıt (F. Yavuz, Çev.). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Hartshorne, R. (1939). The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol.29, No.3 (pp. 173-412). Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Association of American Geographers. URL: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/2561063>
• Hellpach, W. (1911). Die Geopsychischen Erscheinungen. Leipzig, Verlag Von Wilhelm Engelman.
• Herring, P.C. (2009). Framing Perceptions of the Historic Landscape: Historic Landscape Characterisation (HLC) and Historic Land-Use Assessment (HLA). Scottish Geographical Journal, 125 (1): 61-77.
• Hirsch, E. (1995). Introduction - Landscape: Between Place and Space. In E. Hirsch and M. O’Hanlon (Editors), The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspective on Place and Space (pp. 1-30). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• ICOMOS (1964). International Charter For The Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (The Venice Charter 1964). Venice: 25-31.05.1964.
• ICOMOS (2014). The Florence Declaration on Heritage and Landscape as Human Values. Florence: 9-14.11.2014.
• ICOMOS - IFLA (1982). The Florence Charter : Historic Gardens. Florence: 21 May 1981.
• ICOMOS - IFLA (2017). Principles Concerning Rural Landscapes as Heritage (GA 2017 6-3-1 – Doctrinal Texts). 30.07.2017.
• Inglis, F. (1977). Nation and Community: A Landscape and its Morality. The Sociological Review, Vol.25, Issue.3, (pp. 489-514). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1977.tb00301.x
• Ingold, T. (1993). The Temporality of Landscape. World Archaeology, Vol.25, No.2, Conceptions of Time and Ancient Society (pp. 152-174).
• Ingold, T. (2011). Landscape or Weather-World?. In T. Ingold (Editor), Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description (pp. 126-135). London: Routledge.
• Jackson, J.B. (1984). Discovering The Vernacular Landscape. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
• Johnston, R. (1998). Approaches to the perception of landscape. Archaeological Dialogues, Vol 5, Issue 01: pp. 54-68. doi:10.1017/S1380203800001161
• Kaplan, R. (1985). The Analysis of Perception via Preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning 12: 161-176.
• Knapp, A.B. & Ashmore, W. (1999). Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational. In W. Ashmore, A.B. Knapp, (Eds.), Archaeologies of Landscape Contemporary Perspectives (pp. 1-30). Blackwell Publishers.
• Marquardt, W.H. & Crumley, C.L. (1987). Theoretical Issues in the Analysis of Spatial Patterning. In Crumley, C.L. and Marquardt, W.H. (Eds.), Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective (pp. 1-18), San Diego, Academic Press.
• Meinig, D.W. (1979). The Beholding Eye – Ten Versions of the Same Scene. In D.W. Meinig (Ed.), The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays (pp. 33-48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government, U.K. (2019). National Planning Policy Framework. <https://www.gov.uk/guidance/national-planning-policy-framework>, erişim tarihi 15.11.2020.
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (ODPM). (1990). Planning Policy Guidance 16: Archaeology and planning.
• Olwig, K.R. (1996). Recovering the Substantive Nature of Landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86:4, 630-653.
• Olwig, K.R. (2004). “This is Not a Landscape”: Circulating Reference and Land Shaping. In Palang, H., Sooväli, H., Antrop, M. and Setten, G. (eds), European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment (pp. 41-65). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Olwig, K.R. (2007). The Practice of Landscape ‘Conventions’ and the Just Landscape: The Case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, Vol. 32, No.5: 579-594.
• Olwig, K.R. (2008). Performing on the Landscape versus Doing Landscape: Perambulatory Practice, Sight and the Sense of Belonging. Vergunst, J.L., & Ingold, T. (Eds.). Ways of Walking: Ethnography and Practiceon Foot (pp. 81-91). Ashgate.
• Potthoff, K. (2013). The use of ‘cultural landscape’ in 19th century German geographical literature. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift – Norwegian Journal of Geography, 67:1, 49-54. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2012.759617
• Rapoport, A. (2004). Kültür Mimarlık Tasarım (S. Batur, Çev.). İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi Yayınları. Relph, E. (1981). Rational Landscapes and Humanistic Geography. Routledge Revivals. London: Croom Helm.
• Roymans, N. (1995). The cultural biography of urnfields and long-term history of a mythical landscape. Archaeological Dialogues, 2:1, 2-38.
• Sauer, C.O. (1925). ‘The Morphology of Landscape. University of California Publications in Geography 2’, reprinted in Wiens, J. A., Moss, M. R., Turner, M. G. and Mladenoff, D. J. (Editors) (2007). Landscape Ecology (pp. 36-70), Columbia University Press.
• Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and Memory.Newyork: Vintage Books.
• Tilley, C. (1994). A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg Publisher.
• Tilley, C. (2004). The Materiality of Stone - Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology:1 (1st ed.). Berg Publishers.
• Tilley, C. (2006). Introduction: Identity, Place, Landscape and Heritage. Journal of Material Culture, Vol.11(1-2):7-32. DOI: 10.1177/1359183506062990
• UNESCO (1962). Recommendation Concerning the Safeguarding of Beauty and Character of Landscapes and Sites. The General Conference of the UNESCO. Paris: 9-12 November 1962.
• UNESCO (1972). Convention concerning the Protection Of The World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO. Paris: 17 October- 21November 1972.
• UNESCO (1994). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC 2/Revised, February 1994). UNESCO World Heritage Center. <http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/>, erişim tarihi 25.08.2024.
• UNESCO (2011). Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape, including glossary definitions. UNESCO World Heritage Center. Paris: 10.11.2011.
• UNESCO (2023). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention (WHC 23/01, 24 September 2023). UNESCO World Heritage Center. <http://whc.unesco.org/en/guidelines/>, erişim tarihi 25.12.2023.
• UNESCO & ICOMOS (1992). Report of the Expert Group on Cultural Landscapes. La Petite Pierre: 24-26 October 1992.
• Widgren, M. (1997). Landskap eller objekt: Kring kulturminnesvårdens problem att hantera landskapets historia. In Brandelsmo, J., Jones, M., Olwig, K., Widgren, M. (eds.). Landskapet som historie (pp. 5-16). NIKU Temahefte 4, NIKU Norsk institutt for kulturminneforskning.
• Widgren, M. (1999). Is landscape history possible? Or, how can we study the desertion of farms?. In Ucko, P. J. and Layton, R., (Eds.), The Archaeology and Anthropology of Landscape: Shaping Your Landscape, (pp. 95-105). London: Routledge.
• Wilkinson, T.J. (2006). The Archaeology of Landscape. In Bintliff, J. (Ed.), A Companion to Archaeology (pp. 334-356). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
• Witcher, R.E. (1999). GIS and Landscapes of Perception. In Gillings, M., Mattingly, D. and van Dalen, J, (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology (pp. 13-22). Oxford: The Alden Press.