Conference Paper

FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis

Volume: 4 Number: 1 August 30, 2022
EN

FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Since 1992, the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has been ranking senior men’s national soccer teams based on a variety of criteria. In 2003, FIFA extended the FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings into ranking senior women’s national soccer teams. The FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings published just before the 1994 FIFA World Cup USA, 1998 FIFA World Cup France, 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan, 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany, 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa, 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil, 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia, 2003 FIFA World Cup USA, 2007 FIFA World Cup China, 2011 FIFA World Cup Germany, 2015 FIFA World Cup Canada, and the 2019 FIFA World Cup France were considered. These rankings were compared to the final results of those FIFA World Cups based on two different methods of displaying the teams finish and were analyzed. Of the top 16 teams in each of the Men’s FIFA World Cups, 74.1% of those teams advanced to the Round of 16. Meanwhile, 83.9% of the top 12 teams in each of the Women’s FIFA World Cups advanced to the Round of 16 or Quarterfinals. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the Pre-Tournament rankings and final results was calculated using both ranking methods. The Women’s World Cups had higher Pearson correlation coefficients for both methods than the Men’s World Cups. In addition, the Women’s World Cups had higher t-values and z-scores than the Men’s World Cup when tested for independence and association between the Pre-Tournament rankings and final results using both ranking methods. These findings indicate that the Women’s World Cups were more predictable than Men’s World Cups based on the FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings.

Keywords

References

  1. FIFA. (2005, March 8). FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking OVERVIEW OF BASIC PRINCIPLES AND METHOD OF CALCULATION. FIFA.com the official web site of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20050308034148/http://www.fifa.com/en/mens/statistics/rank/procedures/0,2540,3,00.html
  2. FIFA. (2007, June 4). FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking Schedule. FIFA. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20070604211354/http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/ranking/procedure/men.html
  3. FIFA. (2017, January 10). Unanimous decision expands FIFA World Cup™ to 48 teams from 2026. FIFA.com. Retrieved March 26, 2022, from https://web.archive.org/web/20170110231324/http://www.fifa.com/about-fifa/news/y=2017/m=1/news=fifa-council-unanimously-decides-on-expansion-of-the-fifa-world-cuptm--2863100.html
  4. FIFA. (2018). Revision of the FIFA / Coca-Cola World Ranking. FIFA. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://digitalhub.fifa.com/m/f99da4f73212220/original/edbm045h0udbwkqew35a-pdf.pdf
  5. FIFA. (n.d.). Women's ranking. Wiegman: England's squad even better than I thought. Retrieved February 16, 2022, from https://www.fifa.com/fifa-world-ranking/women?dateId=ranking_20211210
  6. Hoffman, J. I. E. (2014). Fisher exact test. Fisher Exact Test - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. Retrieved February 17, 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/fisher-exact-test
  7. Prahl, A. (2019, June 9). 5 major differences between the men's and women's World Cups. POPSUGAR Fitness. Retrieved March 26, 2022, from https://www.popsugar.com/fitness/Differences-Between-Men-Women-Soccer-World-Cups-46145453
  8. Rahman, N. A. (1968). A Course in Theoretical Statistics. Charles Griffin and Company.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Software Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Conference Paper

Publication Date

August 30, 2022

Submission Date

August 2, 2022

Acceptance Date

August 27, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 4 Number: 1

APA
Joly, B., Stojsavljevic, T., & Dik, M. (2022). FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences, 4(1), 31-58. https://doi.org/10.47086/pims.1153373
AMA
1.Joly B, Stojsavljevic T, Dik M. FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis. PIMS. 2022;4(1):31-58. doi:10.47086/pims.1153373
Chicago
Joly, Brandon, Tom Stojsavljevic, and Mehmet Dik. 2022. “FIFA/Coca-Cola/World/Rankings/on/the/Predictability/of/the/Men’s/and/Women’s/FIFA/World/Cup:/A/Comparative/Analysis”. Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences 4 (1): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.47086/pims.1153373.
EndNote
Joly B, Stojsavljevic T, Dik M (August 1, 2022) FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis. Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences 4 1 31–58.
IEEE
[1]B. Joly, T. Stojsavljevic, and M. Dik, “FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis”, PIMS, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–58, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.47086/pims.1153373.
ISNAD
Joly, Brandon - Stojsavljevic, Tom - Dik, Mehmet. “FIFA/Coca-Cola/World/Rankings/on/the/Predictability/of/the/Men’s/and/Women’s/FIFA/World/Cup:/A/Comparative/Analysis”. Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences 4/1 (August 1, 2022): 31-58. https://doi.org/10.47086/pims.1153373.
JAMA
1.Joly B, Stojsavljevic T, Dik M. FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis. PIMS. 2022;4:31–58.
MLA
Joly, Brandon, et al. “FIFA/Coca-Cola/World/Rankings/on/the/Predictability/of/the/Men’s/and/Women’s/FIFA/World/Cup:/A/Comparative/Analysis”. Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, Aug. 2022, pp. 31-58, doi:10.47086/pims.1153373.
Vancouver
1.Brandon Joly, Tom Stojsavljevic, Mehmet Dik. FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings on the Predictability of the Men’s and Women’s FIFA World Cup: A Comparative Analysis. PIMS. 2022 Aug. 1;4(1):31-58. doi:10.47086/pims.1153373
Creative Commons License
The published articles in PIMS are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.