Development of an Information System for Storing Digitized Works of the Almaty Academgorodok Research Institutes

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 32 - 37, 15.06.2021

Nurlan Temirbekov Dossan Baigereyev Almas Temirbekov Bakytzhan Omirzhanova

https://doi.org/10.47086/pims.613534

Öz

The present article describes the architecture of the integrated distributed information system created for storing digitized works of employees of Almaty Akademgorodok research institutes (Kazakhstan) and providing access to them using Web technology. Comparative analysis of two data storage systems for storing digitized works, Ceph and GlusterFS, is provided. The description of the software part of the information system is provided which consists of four subsystems: repository of digital objects, subsystem for managing current research information, subsystem of integration of distributed information resources, subsystem of access to distributed information resources based on Web technologies. The relation between the subsystems and their integration is described. The work defines the requirements to the repository of digital objects. The requirements for the repository of digital objects are defined; a comparative analysis of open source software used for these purposes is made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

integrated distributed information system, data storage, Ceph, GlusterFS, digital object repository, DSpace, CRIS, web portal

Destekleyen Kurum

Science Committee of Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Proje Numarası

AP05131806

Teşekkür

This research was supported by Science Committee of Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant No. AP05131806).

Kaynakça

• A. D'Atri, and V. Bhembre, and K. Singh, Learning Ceph - Second Edition: Unifed, scalable, and reliable open source storage solution (2017).
• I. T. Avery, Glusterfs (2012).
• H. Franchke, and J. Gamalielsson, and B. Lundell, Institutional repositories as infrastructures for long-term preservations, Information Research 22, nr 757 (2016) 1-27.
• C. Hippenhammer, Comparing institutional repository software: pampering metadata uploaders, The Christian Librarian 59, nr 1 (2016) 1-6.
• K. Baughman McDowell, Institutional repositories in the Czech republic, Gleeson Library Librarians Research 10 (2016) 1-29.
• M. N. Ravikumar, and T. Ramanan, Comparison of greenstone digital library and DSpace: Experiences from digital library initiatives at eastern university, Sri Lanka, Journal of University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka 18, nr 2 (2014) 76–90.
• M. Castagné, Institutional repository software comparison: DSpace, ePrints, Digital Commons, Islandora and Hydra (Report), University of British Columbia (2013).
• R. Cullen, and B. Chawner, Institutional repositories in New Zealand: comparing institutional strategies for digital preservation and discovery, Proceedings of the IATUL Conference 18 (2008) 1-11.
• O. L. Zhizhimov, and A. M. Fedotov, and O. A. Fedotova, Building a typical model of an information system for working with documents on scientific heritage, Bulletin of the NSU. Information Technology 10, nr 3 (2012) 5-14.