This article analyses the attempts made, since 1986, to maintain that the“documents” published in 1920 by Aram Andonian are probably, if not almostcertainly, “authentic”. A systematic checking of the assertions defendingAndonian’s work proves that these attempts are not less misleading than the bookwhich they support. Andonian’s forgeries served for dec
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Journal Section | Research Article |
Publication Date | May 1, 2011 |
Published in Issue | Year 2011 Issue: 23 |