Resignation and Resilience: Bridging Effective Teaching to the Impacts of Complex and Layered School Culture

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between teacher efficacy, leadership, and how they intersect with complex and layered school system dynamics. Using the Listening Guide Method for Qualitative Inquiry (the Listening Guide, Gilligan, 1993), teacher interviews are examined, resulting in thematic expressions of resignation or resilience. These qualitative data revealed that effective classroom teachers can overcome the limitations of existing bureaucratic structures through resilience anchored in individual self-efficacy. Teacher resilience, anchored in demonstrated self-efficacy, played a major role in teachers’ in-classroom experiences and ability to successfully navigate a complex and layered school system dynamics.

Keywords

• The Listening Guide
• theory-driven classroom interventions
• teacher first-person interviews
• bureaucratic school culture

References

1. Alavi, S. B., & McCormick, J. (2016). Implications of proxy efficacy for studies of team leadership in organizational settings. European Psychologist, 21(3), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000270
2. Alexander, K.L. (1997). Public schools and the public good. Social Forces, 76(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200202
3. Alqarni, S. (2020). A sociolinguistic investigation of compliments and compliment responses among young Saudis. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.18
4. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). How to tame the wild tongue. Borderlands- La Frontera: The new mestiza. (1st ed., pp. 53-65). Aunt Lute Books. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003206255
5. Apple, M. W. (Ed.). (2012). Introduction. Knowledge, power, and education. (1st ed., pp. 33-48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118115
6. Balicki, A., & Aypay, A. (2018). An investigation of school principalship in the context of bureaucracy Electronic Turkish Studies, 13(11), 1535-1560. https://doi.org/10.7827/turkishstudies.13395
7. Ball, S. J. (1993). Education policy, power relations and teachers’ work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.1993.9973954
8. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191

9. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
10. Bandura, A. (1997). The anatomy of stages of change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8
11. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
12. Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Annual Review of Education, Communication & Language Sciences, 7, 23-40. https://research.ncl.ac.uk/media/sites/researchwebsites/arecls/bayram_vol7.pdf
13. Benight, C. C., & Cieslak, R. (2011). Cognitive factors and resilience: how self-efficacy contributes to coping with. S.M. Southwick, B.T. Litz, C. Charney, & M. Friedman (Eds.) Resilience and Mental health: Challenges across the Lifespan, Cambridge University Press. (1st ed., pp. 45-55). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511994791.005
14. Blackmore, J. (2013). A feminist critical perspective on educational leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(2), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2012.754057
15. Boyles, D. (2018). Corporate Culture and Schools. American Education and Corporations, 41–60. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457579-2
16. Brown, L. M., & Gilligan, C. (1993). Meeting at the Crossroads: Women’s Psychology and Girls’ Development. Feminism & Psychology, 3(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0959353593031002
17. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Psychological Medicine, 22(2), 531–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700030555
18. Bruner, M. L. (2003). Strategies of remembrance: The rhetorical dimensions of national identity construction. Choice Reviews Online, 40(10), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6043
19. Bush, T. (2011). The micropolitics of educational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 642-645. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/1741143211424559
20. Bush, T. (2015). Understanding instructional leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 487-489. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215577035
21. Bush, T. (2020). Knowledge production in educational leadership and management: Broadening the base. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 207–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219894118
22. Cherniss, C. (1993). The role of profesional self-efficacy in the etiology and ameloriation of burnout. In W.B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, & T. Marck, (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent development in theory and research, (1st ed., pp.135–149). Routeldge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227979-11
23. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed., pp. 73- 84). Sage Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
24. Daniilidou, A., Platsidou, M., & Gonida, E. (2020). Primary school teachers resilience: association with teacher self-efficacy, burnout and stress. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 18(52), 549-582. https://doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v18i52.3487
25. Day, C. (2013). The new lives of teachers. In C. Day & J.C.K. Lee (Eds.), Back to the future, (1st ed., pp. 57–74). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-240-2_4
26. Demirbolat, O. A. (2010). Bureaucratic socialization and educational institutions. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 1(2), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.14527/c1s2m5
27. Demirbolat, A. O., Kalkan, F., & Dağli, E. (2014). The relationship between teachers’ bureaucratic structure and collective efficacy perceptions. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(5), 987–999. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.859758
28. Durnali, M.& Akbasli, S., Okan, D. İ. Ş., (2020). İlkokul öğretmenlerinin karşılaştıkları yıldırma davranışları ile motivasyon düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 49, 564–581. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.596426
29. Eg, J., & Chang, A. S. C. (2010). How resilient are our graduate trainee teachers in Singapore? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v19i2.1600
30. Eppard, R. G. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership styles as they predict constructive culture and defensive culture [Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University], 67-92. Virginia Polytechnic Institute Digital Archive. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/11112/DissertationFinalDocument.pdf?sequence=2
31. Friedman, I. A., & Kass, E. (2002). Teacher self-efficacy: a classroom-organization conceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(6), 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(02)00027-6
32. Friend (2016), M. (2016). Welcome to co-teaching 2.0. Educational Leadership, 73(4), 16-22. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/welcome-to-co-teaching-2.0
33. Friend, Marilyn, and L. Cook. (2007). Co-teaching. Interactions: Collaboration skills for professionals (7th ed.) Pearson, 39-40. https://ebin.pub/interactions-collaboration-skills-for-school-professionals-seventh-edition-pearson-new-international_edition-1292041676-1269374508-9781292041674-9781269374507.html
34. Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535380
35. Garofalo, M. A. (2019). Understanding the Co-Teaching Experience of Teachers: Negotiating Choice and Efficacy. (Publication No. 2684)[Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University], 35-93. https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3772&context=dissertations
36. Garofalo, M.A.; Graziano, M. J. (2022) Administrative motives in a complex and layered environment school culture. [Unpublished manuscript]. Department of Educational Leadership, Kean University. Gibbs, S. R. (2009). Exploring the influence of task-specific self-efficacy on opportunity recognition perceptions and behaviors. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(6), 1. https://www.academia.edu/2363821EXPLORING_THE_INFLUENCE_OF_TASK_SPECIFIC_SELF_EFFICACY_ON_OPPORTUNITY_RECOGNITION_PERCEPTIONS_AND_BEHAVIORS
37. Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569
38. Gilligan, C. (1989). Teaching Shakespeare’s sister: Notes from the underground of female adolescence. In C. Gilligan, N.P. Lyons, & T.J. Hanmer (Eds.). Making connections, the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. (pp. 6-29). Harvard University Press. https://nyuscholars.nyu.edu/en/publications/teaching-shakespeares-sister-notes-from-the-underground-of-female
39. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press, (pp. 12-42). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674037618
40. Gilligan, C. (2015). The Listening Guide method of psychological inquiry. Qualitative Psychology, 2(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000023
41. Gilligan, C., & Eddy, J. (2017). Listening as a path to psychological discovery: An introduction to the Listening Guide. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6(2), 76-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0335-3
42. Gilligan, C., Spencer, R., Weinberg, M. C., & Bertsch, T. (2006). On the Listening Guide: A voice centered rational method. Emergent methods in Social Research, (pp. 253–272). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984034.n12
43. Giroux, H. A. (1999). Schools for sale: Public education, corporate culture, and the citizen-consumer. The Educational Forum, 63(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131729908984404
44. Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 479-507. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
45. Graziano, M. J., & Pelc, N. (2020). Learning doesn’t occur in rows: An immersive model for teaching gender. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000164
46. Graziano, M. J., Okazaki, S., Chun, G., & Barnes, S. P. (2018). Identities of accommodation; identities of resistance: Korean American women and meaning making during and post college. Narrative Inquiry, 28(1), 75-93. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17018.gra
47. Green, P. (2022). Safeguarding children in England. BJM. o1760. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1760
48. Gschwend, L. L. (1999). How do high-efficacy teachers persist in low collective efficacy environments? [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California], 12-69. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
49. Gu, Q. (2014). The role of relational resilience in teachers’ career-long commitment and effectiveness. Teachers and Teaching, 20(5), 502-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.937961
50. Guidetti, G., Viotti, S., Bruno, A., & Converso, D. (2018). Teachers’ work ability: A study of relationships between collective efficacy and self-efficacy beliefs. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 197-206. https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s157850
51. Gunter, H. M. (2012). The field of educational administration in England. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(4), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2012.729664
52. Hallinger, P. (2011). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x10383412
53. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Management Theory, Research and Practice. Ankara: Nobel Printing Distribution, 56-82.
54. Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969334
55. Kahveci, T. C., Uygun, Ö., Yurtsever, U., & Ilyas, S. (2012). Quality assurance in higher education institutions using strategic information systems. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.490
56. Karadag, E. (2020). The effect of educational leadership on students’ achievement: A cross-cultural meta-analysis research on studies between 2008 and 2018. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09612-1
57. Kellerman, B. (2012, August 10). Cut off at the pass: The limits of leadership in the 21st century. Governance Studies at Brookings Institution, 1-11. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0810_leadership_deficit_kellerman.pdf
58. Klassen, R. M., Tze, V., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
59. Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Teacher efficacy in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.007
60. Kurt, T., Duyar, I., & Calik, T. (2012). Are We Legitimate Yet?: A closer look at the casual relationship mechanisms among principal leadership, teacher self- efficacy and collective efficacy. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211191014
61. Labaree, D. F. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 39-81. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312034001039
62. Levitt, H. M., Morrill, Z., Collins, K. M., & Rizo, J. L. (2021). The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 357. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000523
63. Lumby, J., & Foskett, N. (2011). Power, risk, and utility: Interpreting the landscape of culture in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x11400187
64. Macrine, S. L. (Ed.). (2020). Critical pedagogy in uncertain times: Hope and possibilities. Springer Nature, 45-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39808-8
65. Mayerson, D. R. (2010). The relationship between school climate, trust, enabling structures, and perceived school effectiveness. [Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, School of Education and Human Services], 12-56. https://www.proquest.com/openview/a41a7ca696373ec139ab3f9693701570/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
66. Mehta, J. (2013). From bureaucracy to profession: Remaking the educational sector for the twenty-first century. Harvard Educational Review, 83(3), 463-488. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.3.kr08797621362v05
67. Meier, K. J., Polinard, J. L., & Wrinkle, R. D. (2000). Bureaucracy and organizational performance: Causality arguments about public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 590-602. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669266
68. Mette, I. (2020). Reflections on supervision in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Educational Supervision, 3(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.3.3.1
69. Minckler, C. H. (2014). School leadership that builds teacher social capital. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213510502
70. Mouzelis, N. (2001). Reflexive modernization and the third way: the impasses of Giddens’ social-democratic politics. The Sociological Review, 49(3), 436-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954x.00340
71. Müller, H.-P., & Sigmund, S. (2020). Person und werk. Max Weber-Handbuch: Leben-Werk-Wirkung. (pp. 3–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05142-4_1
72. Ngui, G. K., & Lay, Y. F. (2020). The effect of emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, subjective well-being and resilience on student teachers' perceived practicum stress: A Malaysian case study. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.277
73. Neal, Z. P., & Watling Neal, J. (2012). The public school as a public good: Direct and indirect pathways to community satisfaction. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(5), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00595.x
74. Niesche, R., & Gowlett, C. (2019). Critical perspectives in educational leadership: A new ‘theory turn’? Educational leadership theory, (pp. 145-158). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8241-3_2
75. Niesche, R., & Thomson, P. (2017). Freedom to what ends?—School autonomy in neoliberal times. The Wiley International Handbook of Educational Leadership, (pp.193–206). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118956717.ch11
76. Pashiardis, P., & Johansson, O. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding the impact of successful and effective school leadership as practiced. Successful school leadership: International perspectives. (pp. 193-209). Bloomsbury Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474270984
77. Patterson, J. L., Goens, G. A., & Reed, D. E. (2009). Efficacy and resilient leadership. Resilient leadership for turbulent times: A guide to thriving in the face of adversity. (1st ed., pp. 57-71). R&L Education.
78. Peixoto, F., Wosnitza, M., Pipa, J., Morgan, M., & Cefai, C. (2018). A multidimensional view on pre-service teacher resilience in Germany, Ireland, Malta and Portugal. In Resilience in education (pp. 73-89). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76690-4_5
79. Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: an insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 46-57. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
80. Perlow, L., & Williams, S. (2003). Is silence killing your company? IEEE Engineering Management Review, 31(4), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2003.24935
81. Pollock, A. M. (2020). Covid-19: local implementation of tracing and testing programmes could enable some schools to reopen. bmj, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1187
82. Purcell-Gates, V. (2000, July). The role of qualitative and ethnographic research in educational policy, Reading Online, 4(1). 1-7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED444121.pdf
83. Raider-Roth, M. B. (2004). Taking the time to think: A portrait of reflection. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry & Reflective Practice, 18(3), 1. https://commons.und.edu/tl-nirp-journal/vol18/iss3/1
84. Reed, D. E., & Blaine, B. (2015). Resilient women educational leaders in turbulent times: Applying the Leader Resilience Profile® to assess women's leaderships strengths. Planning & Changing, 46(3/4), 459-468. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=552157626008
85. Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 29(3), 798-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/20054196
86. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092976
87. Ruçlar, K. (2013). Örgüt kültürü ve örgütsel sessizlik arasındaki ilişki: Sakarya Üniversitesi örneği [Master’s thesis, Sakarya Üniversitesi], 30-89. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12619/74760
88. Saglam, A. C. (2016). The effects of vocational high school teachers' perceived trust on organizational silence. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(5), 225-232. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i5.1474
89. Santoli, S. P., Sachs, J., Romey, E. A., & McClurg, S. (2008). A successful formula for middle school inclusion: Collaboration, time, and administrative support. RMLE Online, 32(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2008.11462055
90. Schwarzer, R., & Warner, L. M. (2013). Perceived self-efficacy and its relationship to resilience. In Resilience in children, adolescents, and adults: The Springer Series on human exceptionality. (pp.139-150). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10
91. Shaker, P., & Ruitenberg, C. (2007). ‘Scientifically-based research’: the art of politics and the distortion of science. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 30(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701383545
92. Shaturaev, J. & Bekimbetova, G. (2021). The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. InterConf, (88), 3-12. https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/interconf/article/view/16429
93. Sinden, J., Hoy, W.K., & Sweetland, S.R. (2004). An analysis of enabling school structure. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230410544071
94. Taylor, J. M., Gilligan, C., & Sullivan, A. M. (1997). Between voice and silence: Women and girls, race and relationship. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 883–885. https://doi.org/10.1086/231010
95. Tienken, C. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2015). Introduction. Education policy perils. (1st ed., pp.1-5). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315708713
96. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1
97. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
98. Veiskarami, H. A., Ghadampour, E., & Mottaghinia, M. R. (2017). Interactions among school climate, collective self-efficacy, and personal self-efficiency: Evidence from education institutions. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 481-488.
99. Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (1986). Teachers’ sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement. In Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (Eds.) Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement, (1st ed., pp. 125-144). Longman. https://www.worldcat.org/title/12081107
100. Wooten, K.C. &White, J. F. (1989). Toward a theory of change role efficacy. Human Relations, 42(8), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678904200801
101. Woodcock, C. (2016). The Listening Guide: A how-to approach on ways to promote educational democracy. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916677594
102. Weber, M. (2016). Bureaucracy. In Social theory re-wired, (2nd ed. pp. 311–316). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357-41
103. Zengin, H. B. M. M. (2011). İlköğretim okullarında örgütsel güvene ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 211-228. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/146259
104. Zoller, U. (1999). Scaling-up of higher-order cognitive skills-oriented college chemistry teaching: An action-oriented research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 36(5), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(199905)36:5<583::aid-tea5>3.0.co;2-m