The Effects of Regulations on Private School Choice Program Participation: Experimental Evidence from the United States

Abstract

Private school leaders weigh costs and benefits when deciding whether to participate in school voucher programs. Regulatory costs associated with accepting voucher funding could reduce private school leaders’ willingness to participate. We test this hypothesis through the first random assignment analysis of the effects of various regulations on the expressed willingness of private school leaders to participate in hypothetical voucher programs that draws upon national data. We randomly assign different regulations to U.S. private school leaders and ask them whether they would participate in a hypothetical school voucher program during the following school year. Relative to no regulations, we find that open-enrollment mandates reduce the likelihood that private school leaders report being certain to participate in a hypothetical choice program by about 14 percentage points, or 67%. The requirement that private schools accept the voucher funding amount as payment-in-full reduces the likelihood that private school leaders report being certain to participate by 16 percentage points, or 77%. Some regulations are more likely to deter private schools with higher reported tuitions, higher enrollment trends, more specialization, and more climate problems.

Keywords

• private school
• school choice
• regulation
• survey experiment
• school vouchers
• school supply

Thanks

This project was supported in part by the Charles Koch Foundation.

References

1. Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2018). Free to choose: can school choice reduce student achievement? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(1), 175-206.
2. American Federation of Teachers (n.d.). Private school vouchers don’t help kids. https://www.aft.org/private-school-vouchers-dont-help-kids
3. Austin, M. J. (2015). Schools’ responses to voucher policy: Participation decisions and early implementation experiences in the Indiana Choice Scholarship Program. Journal of School Choice, 9(3), 354-379.
4. Austin, M. (2019). Organizational and social costs of schools' participation in a voucher program. In M. Berends, R. J. Waddington, & J. Schoenig (Eds.), School choice at the crossroads research perspectives (pp. 30-51). New York City, NY: Routledge.
5. Barnum, M. 2017. To Test or Not to Test: As Tax Credit Scholarships Expand, Questions About Accountability and Outcomes. The 74 Million. https://www.the74million.org/article/to-test-or-not-to-test-as-tax-credit-scholarships-expand-questions-about-accountability-and-outcomes/
6. Bedrick, J. (2016). The folly of overregulating school choice. Education Next. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/the-folly-of-overregulating-school-choice/
7. Bettinger, E., Kremer, M., Kugler, M., Medina, C., Posso, C., & Saavedra, J. E. (2019). School Vouchers, Labor Markets and Vocational Education. Borradores de Economía. Retrieved from http://banrep.gov.co/en/school-vouchers-labor-markets-and-vocational-education
8. Burke, L. M. (2016). Avoiding the “inexorable push toward homogenization” in school choice: Education savings accounts as hedges against institutional isomorphism. The Journal of School Choice, 10(4), 560-578.

9. Cheng, A., Henderson, M., Peterson, P.E., and M.R. West (2019). Public Support Climbs for Teacher Pay, School Expenditures, Charter Schools, and Universal Vouchers: Results from the 2018 EdNext Poll. Education Next, Winter, 8-26.
10. DeAngelis, C. A. (2020). Regulatory compliance costs and private school participation in voucher programs. Journal of School Choice, 14(1), 95-121.
11. DeAngelis, C. A., & Burke, L. M. (2017). Does regulation induce homogenisation? An analysis of three voucher programmes in the United States. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(7-8), 311-327.
12. DeAngelis, C. A., & Burke, L. M. (2019). Does regulation reduce specialization? Examining the impact of regulations on private schools of choice in five locations. EdChoice Working Paper No. 2019-1. Retrieved from https://www.edchoice.org/research/does-regulation-reduce-specialization/
13. DeAngelis, C. A., Burke, L. M., & Wolf, P. J. (2019). The effects of regulations on private school choice program participation: Experimental evidence from Florida. Social Science Quarterly, 100(6), 2316-36. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12689
14. DeAngelis, C. A., Burke, L. M., & Wolf, P. J. (2020). When Being Regulated is a Choice: The Impact of Government Policies on Private School Participation in Voucher Programs. Journal of School Choice.
15. DeAngelis, C. A., & Dills, A. K. (2019). Is School Choice a “Trojan Horse?” The Effects of School Choice Laws on Homeschool Prevalence. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(3), 342-354.
16. DeAngelis, C. A., & Hoarty, B. (2018). Who participates? An analysis of school participation decisions in two voucher programs in the United States. Cato Institute Policy Analysis No. 848.
17. EdChoice (2023) The ABCs of School Choice: The Comprehensive Guide to Every Private School Choice Program in America. Available: https://www.edchoice.org/research-library/?report=the-abcs-of-school-choice#report
18. Education Commission of the States (ECS). (2021) 50-State Comparison: Voucher Amounts. March. Accessed 9/14/2022 from: https://reports.ecs.org/comparisons/vouchers-06
19. Egalite, A.J., Stallings, D.T., Dinehart, T., Meneses, F., Singh, L., & Whalen, V. (2018). School leaders’ voices: Private school leaders’ perspectives on the North Carolina Opportunity Scholarship Program, 2018 Update. OS Evaluation Report #6. Retrieved from https://ced.ncsu.edu/elphd/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/10/School-Leaders-Voices.pdf
20. Harris, D. (2015). The reform debate, part II: The difference between charter and voucher schools. Education Week. Retrieved from https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/urban_education_lessons_from_new_orleans/2015/11/the_reform_family_debate_part_ii_regulation_affects_charter_schools_and_voucher_schools_differently.html
21. Hess, F. M. (2010). Does school choice “work”. National Affairs, 5(1), 35–53.
22. Lee, M. H., Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2020). Heterogeneous Achievement Impacts across Schools in the Louisiana Scholarship Program. Journal of School Choice, 14(2), 228-253.
23. McShane, M. Q. (2018). Rethinking regulation: Overseeing performance in a diversifying educational ecosystem. EdChoice. National Center of Education Statistics (NCES) (2021) Digest of Education Statistics Table 235.10. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/dige st/d21/tables/dt21_235.10.asp?current=yes
24. Parents’ Campaign Research & Education Fund (2017, November 30). Vouchers do not guarantee admission to private schools. https://tpcref.org/vouchers-do-not-guarantee-admission-to-private-schools/
25. Prothero, Arianna. (2017). ‘There is no oversight’: Private school vouchers can leave parents on their own. Education Week, November 14. https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/there-is-no-oversight-private-school-vouchers-can-leave-parents-on-their-own/2017/11
26. Sánchez, C. (2018). Understanding school competition under voucher regimes. Retrieved from http://econweb.umd.edu/~sanchez/files/csanchez_jmp.pdf
27. Smart, J. C. (1988). College Influences on Graduates’ Income Levels. Research in Higher Education, 29(1), 41–59. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40195878
28. Stuit, D., & Doan, S. (2013). School choice regulations: Red tape or red herring? Washington, D.C.: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
29. Sude, Y., DeAngelis, C. A., & Wolf, P. J. (2018). Supplying choice: An analysis of school participation decisions in voucher programs in Washington, DC, Indiana, and Louisiana. Journal of School Choice, 12(1), 8-33.
30. Zhang, L. (2005). Do Measures of College Quality Matter? The Effect of College Quality on Graduates' Earnings. The Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 571-596.