Navigating the Covid 19 Turbulence in Higher Education: Evidence from Turkish Faculty Members

Abstract

Covid19 was the first pandemic of the modern era to strike with such virulence. We sought to understand this recent phenomenon and contribute to the empirical findings on the expectations from HEI leadership and management in Turkey. Drawing on the Turbulence Theory, we explored how the academic staff experienced the initial phase of the pandemic in Turkey and how they perceived the HE leaders’ navigation of the crisis at the selected universities. Within qualitative phenomonology, data from semi-structured interviews with a convenient sample of 10 academic staff in five public and five private universities in Turkey, was analysed through content analysis. Findings highlighted the opportunities and challenges of the pandemic for the faculty at personal and organizational level in an intersectional pattern. Moreover, the ways HEI leaders navigated the crisis created binaries in the form of experience vs. inexperience and trust vs. distrust. The challenges derived from the rapid but ineffective decision-making processes and the heightened surveillance mechanisms over the academic staff; which in some cases resulted in lack of trust. Hence, the turbulence level was shaped by how the universities and their leaders addressed it. In such cases, practices of building trustworthy connections, more distributive forms of leadership and robust communication; which would help the leaders to navigate the turbulence at times of crises are significant. Further recommendations are provided for research, policy and practice.

Keywords

• Pandemic
• higher education
• leadership
• faculty members
• turbulence
• Turkey

References

1. Agasisti, T., & Soncin, M. (2021). Higher education in troubled times: on the impact of Covid-19 in Italy. Studies in Higher Education, 46(1), 86-95.
2. Altbach, P. G., & de Wit, H. (2020). Postpandemic outlook for higher education is bleakest for the poorest. International Higher Education, 102 Specıal Issue, 3-5.
3. Ansell, C., & Trondal, J. (2018). Governing turbulence: An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on public management and governance, 1(1), 43-57.
4. Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems. Public Management Review, 1-12. doi.org/10.1080/14719037. 2020.1820272
5. Baer, L., & Duin, A. H. (2020). 'Smart change' for turbulent times. Planning for Higher Education, 48(3), 53-62.
6. Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2020). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-126.
7. Davis, H., & Jones, S. (2014). The work of leadership in higher education management. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(4), 367-370.
8. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, England and New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.

9. Drew, G. (2010). Issues and challenges in higher education leadership: Engaging for change. The Australian educational researcher, 37(3), 57-76.
10. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human relations, 18(1), 21-32.
11. Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic leadership in a time of crisis: The coronavirus and COVID‐19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 39-45.
12. Garretson, C. J., McCormack, T. J., Waller, R. E., Lemoine, P. A., & Richardson, M. D. (2021). The Impact Of Turbulence On Global Higher Education During A Pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 8(1), 30-35.
13. Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118-137.
14. Gurr, D., & Drysdale, L. (2020). Leadership for challenging times. International Studies in Educational Administration, 48(1), 24-30.
15. Goode, H., McGennisken, R., & Rutherford, E. (2021). An Adaptive Leadership Response to Unprecedented Change. CCEAM, 36.
16. Gross, S. J. (2020). Applying turbulence theory to educational leadership in challenging times. New York, NY: Routledge.
17. Gross, J. (2016). Using turbulence theory as a metaphor in a volatile world. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University.
18. Gross, S. J., & Shapiro, J. P. (2004). Using Multiple Ethical Paradigms and Turbulence Theory in Response to Administrative Dilemmas. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 47-62.
19. Gross, S.J. (1998) Staying Centered: curriculum leadership in a turbulent era. Alexandria: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Harris, A. (2020). COVID-19–school leadership in crisis? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4),321-326. Karadağ, E., & Yücel, C. (2020). Yeni tip Koronavirüs pandemisi döneminde üniversitelerde uzaktan eğitim: Lisans öğrencileri kapsamında bir değerlendirme çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(2), 181-192.
21. Karademir, A., Yaman, F., & Saatçioglu, Ö. (2020). Challenges of Higher Education Institutions against COVID-19: The Case of Turkey. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 453-474.
22. Karakose, T. (2021). Emergency remote teaching due to COVID-19 pandemic and potential risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged students in higher education. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(3), 53-62.
23. Kerres, M. (2020). Against all odds: Education in Germany coping with Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2 (3), 690–694.
24. Marioni, G., Van’t land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world: IAU Global Survey Report. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid-19_regional_perspectives_on_the_impact_of_covid-19_on_he_july_2020_.pdf
25. Marshall, J., Roache, D., & Moody-Marshall, R. (2020). Crisis leadership: A critical examination of educational leadership in higher education in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. CCEAM, 30.
26. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (2012). Designing qualitative research (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, Cal.: Sage Publications.
27. Netolicky, D. M. (2021). School leadership during a pandemic: navigating tensions. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. 5 (3–4): 391–395. doi:10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0017
28. Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design, and skills. Sage Publications.
29. Samoilovich, D. (2020). Leadership in the Time of COVID-19: Reflections of Latin American Higher Education Leaders. International Higher Education, 102, 32-34.
30. Saxena, S. K. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19). Singapore: Springer.
31. Saraç, Y. (2020). Preparing a national roadmap for online higher education. University World News.
32. Tourish, D. (2020). Introduction to the special issue: Why the coronavirus crisis is also a crisis of leadership. Leadership, 16(3), 261-272.
33. Yokuş, G. (2022). Developing a guiding model of educational leadership in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A grounded theory study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 362-387.
34. Zhang, F., Welch, E. W., & Miao, Q. (2018). Public organization adaptation to extreme events: Mediating role of risk perception. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(3), 371–387