“Navigating Uncharted Waters”: New Teacher Mentoring and Induction

Abstract

Teacher attrition, a startling problem internationally, can be fruitfully disrupted with comprehensive mentoring/ induction in place. The purpose of this study was to describe a division-wide, systems-embedded mentoring/ induction program in three US elementary schools that determined key features/practices influencing experience during a crisis. Research questions were: How do elementary practitioners involved in a mentoring/induction program describe it? What was the perceived effect of COVID-19 on this program? Support–Accessibility–Collaboration (SAC) provided leverage as program features for new teacher professional development and retention. A theoretical framework, SAC adds to school-based mentoring research by offering an integration of key elements in the literature. In 2021, mentor teachers, principals, and new teachers in northeast Virginia completed a demographics survey and participated in interviews. The analyzed data produced seven specific findings and three program features influencing mentoring quality and stakeholders’ experience. The issue of equity in mentoring contexts is raised. As concluded, mentoring proved problematic, with variability in quality. Even in an emergency, there was movement toward comprehensive approaches that support novices.

Keywords

• division-wide systems-embedded mentoring/induction program
• new teachers
• Support–Accessibility–Collaboration (SAC)

References

1. Bullough, R. V. (2012). Mentoring and new teacher induction in the United States: A review and analysis of current practices. Mentoring & Tutoring, 20(1), 57–74.
2. Carver-Thomas, D. (2018). Diversifying the teaching profession: How to recruit and retain teachers of color. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/diversifying-teaching-profession
3. Ehrich, L. C., Hansford, B., & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40 (4), 518-540.
4. Furlow, G. (2019). All new teachers need mentoring programs. TeacherReady. Retrieved from https://www.teacherready.org/new-teachers-mentoring-programs
5. Galloway, M. K., & Ishimaru, A. M. (2015). Radical recentering: Equity in educational leadership standards. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 372–408.
6. Goldrick, L., Osta, D., Barlin, D., & Burn, J. (2012). Review of state policies on teacher induction. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/71357418.pdf
7. Goldrick, L. (2016). Support from the start: A 50-state review of policies on new educator induction and mentoring. Retrieved from https://studentsatthecenterhub.org/resource/support-from-the-start-a-50-state-review-of-policies-on-new-educator-induction-and-mentoring
8. Greenberg, M. T., Brown, J. L., & Abenavoli, R. M. (2016). Teacher stress and health. Retrieved from https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2016/07/teacher-stress-and-health.html

9. Harmsen, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R., & van Veen, K. (2019). The longitudinal effects of induction on beginning teachers’ stress. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 259–287.
10. Haverback, H. R. (2020). Middle level teachers quarantine, teach, and increase self-efficacy beliefs: Using theory to build practice during COVID-19. Middle Grades Review, 6(2), 1–6.
11. Hobson, A. J. (2021). Bringing mentoring ONSIDE: Averting judgementoring and enhancing the professional learning, development, and well-being of teachers. In E. H. Reames & L. J. Searby (Eds.), The art and science of mentoring (pp. 49–74). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
12. Hudson, P. (2012). How can schools support beginning teachers? A call for timely induction and mentoring for effective teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 71–84.
13. Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2011). Recruitment, retention, and the minority teacher shortage. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1232&context=gse_pubs
14. Ingersoll, R. M., & Smith, T. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter? NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40.
15. Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81 (2), 201–233. Kardos, S. M., & Johnson, S. M. (2010). New teachers’ experiences of mentoring: The good, the bad, and the inequity. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 23–44.
16. Kearney, S. (2019). The challenges of beginning teacher induction: A collective case study. Teaching Education, 32(2), 142–158.
17. Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 608–625.
18. Kratochwill, T. R., DeRoos, R., & Blair, S. (2011). Classroom management module. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/classroom-mgmt.aspx
19. Lopez, A. E. (2013). Collaborative mentorship: A mentoring approach to support and sustain teachers for equity and diversity. Mentoring & Tutoring, 21(3), 292–311.
20. Mathews, J. (2011, December 18). New teacher decries lesson plan gap. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/class-struggle/post/new-teacher-decries-lesson-plan-gap/2011/12/17/gIQAt0C50O_blog.html
21. Middleton, K. V. (2020). The longer-term impact of COVID-19 on K–12 student learning and assessment. Educational Measurement, 39(3), 41–44.
22. Mullen, C. A., Fitzhugh, G. II, & Hobson, A. J. (2022). District-wide mentoring: Using Kram’s model to support educators. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 58(1), 26–31.
23. Mullen, C. A., & Badger, S. C. (in press). Leadership support in pandemic: Middle school teacher perceptions of emergency remote teaching. Research in Middle Level Education.
24. National Education Association. (2022). Supporting teacher induction and mentoring programs in light of COVID-19. Retrieved from https://www.nea.org/professional-excellence/student-engagement/tools-tips/supporting-teacher-induction-and-mentoring
25. National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders. Retrieved from https://www.npbea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Professional-Standards-for-Educational-Leaders_2015.pdf
26. New Teacher Center. (2007). The costs and benefits of a comprehensive induction program. Research Brief. Retrieved from https://www.gwaea.org/app/uploads/sites/19/2021/08/BRF.pdf
27. New Teacher Center. (2018a). High quality mentoring and instructional coaching practices. Resource. Retrieved from https://newteachercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/High-Quality-Mentoring-Instructional-Coaching-Practices_RB21.pdf
28. New Teacher Center. (2018b). Mentor practice standards. Retrieved from https://newteachercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Mentor-Practice-Standards_ RB21.pdf
29. Rigby, J. G., & Tredway, L. (2015). Actions matter: How school leaders enact equity principles. In M. Khalifa, N. Witherspoon Arnold, A. F. Osanloo, & C. M. Grant (Eds.), Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 329–347). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Sasson, I., Kalir, D., & Malkinson, N. (2020). The role of pedagogical practices in novice teachers’ work. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 457–469.
31. Smith, T., & Ingersoll, R. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover? American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
32. Virginia Board of Education. (2021). Guidelines for uniform performance standards and evaluation criteria for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.doe.virginia.gov/teaching/performance_evaluation/teacher/index.shtml
33. Wong, H. K. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 41–58.
34. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Young, V. M., Schmidt, R., Wang, H., Cassidy, L., & Laguarda, K. (2017). A comprehensive model of teacher induction: Implementation and impact on teachers and students. Report. Retrieved from https://newteachercenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/NTC-i3-Validation-Comprehensive-Report-with-App_Final.pdf