School Leader Education as a Driving Force for Professional Development in Terms of Orientation, Reflection, Exploration, and Interplay

Abstract

Following a professional program to ensure qualification for school leadership is a growing trend. However, school leaders have also come to understand and use content from educational programs in widely different ways. There is therefore a need to study how participating school principals experience learning differently within one and the same program. This empirical study uses qualitative methods to examine fourteen compulsory school principals’ experiences of how the mandatory Swedish National Principal Training Program contributes to their professional development. The findings show how program elements can be experienced as contributing to professional development of some principals while being experienced as obstacles for others, depending on becoming active or passive driving forces for participants in terms of orientation, reflection, exploration, and interplay. Applying a theoretical framework made it possible to describe and understand their professional development through program participation in a nuanced way. In terms of analytical generalization such knowledge may form the basis for development of school leader programs.

Keywords

• school leadership
• school leadership education
• professional development

References

1. Aas, M., & Törnsén, M. (2016). Examining Norwegian and Swedish leadership training programs in the light of international research. Nordic Studies in Education,36(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-07
2. Ärlestig, H. (2012). The Challenge of Educating Principals: Linking Course Content to Action. Planning & Changing, 43(3-4), 309. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/challenge-educating-principals-linking-course/docview/1506938479/se-2?accountid=11162
3. Biza, I., Jaworski, B., & Hemmi, K. (2014). Communities in university mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918351
4. Brauckmann, S., Pashiardis, P., & Ärlestig, H. (2020). Bringing context and educational leadership together: Fostering the professional development of school principals. Professional Development in Education, (Online print), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1747105
5. Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development in education. London: Sage.
6. Bush, T. (2018). Preparation and induction for school principals. Management in Education, 32(2), 66-71.
7. Crawford, M., & Cowie, M. (2012). Bridging Theory and Practice in Headship Preparation: Interpreting Experience and Challenging Assumptions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143211427978
8. Darling-Hammond, L., Meyerson, D., La Pointe, M., & Orr, M. T. (2010). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

9. Engeström, Y. (2013). From communities of practice to mycorrhizae. In J. Hughes, N. Jewson, & L. Unwin (Eds.), Communities of Practice: Critical Perspectives (pp. 41-54). London: Taylor and Francis.
10. Farnsworth, V., Kleanthous, I., & Wenger-Trayner, E. (2016). Communities of Practice as a Social Theory of Learning: A Conversation with Etienne Wenger. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(2), 139-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1133799
11. Forssten Seiser, A., & Söderström, Å. (2021). Rektorer i utbildning – drivkrafter för ett lärande i samspel. Högre Utbildning, 11(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v11.2947
12. Handley, K., Sturdy, A., Fincham, R. & Clark, T. (2006). Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice. Journal of Management Studies 43(3), 641-653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00605.x Huber, S. (2013). Multiple learning approaches in the professional development of school leaders – Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings on self-assessment and feedback. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41(4): 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143213485469
13. Huber, S. G., & Hiltmann, M. (2011). Competence Profile School Management (CPSM) – an inventory for the self-assessment of school leadership. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-010-9111-1
14. Jensen, R. (2016). School leadership development: what we know and how we know it. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(4), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.3898
15. Jensen, R. (2022). Professional development of school leadership as boundary work: patterns of initiatives and interactions based on a Norwegian case. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(4), 515-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1716998
16. Jensen, R., & Ottesen, E. (2022). Unfolding teaching practices in higher education courses: Cases from school leadership programs. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 2022, 101919. Availible at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101919
17. Jerdborg, S. (2021). Participation in the Swedish national principal training programme: How does it intertwine with principals’ practice? Educational Management, Administration & Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F174114322199871
18. Jerdborg, S. (2022a). Educating school leaders: engaging in diverse orientations to leadership practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(2), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1770867
19. Jerdborg, S. (2022b). Learning Principalship: Becoming a Principal in a Swedish Context. A study of Principals in Education and Practice. (Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences; 467) [Doctoral thesis, University of Gothenburg]. Available at: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/70566
20. Kanes, C., & Lerman, S. (2008). Analysing Concepts of Community of Practice. In A. Watson & P. Winbourne (Eds.), New Directions for Situated Cognition in Mathematics Education (Vol. 45, pp. 303-328). Boston, MA: Springer US.
21. Liljenberg, M. & Wrethander, M., (2020). Leadership for school improvement - linking learning to leading over time. Professional development in education, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), pp.1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752288
22. Mcculla, N., & Degenhardt, L. (2016). Journeys to school leadership: How action learning identified what participants valued in a year-long Australian leadership development program centered on principles of good practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143214558574
23. Møller, J. (2016). Kvalifisering som skoleleder i en norsk kontekst: Et historisk tilbakeblikk og perspektiver på utdanning av skoleledere. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(4), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.3871
24. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Company.
25. Norberg, K. (2019). The Swedish national principal training programme: a programme in constant change. Journal of educational administration & history, 51(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2018.1513912
26. Oppland-Cordell, S., & Martin, D. (2015). Identity, power, and shifting participation in a mathematics workshop: Latin@ students’ negotiation of self and success. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0127-6
27. Orr, M. T. (2009). Program evaluation in leadership preparation and related fields. In M. D. Young & G. Crow G (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Education of School Leaders. (p. 457–498). New York: Routledge.
28. Orr, M., & Barber, M. (2006). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of partnership and conventional programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership, 16(6), 709-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460601600603
29. Orr, M., & Orphanos, S. (2011). How Graduate-Level Preparation Influences the Effectiveness of School Leaders: A Comparison of the Outcomes of Exemplary and Conventional Leadership Preparation Programs for Principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(1), 18-70. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F105268460601600603
30. Packer, M.J. & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and Constructivist Theories of Learning: Ontology, Not Just Epistemology. Educational psychologist, 35(4), pp.227–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
31. Skolverket (2020). Rektorsprogrammet. Måldokument 2021–2027. Stockholm: Skolverket.
32. Skolverket. (2015). Rektorsprogrammets måldokument. Stockholm: Skolverket.
33. Skott, P., & Törnsén, M. (2018). Rektorer, utbildning och lärande: Om tolv rektorers lärande och professionella utveckling. (Rapport (Institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk utvärdering), 2018:11). Retrieved from https://www.ifau.se/globalassets/pdf/se/2018/r-2018-11-rektorer-utbildning-och-larande.pdf
34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Young, M. D., Crow, G. M., Murphy, J., & Ogawa, R. (2009). Handbook of Research on the Education of School Leaders. Abingdon: Routledge.