Local Quality Management for Developing Schools’ Capacity Building: A Multiyear Study from Sweden

Abstract

In recent decades, there has been a growing body of research that highlights local education authorities (LEA) as potential contributors to support school capacity building and result development. Despite this, there are few empirical studies that have explored what effects different strategies and policy actions from the LEAs actual have over time. Based on results from a five-year research project in a major Swedish municipality, the aim with this multiyear and multi-level study is to explore the effects of a LEA’s quality management processes of six schools’ capacity building. The results from the study show a clear strengthening of the schools’ improvement agenda, improvement organization and improvement leadership of the six schools. Two LEA strategies can be distinguished as especially important to explain the school improvements: i) systematic and long-term data-based school improvement routines and processes; ii) quality dialogues for monitoring and support. Two conclusions can be drawn: i) the importance for the LEA to be responsive so its improvement strategies are integrated into the schools’ local school improvement system; ii) the importance that the LEA work with multifaceted strategies containing aspects of control and accountability and learning and support.

Keywords

• Local Quality Management
• Capacity Building
• Local Educational Authority
• School Improvement

References

1. Adolfsson, C-H. (2024a). The local governance of Swedish schools in light of a new educational policy landscape: Empirical exploration and theoretical elaboration, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 10:2, 85-97, DOI: 10.1080/20020317.2024.2348298
2. Adolfsson, C-H. (2024b). Large-scale school improvement: results of and conditions for systemic changes within coupled school systems. Journal of Educational Change, 1-25.
3. Adolfsson, C-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128-142.
4. Andersen, L. B., Bjørnholt, B., Bro, L., & Holm-Petersen, C. (2018). Achieving high quality through transformational leadership: A qualitative multilevel analysis of transformational leadership and perceived professional quality. Public Personnel Management, 47(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017747270
5. Andersson, K., & Liljenberg, M. (2020). “Tell us what, but not how”: Understanding intra-organisational trust among principals and LEA officials in a decentralised school system. School Leadership & Management, 40(5), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2020.1832980
6. Bryman, A. (2002). Samhällsvetenskapliga metoder [Social science methods]. Liber. Campbell, C., & Murillo, J. (2005). Big change question: Do local central authorities (LCAs) make a difference in school reform? Journal of Educational Change, 6, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-004-7785-1
7. Day, C., Qing, G., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
8. Dolph, D. (2017). Challenges and opportunities for school improvement: Recommendations for urban school principals. Education and Urban Society, 49(4), 363–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516659110

9. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability: System thinkers in action. Corwin Press. Hargreaves, A. (2010). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071489
10. Harris, A. (2001). Building the capacity for school improvement. School Leadership & Management, 21(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/10/1080/13632430120074419
11. Harris, A. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111174785
12. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Hashim, N. (2021). System leaders and system leadership: Exploring the contemporary evidence base. School Leadership & Management, 41(4–5), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1889492
13. Henriksen, Ø. (2018). Making sense across levels in local school governance: Dialogue meetings between a superintendent and subordinated school leaders. Nordic Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(2–3), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2752
14. Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452
15. Hopkins, M., & Woulfin, S. L. (2015). School system (re)design: Developing educational infrastructures to support school leadership and teaching practice. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9260-6
16. Håkansson, J., & Adolfsson, C-H. (2022). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of educational change, 23(3), 291-314.
17. Kuipers, J. M., Houtveen, A. A. M., & Wubbels, T. (2010). An integrated professional development model for effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1687–1694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.021
18. Lee, M., Seashore Louis, K., & Anderson, S. (2012). Local education authorities and student learning: The effects of policy and practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 23(2), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2011.652125
19. Leithwood, K., & Azah, V. (2016). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3) 245–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731500
20. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
21. Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & McCullough, C. (2019). How school districts influence student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0175
22. Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2021). Relations between an improving Swedish LEA and school principals with joint quality and improvement responsibilities. Education Inquiry, 12(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1802851
23. Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2023). Recognizing LEA officials translator competences when implementing new policy directives for documentation of schools systematic quality work. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 23(3), 697–710. doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2206882
24. Moore Johnson, S., Marietta, G., Higgins, M. C., Mapp, K. L., & Grossman, A. (2017). Achieving coherence in district improvement: Managing the relationship between the central office and schools. Harvard University Press.
25. Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art: Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
26. Nordholm, D. (2016). State policy directives and middle-tier translation in a Swedish example. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2015-0036
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Talis 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD Publishing.
28. Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2008). Teachers, schools and using evidence: Considerations of preparedness. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701876151
29. Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a Nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, 36(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2016-02-02
30. Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 25(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
31. Rinehart, K. E. (2021). Abductive analysis in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(2), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420935912
32. Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 307–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08318962
33. Rönnström, N., & Håkansson, J. (2021). Att leda utveckling av förbättringskapacitet och utbildningskvalitet [To lead the development of improvement capacity and educational quality]. In N. Rönnström & O. Johansson (Eds.), Natur & Kultur.
34. Seashore Louis, K. (2013). Districts, local education authorities, and context of policy analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1108/095782313113256 95
35. SFS. (2023). The Swedish Education Act (2023:800). Norstedts Juridik.
36. Stoll, L. (2009). Capacity building for school improvement or creating capacity for learning? A changing landscape. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9104-3
37. Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2017). Leadership effects on student learning mediated by teacher emotions. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success: The four paths framework (pp. 137–152). Springer International.
38. Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
39. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook: Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage. Timperley, H. S. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Open University Press.